To the tragedy currently unfolding upon the World’s smallest Continent of Australia we can read as reported by Britain’s Independent News Service in their article titled "Australia's epic drought: The situation is grim", and which says:

"Australia has warned that it will have to switch off the water supply to the continent's food bowl unless heavy rains break an epic drought - heralding what could be the first climate change-driven disaster to strike a developed nation.

The Murray-Darling basin in south-eastern Australia yields 40 per cent of the country's agricultural produce. But the two rivers that feed the region are so pitifully low that there will soon be only enough water for drinking supplies. Australia is in the grip of its worst drought on record, the victim of changing weather patterns attributed to global warming and a government that is only just starting to wake up to the severity of the position.

The Prime Minister, John Howard, a hardened climate- change sceptic, delivered dire tidings to the nation's farmers yesterday. Unless there is significant rainfall in the next six to eight weeks, irrigation will be banned in the principal agricultural area. Crops such as rice, cotton and wine grapes will fail, citrus, olive and almond trees will die, along with livestock.

A ban on irrigation, which would remain in place until May next year, spells possible ruin for thousands of farmers, already debt-laden and in despair after six straight years of drought."

FSB sources commenting on these reports state that the Australian government request to other Western Nations are for the establishment of an International ‘working group’ tasked with devising a scheme for the ‘immediate’ evacuation of upwards of 11 million human beings.

These reports further state that such a scheme is indeed workable due to the accelerated growth of the Western cruise ship industry over the past two decades; and which has seen World-Wide capacity reach to over 500,000 passengers…with just two of these industries giants, Carnival and Norwegian Cruise Lines, having nearly 60,000 capacities alone.

With this giant capacity, and again according to these reports, it is ‘entirely feasible’ for Australia, or any Nation, to evacuate up to 10 million of its citizens in just 6 months time, with the main question being, of course, where to bring them?

The most likely destination would be the vast wilderness areas of North America, including Alaska and Canada, and which according to the latest scientific reports of Global Warming will be one of the only areas on Earth to benefit from the vast climate changes taking place in our World.

What remains an ‘unknown’, at this time, would be the reaction of other of the World’s Nations to the mass resettlement of climate change refuges by the West, but which some of America’s top military officers have warned the United States to be prepared for, and as we can read as reported by the Bloomberg News Service in their article titled "Global Warming Equals True Equivalent of War", and which says:

"You know climate change has become a top priority in Washington when it starts penetrating the thinking of leaders in the U.S. military and intelligence community. Eleven retired generals and admirals have sent out a warning shot about national-security threats from climate change, calling it a ``threat-multiplier'' that will make unstable regions shakier through increased drought, extreme weather, migrations and rising extremism."

The United Nations has, likewise, warned about these dangers, and as we can read as reported by the Houston Chronicle News Service in their article titled "Weather wars", and which says:

"In a groundbreaking debate at the United Nations Security Council last week, diplomats raised the chilling specter of large areas of the world torn by armed conflicts among populations beset by flood, drought and other side effects of climate change. Pressing the case that global warming represents a threat to international security, British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett told the council "an unstable climate will exacerbate some of the core drivers of conflict, such as migratory pressures and competition for resources."

Most surprising of these World shaking events remains the perplexing attitude of the Americans, and who, seemingly, continue to ignore the grave implications of this dire threat.

The same cannot be said of their Top Military Leaders who have, literally, gone to war with the entire World based upon the horrific 2004 Pentagon assessment of climate change, and its consequences, and as we can read as reported by Britain’s Guardian Unlimited News Service in their article titled "Now the Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us", and which says:

“Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters.

A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a 'Siberian' climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world.

The document predicts that abrupt climate change could bring the planet to the edge of anarchy as countries develop a nuclear threat to defend and secure dwindling food, water and energy supplies. The threat to global stability vastly eclipses that of terrorism, say the few experts privy to its contents.

'Disruption and conflict will be endemic features of life,' concludes the Pentagon analysis. 'Once again, warfare would define human life.”

It would, perhaps, be instructive to these American people to follow the examples of their fellow human beings, from all around the World, who in knowing these things, and as the spring sun continues to shine, have ceased all of their ordinary activities to begin the planting of crops and vegetables for their own, and their families, security through the coming year.

[Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence, any and all opinions about the United States except those coming from authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one. No interviews are granted and very little personal information is given about our contributors, or their sources, to protect their safety.]