FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

CAFR1 IN REPLY TO STEWART REEVES POST

Walter Burien

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

Sept. 30, 2013

Stewart:

Do the math from the figures: For TX - AZ - NM - CA:  The average per year is about 370,000 illegal crossings per year into the US. So a ten-year total would be 3.7 million as a low number being that 2000 to 2007 the overall numbers were significantly higher due to a robust economy during that time period.

At 3.7 million, that equates to almost 1.2% of the population of the United States (313.9 million in 2012) or about 1.3% if looking from 2000 where the population of the US was 287.6 million.

In 1960 the population of the US was 180.7 million SOURCE: https://www.google.com/#q=what+is+the+population+of+the+united+states

If you look at 1920 the population was 106.5 million. It would be interesting to do the math to figure out what percentage of the current population was due to illegal immigration since 1920 factoring in for the birth rate of the same over that time period.

I note the GDP in 1960 as seen in the link above was 520.5 billion dollars and the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) come 2012 was 15.68 trillion dollars, or about a 3000% increase over that time period. 

Just in dollars and not accounting for inflation, the average dollar allocation based on GDP per person in the US for 1960 was (population 180.7) divided into (GDP 520.5 billion dollars) =  $2880.46 average per person.  Now come 2012 (population 313.9) divided into (GDP 15.68 trillion dollars) = $49,952.21 or a 1734% increase of dollar average from 1960 to 2012.

Now if my memory serves me correctly, back in 1960 an annual income of $2880 was on the low side ($240 per month) for the middle class US resident, and come the year 2012 a $49,952 annual income for the middle class resident seems to be on the high side ($4,162 per month).

Now there is one class of resident where that average could be considered the standard, or even on the low side... Definitely federal government employees and a very large percentage of local government employees. Additionally for those government employees about 1.4 to 2 million dollars "each" is put aside for and in their pensions. I note most government pensions are strictly participatory where the government owns 100% of the fund's balance and the government employee in so many words has a "ticket to ride" under contract as you would when you buy a train ticket to go from point "A" to point "B". You get a ticket to ride but do not own one piece of the train.

When looking at the fundamental numbers from 1960 to 2012, illegal immigration and the government pension crises to me don't seem to be the core problem we are all facing. I would say the core issue is the personal debt issue and reduced private sector personal income that has been thrust on all of our backs. The common denominator it appears to be: Government growth and government's perpetual increase in "the take".

** What would have happened if government had created and built from 1960 to 2012 a fiduciary trust principle of operation (like a pension fund) that was designed to generate the revenue that had the specific goal of replacing all taxation (the revenue source from the fiduciary trusts on the local and Federal levels replaced taxation where taxation was taken out of the picture in its entirety).

Can you see the US as the strongest economic power on earth?

Can you see your personal income and maintained wealth being substantially greater than it is now?

Can you see in end result a smaller more efficient government?

Can you see a better world in general where "all" are thriving?

Can you see those that rocked the boat of a very stable, profitable, and thriving economy for one and all as happened on 911 and in 2008 getting their heads handed to them on a platter being that they just rocked the boat which all from the population; government administrations; and the financial / industrial cartels were very happy and prosperous within?

Anything in God's or Man's world starts with a thought and that thought is then turned into a reality. The thought has been implanted over the last decade with CAFR1's diligent focus and effort to implant that thought. Now is the time to make that thought become a reality. Mr. Smith (CAFR1) is going to DC. Complete funding and in fact funding over the top came in from TX and FL three weeks ago. The CAFR1 DC trip is now being scheduled and when the key components of the trip are locked in, a post will go out to the CAFR1 National email list of the dates and events that will be taking place within the two week DC trip. 

It is time for CAFR1, Walter Burien to apply his best efforts and focus to get the beltway gang's focus and attention churning away to put into motion the economic model of government self-sufficiency without taxation and in-turn setting the roots for growth of a prosperous economy and peoples for all time to come. The start of the millennium can start in our lifetimes. I will do my best to make that happen for: One and All.

We all were given the "gift" of life at birth. The trick is protecting that gift where all are on the same page for the "good" benefit of all. What I am proposing "in reality" will make that happen for the first time in history and hopefully will set the "standard" for all time to come. Smile, you just may have a very good reason to justify that big smile in the very near future.

Sent FYI from,

 

Walter Burien - CAFR1.com

P. O. Box 2112

Saint Johns, AZ 85936

 

Tel. (928) 458-5854

__________________________________

 

 

IN REPLY TO:

__________________________________

From:  "STEWART REEVES"
Subject:  Immigration Texas draws more illegal immigrants, but overall numbers fall in AZ, Calif., & New Mexico
Date:  Mon, September 30, 2013 8:39 am
To:  WalterBurien@CAFR1.com

Immigration Texas draws more illegal immigrants, but overall numbers fall

 

 

(Apprehensions in Border Patrol sectors in Arizona, New Mexico, and California dropped by 238,141, or 57.2 percent, in the same period.)

 

Published 30 September 2013

 

 

 

Border Patrol numbers show that there has been a shift east in recent years in illegal immigration along the Southwest border, with more illegal crosser being apprehended in Texas at the same time that the overall numbers of illegal border crossers falling in other border states. Experts say that a combination of tougher law enforcement in Arizona, a strong Texas economy, and a greater number of Central American immigrants choosing the “relatively closer route” through Texas may be driving the shift.

 

 

Border Patrol numbers show that there has been a shift east in recent years in illegal immigration along the Southwest border, with more illegal crosser being apprehended in Texas at the same time that the overall numbers of illegal border crossers falling in other border states.

 

In fiscal 2009 there were 125,000 people who were caught trying to cross the border from Mexico into Texas. A KTAR reports that as of September 2013, just two weeks before the end of the fiscal 2013, there were 225,548 people who were caught trying to cross into Texas.

 

This is an 80.4 percent increase in five years.

 

Apprehensions in Border Patrol sectors in Arizona, New Mexico, and California dropped by 238,141, or 57.2 percent, in the same period.

 

Experts say that a combination of tougher law enforcement in Arizona, a strong Texas economy, and a greater number of Central American immigrants choosing the “relatively closer route” through Texas may be driving the shift.

 

Michelle Mittelstadt, communication director for the Migration Policy Institute, told KTAR that Mexicans still make up more than half of illegal-entry apprehensions, but that their numbers have been shrinking. She noted that as increasing numbers of Salvadorans, Guatemalans, and Hondurans try to cross the border, coming through Texas would be a geographically more logical choice.

 

Pew Research’s Hispanic Trends Project estimated in a report this week that Mexicans made up 52 percent immigrants who were in the United States illegally in 2012, down from 57 percent in 2007.

 

Mittelstadt said that with fewer Mexicans trying to cross the border, there should be less pressure on Arizona, and that it is not likely that Mexican illegal immigration would increase any time soon.

 

“Central America does not have a population large enough to supplant Mexican migration, and the demographic, educational, and economic trends in Mexico are such that a turnaround in Mexican migration on a large scale remains unlikely,” she said.

 

Raquel Rubio-Goldsmith, coordinator of the University of Arizona’s Binational Migration Institute, told KTAR that it is not surprising that “people would always choose the easiest way they think to come to the country.”

 

James Lyall, staff attorney with American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, said that with illegal crossings at a historical low, “it does not make any sense to spend more money on continued operating that would cause hundreds of deaths.”

 

He said that “investing millions of dollars on a continued exponentially growing” border patrol is a questionable policy when illegal crossings are at a historical low.