Kudos to Bob Jungles and his article "The United States vs. The United States vs. The United States"! I have always called this phenomenom "The THREE United States". What follows is even MORE proof that U.S. Code Title 26 (Internal Revenue) was not supposed to apply to the 50 states as THE CODE TWICE HAD TO BE AMENDED WHEN TWO TERRITORIES - ALASKA AND HAWAII - BECAME REAL STATES...OF THE UNION!!!!

MORE PROOF THAT THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE WAS WRITTEN FOR WASHINGTON, D.C., FEDERAL TERRITORIES and POSSESSIONS and "PERSONS" DOING BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

When is a"State" not a "state"?

When it is "defin\" in United States Code Title 26, The Internal Revenue Code, that's when. In the "DEFINITIONS" section of Title 26, the word "State" is defined.

TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 79 >  7701(a)(10) reads:

 7701

(a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof”

(10) State

The term "State" shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.

Hmm. So they are defining "Stat\" to "include" D.C.? That hasn't defined anything. Why does't it say the following?

"The term "State" shall mean the fifty several states of the Union. The term shall include the District of Columbia, etc...".

THAT construction is CLEAR and UNAMBIGUOUS (as all legal definitions MUST be, in order to be lawful). Instead, they write the definition so as to force the READER to ASSUME that D.C. is being"included\" in the group of 50 several states. This is not true. The definition is intentionally misleading. The term "State" in the I.R.C. does not refer to the fifty several states in any way, shape or form. What follows is the proof...

THE ALASKAN AND HAWAIIN OMNIBUS ACTS

An Omnibus bill is a single document that is accepted in a single vote by a legislature but contains amendments to a number of other laws or even many entirely new laws. Sometimes a change of terms in one area of law requires amendments to many other laws. Omnibus bills are passed to cover all the changes.

When Alaska and Hawaii were admitted as the 49th and 50th States, they could no longer be classified as "Territories" of the United States** (federal gov't). Every law that referred to Alaska or Hawaii as "territories" had to be amended to reflect their new status as sovereign states of the Union!!

If you read the text of the Acts as they apply to the Internal Revenue Code, you will see quite clearly that Alaska and Hawaii are no longer to be considered as "States" under the I.R.C. Code because they have become sovereign "states (of the Union)". THIS CLEARLY AND UNAMBIGUOUSLY DEMONSTRATES THAT THE 50 STATES WERE NEVER SUPPOSED TO BE SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE!

===========================================

Exhibit\"A" : ALASKA OMNIBUS ACT

PUBLIC LAW 86-70; 73 STAT. 141

[H.R. 7120] 86th Congress -- First Session 1959

An Act to amend certain laws of the United States in light of the admission of the State of Alaska into the Union, and for other purposes.

INTERNAL REVENUE

Sec. 22

(h) Section 7701(a)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (relating to definition of State)

is amended by striking out "Territories" and inserting in lieu thereof "Territory of Hawaii".

(i) The amendments contained in subsections (a) through (h) of this section shall be effective as of January 3, 1959.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Exhibit\"" : HAWAII OMNIBUS ACT

PUBLIC LAW 86-624; 74 STAT. 411

[H.R. 11602] 86th Congress -- Second Session 1960

An Act to amend certain laws of the United States in light of the admission of the State of Hawaii into the Union, and for other purposes.

INTERNAL REVENUE

Sec. 18.

(j) Section 7701(a)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (relating to definition of "Stat") is amended by striking out "the Territory of Hawaii and".

(k) The amendments contained in subsections (a) through (j) of this section shall be effective as of August 21, 1959.

===========================================

BG: After all that\"striking out" and "amending", sec. 7701(a)(10) which used to read, in part,  "...includes the Territories of Alaska and Hawaii and the District of Columbia"

was changed to read,

"...includes the Territory of Hawaii and the District of Columbia\"

and changed further to NOW read,

"...includes the District of Columbia\".

Lawyers, Judges and Tax Collectors want to call me and others like me \"crazy\". Well, we\'re NOT crazy. We are fully SANE and, more importantly, FULLY AWAKE.

The Prosecution rests. Just wanted to share that with everyone.

All Love,

~~ G

Full Text of the Alaskan and Hawaiin Omnibus Acts can be found here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/append-b.htm