- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search


A.W. Mann

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

June 4, 2016


For years, Americans were told that they must have fewer children so that the planet’s resources would not be depleted, etc.  In 1968, the Club of Rome concluded that civilization and the environment would collapse unless the death rate was increased (which has been done through wars) and the birth rate was lowered (through abortions, contraception, and sterility).  Paul Ehrlich promoted this in his book The Population Bomb.  Ehrlich’s wife was a member of the Club of Rome.  However, today our leaders are bemoaning the decline of our birth rate and want to solve this by bringing in “refugees” and illegals, none of whom are being condemned for not reducing their birth rates.  One would think that congratulations are in order to Americans for voluntarily cutting down their birth rate and should be rewarded by downsizing our government.  Instead, the traditional family unit in America is being further weakened through the promotion of homosexuality, gay marriage, transgenderism, drugs, and unemployment.  Those who protest are threatened with arrest and imprisonment for being hateful and intolerant.  Whites are the ones specifically targeted (see video “The Endgame – White Genocide” in the article “The Shocking Endgame Plan – The ‘Chemical Castration’ of the American Male . . . ,”


John Kaminski exposes this, stating:

“[Zero Population Growth] was a Jew scam, aimed at depleting the labor pools of the high-tech countries in order to replace the absent population caused by abortion and birth control with low-tech immigrants who could be more easily trained as suitable slaves in the Jewish master plan to control the whole world.  You see the punchline today – Jews saying we need to import Muslims to compensate for our flagging birth rate. . . . Third World immigrants . . . relish the irony of being supported by a government funded by the very people who are being exterminated” (“Our Sick Society Eagerly Creates Sick Children,” 5/20/16, p.1,

The Jews in power allow the Muslims to mock Americans and Europeans for having fewer children due to their “impotence.”  “In a shocking interview, Pope Francis . . . said Muslim migrants must breed with Europeans to counter ‘declining birth rates’” (“Pope Francis Likens Jesus to ISIS, says Muslims Must Breed with Europeans,” 5/19/16,   Note that the Pope used the word “breed” instead of “mate” or “marry,” implying that we are animals.  Top Imam Sheikh Muhammad Ayed stated:  “’Europe has become old and decrepit and needs human reinforcement. . . . [T]hey have lost their fertility, so they look for fertility in our midst.  We will give them fertility!  We will breed children with them . . .’” (Ibid.).  He arrogantly assumes that we want or need their men to have sex with our women, often through gang rape, with no responsibility for any resulting pregnancies.  Unrestrained sex with “infidels” is, of course, one of the major perks of being a Muslim which men are only too happy to do as an obligation of their religion, oblivious to the sexual diseases which they may acquire or the physical and emotional trauma that they inflict on their victims.  Another perk of Islam is being allowed to have sex with, and/or get married to, children.

The truth is, however, that the Muslims are damaged goods, a dying and decaying race, and are unfit to reproduce.  

In most parts of the non-western world, families prefer sons over daughters since a girl’s parents have to provide a dowry, so daughters are viewed as liabilities that can impoverish families.  Thus, abortion and female infanticide are quite common.  The second option is to allow infidels to go to the expense of raising daughters who can then be captured for sexual or other purposes by Muslims.  The third option is to keep money in the family by inbreeding.

We read in “1,400 Years of Inbreeding” (5/21/16,

“The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity and health.  Per [Nikolai] Sennels [a Danish psychologist who has researched this extensively], close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred.  In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70% [,] . . . . 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. . . While Pakistanis are responsible for 3% of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects. . . .

“Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns.  Per Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10 – 16 points off their IQ . . . The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as ‘retarded,’ increases by an astonishing 400% among children of cousin marriages. . . . ‘The ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world’ . . . . Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book. . . . One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education . . . . Studies indicated that 64% of school-children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system” (p.2).

To give one example of the low intellectual ability of Muslims, one Lockheed employee who was assigned to Saudi Arabia said that “most Saudi pilot trainees had very limited night vision, even on the brightest of moonlit nights.  Their training retention rate was minimal . . . Some had dim memories and had to be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before. . . It actually took Muslim C-130 pilots years before they could fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a city” (Ibid., p.1).  Yet we’re supposed to believe that Saudis were able to fly into the World Trade Centers at a speed, height, and angle which John Lear, an expert pilot, said would have been impossible for even him to do.

Despite the adverse effects of inbreeding, this practice will never be given up by the Muslim world since their prophet Muhammad sanctioned it 1,400 years ago.  It doesn’t seem to matter to Muslim men that their wives have to spend most of their time caring for children with birth defects and learning disabilities.  However, by living in Europe or America, they have the advantage of receiving financial help from the government (at infidel expense) to care for and teach their disabled children.  Is it any wonder that they prefer bigger government that provides more free services as opposed to smaller government with fewer benefits and services?  Of course, Muslims are glad to take us up on our offer of caring for them at our expense without any reservations or restrictions, at least until they decide it’s time to kill their benefactors. 

Inbreeding is not the only thing that has harmed the genes of Muslims.  England, Australia, and Israel joined the U.S. in using thousands of tons of depleted uranium weaponry in Iraq.  The world’s largest corporations in the military-industrial complex, such as Alliant and General Dynamics, produce D.U. shells.  Tied to the military and engaged in building nuclear reactors are industry giants such as General Electric and Hitachi.  Depleted uranium (D.U.) is a “waste product” of the nuclear industry with a half-life of 4.5 billion years.  One Senate committee (circa 1995) found that 65% of the children conceived by Gulf War veterans have severe birth defects.  Thus, we can assume that the people who live in Saudi Arabia, Iraq, etc. have all been exposed to depleted uranium and that this is also contributing to birth defects in their children.  Depleted uranium dust will continue to be a hazard in Iraq and the surrounding countries for billions of years, and it is in their air, water, and food products.

Doctors in Fallujah have noted a steep rise in severe congenital birth defects, including babies being born with two heads, one eye, multiple tumors, facial and body deformities, extra toes and/or fingers, and complex nervous system problems.  In Basra, there is a high rate of neural tube defects (open back) and hydrocephalus (water on the brain).

Filters in gas masks do not protect anyone from exposure from D.U., because one billion fine particles fill the period at the end of a sentence.  Small particles less than one micron in diameter are carried up into the atmosphere and are transported around the world (see “Letter from Lauren Moret to Rep. Jim McDermott,” 2/21/03, p.2).  Depleted uranium is slowly contaminating the whole planet, poisoning the whole human gene pool.  “The rate of radiation exposure from one very small particle can be more than is allowed for a whole body exposure in one year . . .” (Ibid., p.6).  “The combination of radiation with heavy metals, chemicals and biological toxins accelerate and increase the adverse health effects of exposure.  The effects are unknown since very little research exists in this field” (Ibid., p.3).  The question is, if it was so important to defeat the enemy decisively in the Mideast by using D.U., why did the U.S. government then create ISIS and supply them with weapons and training?  Why is the U.S. government bringing Jihadist “refugees” to our land to contaminate us with the D.U. excreted from their bodies and burden taxpayers with the costs of surgeries and special education?  How will vaccines, chemtrails, GMO foods, Obamacare, and genetically-impaired “refugees” with exotic diseases help make us more secure in our health and healthier as a nation?

Perhaps the following will explain why:

“’. . . [I]n the contemporary warfare arena where experts in biological chemical warfare convene and discuss the ways that are ideal to conduct warfare today, to really take an enemy out, you don’t want to kill the people.  You want to produce people who are chronically ill and become dependent on the state and totally sap the resources of the country.  And then you can move in with your military-medical-industrial complex and your international medical-pharmaceutical cartel.  Then you sell these defeated countries all of the pharmaceuticals and chemicals that they need to maintain any semblance of healthy function.

“’They’re completely depleted.  They can’t put together a military.  You create a dependence and thereby you weaken the population, and weakened populations are easy to control.  So you’ve got population control, and you make vast fortunes doing it, versus just blowing up a nuclear weapon and devastating the infrastructure that you own.  You and your colleagues own that infrastructure.  You want to get rid of the people.  You don’t want to get rid of infrastructure’” (Paul, “Chemtrail Flu: Have You Got it Yet?,” 1/30/15,, pp. 3-4).

What the Jews in government have done with D.U. has not been done out of stupidity, but out of full knowledge and awareness of the consequences.  The same goes for vaccines, chemtrails, and GMOs.  They know exactly what they are doing, and they always give the excuse that what they do is for “national security.”  However, if they are so concerned about our security, why have they armed terrorists and helped them immigrate into our country while calling for Americans to be disarmed?  Why are children who aren’t vaccinated refused entry into public school when “refugee” children exposed to D.U. and diseases such as T.B. are allowed in?  Why are unvaccinated children more of a threat to the medical system than diseased “refugees” and illegals?

“Due to Barack Obama’s reckless immigration policy and lack of sufficient medical screening for immigrants in the Refugee Resettlement Program, the United States is now seeing deadly diseases make a comeback.  Those diseases include Tuberculosis, paralysis-causing acute flaccid myelitis, dengue fever, swine flu, [leprosy,] and enterovirus D68 . . .” (“’Give Me Your Diseased, Your Murderers, And I Will Give You America’ – The New Motto of this Government as it Destroys the Country from Within!,” 5/29/16,

Inviting millions of immigrants into western nations who in most cases can’t speak English and have no desire to adopt our laws, religion, or culture will only result in violent clashes between us.  Muslims view Western men as effeminate since we don’t completely control the lives of our women.  To them, freedom among women reflects the loss of our manhood and, of course, is contrary to their religion as well, so Muslims are eager to put our women in place (subservient) where they supposedly belong.  This is done by raping them to get them used to accepting the fact that they don’t own their own bodies and that they exist for the pleasure of men and must do as they are told.  Allowing males to use the same bathrooms as females is an open invitation for rape as Arabs already despise Western females for dressing “provocatively,” which to their way of thinking means they want to be raped, and the Arabs are most happy to oblige since it costs them nothing, will not result in being arrested and prosecuted, and promises them a good time.

Muslims have been raised in totalitarian, male-dominated cultures in which they have been governed by fear, not love or compassion, and personal sovereignty is out of the question.  Chivalry (especial courtesy and high-minded disinterested consideration to women) is an unknown concept.  Thus, they cannot tolerate or accept the freedoms that we have in Western Civilization, and they certainly are not ready to accept equality between the sexes since enslavement of women was practiced as a given by the founder of their religion and since Muslim men want to be able to satisfy their lusts at all times, even in the afterlife.

Since it is common for girls to be aborted or killed at birth, there is a growing problem of millions of young men coming of age with shrinking chances of marriage.  A rising population of frustrated single men spells trouble and is one of the incentives of waging jihad against “infidels.”  Stories of rape and trafficking women as slaves or prostitutes are increasing.  Oddly enough, however, while feminists in America continue to deplore the White “patriarchal” system as being destructive and unfair to women, they don’t make a peep regarding the way Muslims treat women.