ON THE ‘OCCULT’ NATURE OF THE ORIGINAL MASONIC HIERARCHY
In the true and original sense of the word, a Mason is an apprentice served
trades-person who works with stone. Other Craft Guilds (wheelwrights,
shipwrights, engineers, farmers etc…) are for the related crafts, all of
which likewise necessitate the serving of an apprenticeship.
Imagine thirty people working on a building site.... they have to know what
they are doing, or there will be a serious accident, (a building site is a
very dangerous place with heavy pieces of metal, wood, and stone being
handled, often at considerable heights).
The ONLY WAY to get to know what you are doing on a building site is to
serve a craft apprenticeship.
book, and you cannot be told, the ONLY way is through direct hands-on
experience in an apprenticeship.
Back in the fifteenth century, and with roots going back at least as far as
the Egyptian civilisation, the Masonic Hierarchy was composed of Masons,
Master Masons, and Free Masons, all of whom would have served a Craft
Apprenticeship.
Even the very top Free-Masons in those days would first have served a craft
apprenticeship. Only then would anyone be admitted firstly as a practising
Mason.
The practising Mason, if he had the required qualities, may, after
considerable time serving as a Mason, be advanced to the position of Master
Mason, and after considerable further time serving as a Master Mason, and
with the required qualities, be advanced to the position of Free Mason.
This was a Hierarchy based on Wisdom and Experience, and it is the simple
reason why, to anyone outside the Masonic Lodges, their knowledge and power
was hidden, or ‘OCCULT’.
The Craft Guilds were obviously very powerful, as they included Builders
(the Primary Craft), Wheelwrights, Shipwrights, Blacksmiths, Farmers etc. If
anything was to be built, grown, transported, manufactured, repaired etc, it
could and would only be done by the “Masons” in the manner approved by them,
according to the wind and the tide, and with a good deal of common sense….
FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING:
THE FRAUDULENT PRODUCTION OF MONEY.
In the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, certain bankers discovered that
they could print ten times more paper money (promissory notes...) than they
had gold. This is known as Fractional Reserve Banking, but as we shall see,
it is a monstrous FRAUD!.
The Bankers lent this 'money' at interest (say ten percent per annum),
meaning that they could earn 10% interest each year on each promissory note.
10 pieces of paper, each earning 10% and we have 10x10%=100%.
By the end of one year, for each piece of gold they originally owned, they
now had the equivalent of two pieces of gold, (one real and one as assets
now owned by the bank).
The banks could now write ten pieces of paper for each of those 2 pieces of
gold = 20 promissory notes.
20 promissory notes loaned at 10% = 200%, another two pieces of gold
2 + 2 =4
By the end of the second year, for each piece of gold they originally owned,
they now had four pieces of gold.
The banks could now write ten pieces of paper for each of those 4 pieces of
gold = 40 promissory notes.
40 promissory notes loaned at 10% = 400%, another four pieces of gold
4 + 4 = 8
By the end of the third year, for each piece of gold they originally owned,
they now had eight pieces of gold.
The banks could now write ten pieces of paper for each of those 8 pieces of
gold = 80 promissory notes.
80 promissory notes loaned at 10% = 800%, another eight pieces of gold
8 + 8 = 16
By the end of the fourth year, for each piece of gold they originally owned,
they now had sixteen pieces of gold.....
THE BANKS FOUND THAT THEY COULD DOUBLE THEIR WEALTH EACH YEAR BY HAVING
EVERYONE ELSE PAYING INTEREST TO THEM ON THIS PAPER 'MONEY'.....
1
2
4
8
16
32
64
128
256
512
1024,
after 11 years banking, starting with one piece of gold, the banks now had
the equivalent wealth of 1024 pieces of gold, (call it 1000 for easy
maths...)….
after another 11 years, or after 22 years of banking they had 1000 times
1000 = 1 million pieces of gold.
after 33 years of banking they had 1000 times 1 million = one thousand
million pieces of gold.
after 44 years of banking they had 1000 times one thousand million pieces of
gold = one million times a million pieces of gold.
after 44 years of banking, starting with one piece of gold, the banks now
had 1,000,000,000,
that is a proper English BILLION, which is 31709 years in seconds.... this
is how many pieces of gold the banks had 'earned' after only 44 years of
banking, and the next year it doubled!!!
the banks have been doing this for FIVE HUNDRED YEARS!!!!
THIS IS NOT ‘CAPITALISM’
-IT IS A MONSTROUS FRAUD!
HOW THE ORIGINAL BRITISH MASONIC HIERARCHY WAS CORRUPTED IN 1742.
As shown above, the Masons included all the craft guilds, wheel wrights,
ship wrights, cobblers, tailors, blacksmiths, so they were extremely
powerful....
The bankers with their new-found wealth now wanted to be admitted as Free
Masons without having served all the time necessary to gain the high
position of response-ability which is a Practising Free Mason.
There was a battle for 250 years between the banks and the Masonic
Hierarchy.
In 1742, the banks won, and in that year, in the city of York, the first
person was admitted into a Masonic Lodge as a freemason without having
served an apprenticeship.
Since then, there have been two types of free-mason
1). Practising Free Masons, who HAVE served an apprenticeship
and
2). Accepted Free-Masons who HAVE NOT served an apprenticeship.
Probably 90% of Freemasons today are Accepted Freemasons who have NOT SERVED
AN APPRENTICESHIP, they do not have the accrued wisdom and common sense from
many years of being supervised, of practising a Craft, and then of
supervising others on the way up the ladder.
Most Accepted Freemasons of today do not even know how to boil an egg, let
alone fix a slate on their roof should it need repairing...
These are the people who are now Free Masons in positions of high office
and response-ability for our Western Global Culture; in Industry, Religion,
Finance, Medicine, Law, and Politics. We might call this state of affairs a
response-DISability…
In view of the consequences of their actions of AGGRAVATED CRIMINAL DAMAGE
AND DESTRUCTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT, the position of many contemporary
Accepted Freemasons is both Morally, Legally, and Politically untenable!
HOW MORE THAN HALF OF YOUR WAGES
IS NOW BEING STOLEN BY THE BANKS:
ROUGHLY:
one third of a person's wages goes to pay the mortgage,
one third is tax,
and the remaining third you get to spend...
Approximate Proportion of Interest paid to the Banks out of the Price of any
Product Bought.
if you buy (for example) a china cup in a shop:-
a) someone has borrowed money from a bank to set up a quarry to extract the
china clay from the earth: they are paying interest to the bank on that loan
b) someone has borrowed money from a bank to buy a lorry to transport the
china clay to the factory which makes the cups:
they are paying interest to the bank on that loan
c) someone has borrowed money from a bank to set up the factory which makes
the cups:
they are paying interest to the bank on that loan
d) someone has borrowed money from a bank to buy a lorry to transport the
cups to the wholesaler:
they are paying interest to the bank on that loan
e) someone has borrowed money from a bank to set up the wholesale business:
they are paying interest to the bank on that loan
f) someone has borrowed money from a bank to buy a lorry to transport the
cups to the retailer:
they are paying interest to the bank on that loan
g) someone has borrowed money from a bank to set up the retail business:
they are paying interest to the bank on that loan
h) all of those people from a) to g) above...
are paying interest to the bank on their mortgages.
all these interest payments to the banks are coming out of the purchase
price of the china cup....
if we add all these interest payments together we find that at least 50% of
the price of ANY item we buy is interest being paid to the banks.
APPROXIMATE PROPORTION OF MONTHLY MORTGAGE OR RENT PAYMENTS
WHICH IS INTEREST PAID TO THE BANKS
if you borrow, say £100,000 @ 7.5%
over 40 years as a mortgage
to buy a house,
you will have to pay back roughly £300,000 with interest....
this means that
roughly two thirds
of the third of your wages
which is paying the mortgage
is paying interest on that loan.
APPROXIMATE PROPORTION OF TAX
WHICH IS INTEREST ON THE NATIONAL DEBT
PAID OUT OF OUR TAXES TO THE BANKS.
The Bank of England is a privately owned company.
The government has granted a license to the Bank of England to print money.
The government borrows money from the Bank of England, and the government
pays interest on that loan.
That interest is paid out of the third of your wages which is paying tax to
the government.
Also, almost everyone who works for the government has a mortgage (or is
paying rent which is probably paying someone else’s mortgage), and the
interest payments for their mortgage is paid out of their wages, which is
also paid out of tax. This amounts to something like another 10% of tax
being paid as interest to the banks.
Furthermore, everyone who works for the government is spending about one
third of their wages as they choose; but as shown above, roughly half of
that money is also paid to the banks as interest, which probably amounts to
at least another 10% of tax going to the banks.
If we add these together, we can see that well over half of everyone's tax
is paying interest to the banks…
MORE THAN HALF OF YOUR WAGES
IS BEING STOLEN BY THE BANKS.
ROUGHLY 50% OF THE PRICE OF ANYTHING YOU BUY IS PAYING INTEREST TO THE BANK.
ABOUT 66% OF YOUR MORTGAGE IS PAYING INTEREST TO THE BANK.
AROUND 50% OF YOUR TAX IS PAYING INTEREST TO THE BANK.
ADDING THESE TOGETHER:
WE FIND THAT WELL OVER HALF OF EVERYONE'S WAGES IS PAYING INTEREST TO THE
BANKS….
THEREFORE:
IF WE SIMPLY ABOLISH USURY,
WE CAN WORK LESS THAN HALF THE AMOUNT OF HOURS IN A WEEK, (AND CONSEQUENTLY
DO LESS THAN HALF THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGE TO THE ENVIRONMENT) WHILE MAINTAINING
THE SAME STANDARD OF LIVING, AND HAVE TWICE AS MUCH LEISURE TIME
GLOBAL PERMACULTURE: A Practical Solution!
LAW & THE ENVIRONMENT:
A UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE OF LAW.
There is a Law of social behaviour which has always applied, and which must
always apply to any group of creatures, at any time, in any possible
universe.
The Law is simply that any creatures living together in a group do not, as a
general rule, injure each other.
If the members of a group injure each other as a general rule, then that
group will get smaller and smaller until there is only one member left,
which is not a group.
It is quite natural in many groups for the members to establish a
pecking-order, and during this process some injury may be done; but once the
pecking-order has been established and each group member knows hir place
very little further conflict is seen.
This Law applies to any group of creatures, living at any time, in any
conceivable universe. Therefore; if we are to believe in a Divine Architect
who or which created the Universe, then this must be a Divine principle of
Law.
If there is no Divinity, then this Law exists anyway, as a Natural Law.
Now imagine a Divinity which wishes to create a new Universe with a group of
creatures living in the New Universe. In this case the Divinity has to obey
the Law or there cannot be a group of creatures in the New Universe…
This Is A Law Which Any Divinity Has To Obey.
THEREFORE, ANY REASONABLE PERSON, OF ANY FAITH, INCLUDING AN ATHEIST,
(SPECIFICALLY ANY RELIGIOUS, POLITICAL, INDUSTRIAL, LEGAL OR FINANCIAL
LEADER…) ON THE EARTH HAS TO AGREE WITH THIS PRINCIPLE OR LOOK LIKE A FOOL.
THE DUTY OF CARE - A DIVINE PRINCIPLE.
The "Duty of Care" states that:
"YOU MUST TAKE REASONABLE CARE TO AVOID ACTS OR OMISSIONS WHICH YOU CAN
REASONABLY FORESEE WOULD BE LIKELY TO INJURE YOUR NEIGHBOUR ."
In Law, the Duty of Care is applied to all persons, including the
Government.
The failure to uphold the 'Duty of Care' is either:
NEGLIGENCE, which is doing something likely to injure your neighbour in
circumstances when you would not reasonably be expected to know that the
thing you are doing is likely to injure your neighbour.
NEGLIGENCE is a CIVIL offence, where an offender may be liable to pay
damages in a civil court;
RECKLESSNESS, is doing something KNOWINGLY which is likely to injure your
neighbour.
RECKLESSNESS is a CRIMINAL matter, and an offender may be fined and/or
imprisoned and/or be liable for damages;
or INTENTIONAL INJURY, which is to INTEND by your act or omission to injure
your neighbour.
INTENTIONAL INJURY is the most serious type of criminal offence which is
generally punished with the full weight of the Criminal Law.
Not only is the Duty of Care a Universal Principle of Law, it is also used
to create precedent or new Law.
If a defendant can show that his behaviour is "reasonable, prudent and
well-intentioned" in the circumstances he finds himself in, then he is not
guilty of a crime.
There are times when it may be seen as "reasonable, prudent and
well-intentioned" to disregard Statute Law "in order to serve a greater
interest" (see examples below).
The ‘Duty Of Care’ Is The Most Important Principle Of Law.
The ‘Duty Of Care’ Can Over-Ride Any Statute.
The ‘Duty Of Care’ Is Used To Create New Precedents.
THE DUTY OF CARE IS THE LAW!
THE DUTY OF CARE – EXAMPLES:
The Duty of Care is used in court every day to determine the guilt or
innocence of every defendant who appears in the dock. Two examples will
serve to clarify the point.
EXAMPLE ONE:
(a). A person is driving a car who has no mechanical knowledge, this person
has had the car serviced and maintained by qualified personnel and has the
service history in the glove box of the car. The tax, mot and insurance are
all up to date. This person has done all that can be reasonably expected to
ensure that the car is safe, yet when stopped by the police in a routine
road check, it is found that they have defective brakes. This is doing
something which is likely to injure their neighbour yet having taken all
reasonable steps to insure that what they were doing was not likely to cause
injury. The person is still responsible in a civil court for the payment of
damages should they injure someone as a result, but they have not behaved
criminally.
(b). The same person is driving the same car along the same piece of road at
the same speed and is stopped by the same police officer who, this time,
forms the reasonably held belief that the person knew that the brakes were
defective. This time the person will very likely be tried in a criminal
court for doing something which is likely to injure their neighbour
knowingly, if it is found that the person did know that the brakes were
defective, this is reckless behaviour as such is criminal.
(c). The same person is again driving the same car along the same piece of
road at the same speed and is stopped again by the same police officer who,
this time, forms the reasonably held belief that the person driving was
aiming to hit someone. This time the person will very likely be tried in a
criminal court for doing something which is likely to injure their neighbour
intentionally, if it is found that the person did intend to hit someone with
the car then this is obviously a seriously criminal matter.
It may be seen from the above that not only does there have to be an
unlawful act committed ….
FOR A DEFENDANT TO BE FOUND GUILTY OF A CRIME, HIS MENTAL STATE HAS TO BE OF
A CRIMINAL NATURE.
EXAMPLE TWO:
The case of the “Hungerford Massacre” where a man called Michael Ryan shot
around 30 people in the street at Hungerford, and then shot himself:
If, after Michael Ryan had shot say one or two people, and a reasonable
prudent & well-intentioned person ‘X’ who was nearby had shot him (to
prevent Ryan from shooting anyone else), then ‘X’ would not be found guilty
of a crime, even if he had used reasonable force to ‘steal’ his gun from
someone else or from a shop.
In ordinary circumstances a person who in a public place stole a gun and
then shot someone with it, would be found guilty of assault, battery, theft
of a firearm, unlawful possession and use of a firearm, endangering public
life, and murder.
Such a person would receive a heavy gaol sentence (around 30 years).
THEREFORE; IF A DEFENDANT CAN SHOW THAT HE UPHELD THE DUTY OF CARE BY
BEHAVING REASONABLY, PRUDENTLY & WITH GOOD INTENT, THEN HE IS NOT GUILTY OF
A CRIME, REGARDLESS OF ANY STATUTE OR PREVIOUS CASE LAW.
THE DUTY OF CARE CAN OVERTURN ANY ACT OF PARLIAMENT.
THE DUTY OF CARE IS THE LAW!
The Duty Of Care Applied To UUED&D:
UN-NECESSARY & UNREASONABLE
ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE & DESTRUCTION,
There have been many cases which are relevant on the eco front; the most
dramatic was that of the Ploughshares women who broke into British Aerospace
and damaged combat aircraft which were to be exported to the Indonesian
Government in order to subjugate the natives who were (and still are!)
trying to resist the encroachment of western hotel complexes (etc etc) on
the Natural Forest which is their home. Normally, to break into British
Aerospace and damage combat aircraft would be a very serious offence
involving interference with the defence of the Realm. However, when it was
found that prior to this action the women had taken all REASONABLE steps to
make their point known (they wrote petitions and staged peaceful
demonstrations etc), and it was realised that the matter was genuinely felt
by the women to be of sufficient urgency to justify such an action, the
women (after serving several months remanded in custody) were found NOT
GUILTY of any crime.
Another case in point is that many thousands of eco-activists have been
arrested under the Criminal Justice And Public Order Acts, for damaging and
destroying (Criminal Damage to..) Genetically Modified crops, yet only a
very few have been found guilty of any crime, and the end result of this
international campaigning has been the severe restriction of multinational
corporations (Monsanto, Dupont etc) in their attempts to sell these highly
dangerous products on the open market!
This is because it is unarguably the case that in the face of the threat due
to UUED&D being of a similar magnitude to the threat that a war would pose,
it is REASONABLE, PRUDENT AND WELL-INTENTIONED to take
NonViolentDirectAct
Bearing in mind the huge increase in public awareness of UUED&D . over the
last five or ten years, it is no longer possible for anyone in a position of
responsibility to claim that they are unaware of the threat of UUED&D . to
the well-being and security of society.
Any acts or omissions leading to further UUED&D are done in the full
knowledge that such acts and omissions are injuring all of us, on a massive
scale, physically, emotionally, mentally and spiritually; THEREFORE:
ACTS OR OMISSIONS LEADING TO UN-NECESSARY & UNREASONABLE
ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE & DESTRUCTION ARE RECKLESS AND CRIMINAL.
THE DUTY OF CARE APPLIED TO GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT.
Successive Governments all around the World have knowingly both acted (i.e.
passed CRIMINAL acts of parliament) to allow UUED&D, and have omitted to
control it.
Therefore the World’s Governments are manifestly reckless and CRIMINAL by
act and omission in their Duty of Care for the Global Environment.
In Law, it is illegal to pay a servant to commit a crime (the responsibility
of a master for the act of a servant ); so if the Government of a country is
criminal, then it is illegal for the People of that country to pay tax to
their Government until their Government stops being criminal.
It is our intention to inform the people of these facts, thereby exerting
maximum political pressure upon the World’s Governments to cease their
criminal behaviour.
The only way the World’s Governments can cease this environmental
recklessness is to provide all reasonably available resources for
sustainable environmental development, anything less being an omission which
will certainly cause further physical, emotional, mental and spiritual
injury to the People.
The question which then arises is “How many resources are reasonably
available for this purpose?”
Most people will now agree that the threat of UUED&D is as serious as, or
worse than a threat of world war.
Therefore we may assert that the global resources reasonably available to
remedy this most serious threat, are of similar magnitude to those which
would be made available to fight a world war.
In other words:
IT IS ILLEGAL TO PAY TAX UNTIL A ‘GLOBAL STATE OF EMERGENCY’ IS DECLARED FOR
THE ENVIRONMENT; MOBILISING ALL OUR AMAZING TECHNOLOGY IN THE CREATION OF A
BEAUTIFUL PERMACULTURE GARDEN ON THE EARTH, FOR THE BENEFIT OF HUMANITY, AS
IT WAS INTENDED BY ITS INVENTORS
*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR ***
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser.
Please check http://tinyurl.
<http://groups.
http://groups.
news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all
posts)
free book download: http://www.lulu.
<blocked::http://www.lulu.
http://www.lulu.
<blocked::http://www.lulu.
pdf>
http://blogs.
http://blogs.
http://bb.domaindlx
<http://bb.domaindlx
*** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes
only. *** Welcome to Real News Edited excerpts, non-partisan,
pro-truth-honesty-
corruptions, frauds, deceptions, lies, criminal plans, cover-ups and
free-speech silencing by powerful people in governments, foundations,
corporations and media, which are done using the name of democracy, human
rights, false interpretations of religions, cults, occults, patriotism,
economy, business, media, elections, justice, charity, etc., and are used to
trick the public into hatred & wars and out of their lives, money and
freedoms, while the propaganda we are subjected to makes us believe that we
have evolved to where such things cannot happen [remember slavery,
apartheid…]. Please share what you learn with others who do not have access
to the internet. This is only a tip of the iceberg. Stop the hatred that is
used to promote the dehumanization of the victims of predatory
aggressions;
territory of the neo-feudal lords by rejecting the mainstream news
propaganda. Caution: real news may induce a kind of schizophrenia because it
provides a true vision of reality which is so different from the one we are
presented by the mass media spins. Latest real infonews available at
alternate news. ***** Check whatreallyhappened.
savethemales.
Truth We Trust! The opinions expressed herein contain positions and
viewpoints that are not necessarily those of the recipient, disseminator or
others mentioned in the information. These are offered as a means to
stimulate dialogue and discussion.
NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency
(NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do
this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse,
nor protection..
is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the
Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer
Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire &
are all intended for entertainment and amusement only.