Supposedly all those F-22's, worth 7.5 BILLION dollars, were destroyed by Michael when it hit Tyndall air force base!!!

But no one can find anything other than one that was a known prop and a known stripped out trainer in any of the wreckage.

Here's the skinny on this: Earth.nullschool.net does not screw up. They provided modeling that proved, from what only nature provided, Michael should have been a cat 1. Here's how they do it:

If 3 international agencies, plus Noaa, fed such faulty environmental conditions into this system that it miscalculated Michael by 4 categories, it would be useless and an embarassment.

It is not useless, and is not an embarassment, it got all the other hurricanes right, why did it screw up Michael?

ANSWER:

Because the super computers were only fed natural data, and did not have, as part of their calculation scheme, whatever the weather modification system was doing to Michael. THIS SYSTEM PROVED HOSTILE WEATHER MODIFICATION BY SHOWING WHAT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED, VS WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED. THEY ARE BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED!!!

I GOT PUNKED!!!

There were several bloggers shouting from the roof tops about how Michael was a weather mod storm, and I ignored them because I was watching the wind map, which was using only natural data, and saying NOPE, everything looks fine from here!

I THINK I FIGURED OUT WHY THE GLOBAL WIND MAP WAS WRONG

People who have stated Michael was geoengineered ought to consider this as supporting evidence:

The global windmap at earth.nullschool.net uses all natural environmental factors and calculates via supercomputers what the wind should be in a given area. It is normally very accurate. However If someone used EM weaponry to beef up Michael, the supercomputers would lack that data to calculate how strong Michael actually was. AND WHY WOULD THEY BEEF UP MICHAEL? SO ISRAEL COULD GET A WHOLE BUNCH OF F-22 STEALTH FIGHTERS, SEE THE FOLLOWING:

DAMAGE TO TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE INDICATES MICHAEL WAS AS ADVERTISED

Finally convincing evidence that Michael was as strong as stated came out of Tyndall air force base. Even if it was not quite as strong as they said, it's not worth splitting hairs, I was wrong, and now agree with the geoengineering people who are claiming Michael was not natural. It had the potential to be natural and nasty but it is likely they beefed it up beyond that.

The global wind map cannot be used for hurricane intensity if the hurricanes are artificially enhanced. It says RIGHT HERE that the wind map is rendered by super computers based on natural input data. Michael should have been a cat 1 if only nature created it.

The conflict between reality and this wind map, which says what should have been is the smoking gun to prove Michael was artificially enhanced.

Ok, so here's the story. Supposedly 22 F-22's were left behind at the base and were destroyed by the hurricane. That's a 7.5 billion loss. Problem: I only saw two F-22 type planes in the photos, one was a prop at the front of the base, and one was in a hangar and "experts" were saying it was a different plane. Many people are now suspecting that these stealth fighters, that cost $350 million each, were given to Israel with Michael as a front for where they went. THAT would be a PRIME reason to beef up a hurricane and front their loss. Israel needed to offset the S-300's and the F-22 was the only plane that could do it.

The Washington Times is claiming the planes were lost. But I seriously doubt the air force would be stupid enough to leave them behind, NO MATTER WHAT. Supposedly they were not flight worthy. But there's a difference between "flight worthy" and flight worthy, only a fool would believe they let them just sit there. You can damn well bet they could take off, even if not approved for flight. And I'd bet they did. Now, the question is, where are they?

HURRICANE MICHAEL DAMAGE A LOT WORSE THAN I EXPECTED

Still, all the main damage is on the shoreline, caused by storm surge but it is really stunning damage. I do not think a cat 1 would do that type of damage. I will keep watching for new stuff to come in and at this point think I might have been wrong about the intensity. If so, the wind map does not work for this. I have not decided yet, if there is still no widespread damage showing away from the shore in any photos a week from now I'll still say cat 1 or 2, but I have not missed the fact that the shoreline area is absolutely annihilated.

Either the hurricane was really bad or there was piss poor planning against storm surge. Oftentimes homes are only built a couple feet above sea level around the beach and get wiped out by even mundane hurricanes due to the storm surge. If there are not even destroyed trailer park pics from inland, I am going to conclude that was the case here, but for now I am at least going to mention that I have not missed noticing how incredible the shoreline damage is..

There are some oddities however - the tree damage is not what I would expect with such massive property damage, which would indicate storm surge caused most of the damage. Homes hold up better in the wind than trees do, and in with the destroyed beach homes there are perfectly intact trees. Storm surge is the opposite - trees hold up OK but homes get floated off their foundations and smashed to smithereens. So I have not decided what is what yet.

When people build on the beach in a hurricane zone they know they are taking a huge risk, so I normally don't have any sympathy, but the photos are so stunning it is hard to not feel sorry for those people.

The defining answer will be: Are the trailer parks OK? If so, it was not a cat 4. Still searching and waiting for photos. . .

Jim Stone

Sent by rod@disroot.org