April 29, 2014

Multi Media – click and scroll for videos: http://www.policymic.com/articles/88357/science-shows-how-guitar-players-brains-are-actually-different-from-everybody-elses?utm_source=policymicFB&utm_medium=main&utm_campaign=social

 

 

Whether it's playing "Stairway to Heaven" until your fingers bleed or always finding yourself in the center of a group of people intent on singing "Wagon Wheel," some things are common to all guitarists <http://www.policymic.com/articles/87171/what-the-instrument-you-play-says-about-you> .

 

 

Including, as it turns out, their brain chemistry

 

 

For starters, guitarists literally have the ability to synchronize their brains while playing. In a 2012 study <http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00312/full>  in Berlin, researchers had 12 pairs of guitarists play the same piece of music while having their brains scanned. They discovered that the guitarists' neural networks would synchronize not only during the piece, but even slightly before playing. So, basically, guitarists can read each others' minds better than they can read music.

 

 

That synch happens in the areas of the brain that deal with music production and social cognition, so it makes a real difference in how tight a band sounds. When people talk about a band's chemistry, this may well be what they're seeing. It also explains why brothers are the core <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8OipmKFDeM>  duo <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5iTQf5PDyY>  in so many <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpz_gUyImhw>  famous <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BciOfJsqh7M>  rock <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF0HhrwIwp0>  bands.

 

 

But part of this ability to synchronize actually comes from one overarching truth about guitarists: they're more intuitive than most.

 

 

It sounds weird to solo while hooked up to a scanning machine, but a few brave guitarists pulled it off and contributed a major finding to the science of guitars. Researchers found <http://www.dana.org/News/Details.aspx?id=43160>  that, when a guitarist shreds, he or she temporarily deactivates the brain region that routinely shuts down when achieving big-picture goals, signalling a shift from conscious to unconscious thought.

 

 

And when mere mortals (non-musicians) attempt a solo, the conscious portion of their brain stays on, which indicates that real guitarists are able to switch to this more creative and less practical mode of thinking more easily. 

 

 

Exhibit A: 

 

 

All of the research makes it clear that guitarists are just super spiritual, intuitive people. Think about anyone from the Jimmy Page to the Edge right on up to Bon Iver. That sort of intuitive thinking runs all the way to how they learn. Unlike musicians who learn through sheet music, guitarists, according to researchers <http://news.vanderbilt.edu/2012/11/learning-guitar-different-other-instruments/>  at Vanderbilt University, get a better grasp of a song by looking at someone playing it rather than reading the notes on paper.

 

 

 

The intuition might come from one truth every guitarist knows: playing guitar transcends basic brain chemistry. In a famous incident, Pat Martino, a renowned jazz guitarist from Philadelphia, had 70% of his left temporal lobe removed in his mid-30s due to a hemorrhage. When he came out of surgery, he couldn't play any longer.

 

 

But guitar-playing is about more than any one part of your brain. Within two years, Martino was able to completely relearn how to play the jazz guitar <http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2013/10/06/jazz-guitar-after-brain-damage/#.U1aER_ldXTo> . Scientists everywhere have used his brain as an amazing example of cerebral plasticity. For guitarists, he represents something else — playing guitar isn't a skill. It's a way of being.

   

 

 

Jordan Taylor Sloan is a Nashville Journalist        

Artists 'have structurally different brains'  

By Melissa Hogenboom, Science reporter, BBC Radio Science

17 April 2014

http://www.bbc.com/news/health-15353397

 

Brain scans revealed artists have more grey matter in parts of their brains

 

 

Artists have structurally different brains compared with non-artists, a study has found.

 

 

Participants' brain scans revealed that artists had increased neural matter in areas relating to fine motor movements and visual imagery.

 

 

The research, published in NeuroImage <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811914002237> , suggests that an artist's talent could be innate.

 

 

But training and environmental upbringing also play crucial roles in their ability, the authors report.

 

 

As in many areas of science, the exact interplay of nature and nurture remains unclear.

 

 

Lead author Rebecca Chamberlain from KU Leuven, Belgium, said she was interested in finding out how artists saw the world differently.

 

 

"The people who are better at drawing really seem to have more developed structures in regions of the brain that control for fine motor performance and what we call procedural memory," she explained.

 

 

In their small study, researchers peered into the brains of 21 art students and compared them to 23 non-artists using a scanning method called voxel-based morphometry.

 

 

One artist who has practised for many years is Alice Shirley.

 

 

These detailed scans revealed that the artist group had significantly more grey matter in an area of the brain called the precuneus in the parietal lobe.

 

 

"This region is involved in a range of functions but potentially in things that could be linked to creativity, like visual imagery - being able to manipulate visual images in your brain, combine them and deconstruct them," Dr Chamberlain told the BBC's Inside Science programme <http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04009cd> .

  

 

Alice Shirley – artist:

 

 

 

"I had a very arty family. My mother was an art historian and my dad a photographer.

 

 

"I grew up surrounded by art and was encouraged to draw from a very young age, and I liked it so I did more of it. It was a combination of encouragement and enthusiasm that made me interested in pursuing art.

 

 

"It's just in the blood."

 

 

Alice spoke to BBC Radio 4's Inside Science Programme

 

 

• For the full report, listen to Inside Science on BBC Radio 4  <http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04009cd>

     

 

Participants also completed drawing tasks and the team looked at the relationship between their performance in this task and their grey and white matter.

 

 

 

A changing brain      

 

 

Those better at drawing had increased grey and white matter in the cerebellum and also in the supplementary motor area - both areas that are involved with fine motor control and performance of routine actions.

 

 

Grey matter is largely composed of nerve cells, while white matter is responsible for communication between the grey matter regions.

 

 

But it is still not clear what this increase of neural matter might mean. From looking at related studies of other creative people, such as musicians <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2044646.stm> , it suggests that these individuals have enhanced processing in these areas, Dr Chamberlain added.

 

 

"It falls into line with evidence that focus of expertise really does change the brain. The brain is incredibly flexible in response to training and there are huge individual differences that we are only beginning to tap into."

 

 

Another author of the paper, Chris McManus from University College London, said it was difficult to distinguish what aspect of artistic talent was innate or learnt.  

 

 

"We would need to do further studies where we look at teenagers and see how they develop in their drawing as they grow older - but I think [this study] has given us a handle on how we could begin to look at this."

 

 

Commenting on the small sample size, Prof McManus said: "Since the results were statistically significant then clearly there was the power to find something, which almost by definition means it was large enough.

 

 

"And also of interest is that other people have also had hints at effects in similar locations. Obviously in an ideal world we'd like 1000 subjects, but that isn't realistic. It's always a compromise between cost, practicality and interest."

 

 

No 'right' side      

 

 

Ellen Winner of Boston College, US, who was not involved with the study, commented that it was very interesting research.

 

 

She said it should help "put to rest the facile claims that artists use 'the right side of their brain' given that increased grey and white matter were found in the art group in both left and right structures of the brain".

 

 

"Only a prospective study could get at the question of innate structural brain differences that predispose people to become visual artists, and this kind of study has not been done as it would be very difficult and very expensive to carry out."