“PUBLIC LAW 102-14

 

From:  Phoenix Journal #67 “The Beast at Work”, pp. 170-174 by Ceres (Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn/Aton)

(QUOTING, Eustace Mullins, RAPE OF JUSTICE)

This Resolution was titled “A JOINT RESOLUTION  to DESIGNATE MARCH 26, 1991 AS EDUCATION DAY, U.S.A.”  It was introduced in the House of Representatives by Robert H. Michel (R-IL) and co-sponsored by Richard Gephardt (D-MO).  It was then co-sponsored by 224 more Congressmen.  Congressman Bob Stump (R-AZ) was one of the 224 co-sponsors.  [C: (Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn):  indeed this is one of the ones where I asked you to write and demand to know how this “voice vote” could have come to be.  I have received copies of many of the return letters which indicate:  “It is none of your business”!]

The real meaning of this law is not spelled out within the law itself but it is very strange that it was introduced, passed and signed by the President in a country whose laws ostensibly originated in the Common Law which comes from the Laws, Statutes and Judgments (Mosaic Laws) of the accepted “Holy Bible”.  As you will discover the Resolution has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with “Education Day”.

[C: (Hatonn) ]As we go through this material ahead please be reminded that we utilize words such as “Jew”, “Jewish”, etc., simply for identification—FOR THE TERM “JEW” WAS 1700’S (18^TH CENTRUY).  THESE ONES IN POINT CAME FROM THE KHAZARIAN TRIBES AND WERE NOT EVEN JUDEAN OR “HEBREW”—THEY FORMED A NEW LANGUAGE CALLED “YIDDISH”, WROTE THE “HUMAN” LAWS CALLED TALMUD AND HAVE GONE ABOUT A PLAN 2000 FOR GLOBAL CONTROL THROUGH WHAT THEY HAVE SINCE IDENTIFIED AS “ZIONISM”.  TO HAVE MEANING AS BROUGHT INTO YOUR ATTENTION WE CANNOT TAKE TIME TO IDENTIFY EACH TIME WE USE TERMS WHICH HAVE SINCE, BY LAW AND/OR USAGE, BECOME EFFECTIVELY THE ACCEPTED TERMINOLOGY.  “ACCEPTED” DOWES NOT MAKE IT CORRECT NOR ACCURATE!]

105 STAT. 44 PUBLICV LAW 102-14—MAR. 20, 1991.

Public Law 102-14

102^nd Congress

JOINT RESOLUTION

Mar. 20, 1991

______________ To designate March 26, 1991, as “Education Day, USA.

[H.J. Res. 104]

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;

Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;

Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;

Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;

Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, “the rebbe”, this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of “education and giving”, the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and

Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state; Now, therefore, be  it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representative of the United States of American in Congress assembled:  That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as “Education Day, U.S.A.”.  The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Approved March 20, 1991.

__________________________________

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. RES. 104:

__________________________________

CONGRESSIONAL RECORED, VOL. 137 (1991)

Mar. 5, considered and passed House

Mar. 7, considered and passed Senate.

[BOTH PASSED BY MEANS OF VOICE VOTE]

Now that the Seven Noahide Laws are the law of the land it should behoove each of us to know and understand what the Seven Laws actually are [C:  You WOULD want to know if the Methodists or Pentecostals passed a public law of the land, would you not?]; what the penalties for disobeying them are and; last but not least, by whom are they to be enforced.  Yours truly is still waiting for the “governmental” answers to this most important issue from his written request to both Congressmen Michel and Stump.  While waiting for their answers I tried to find out on my own what this “Public Law 102-14” is all about.

If you are curious and inquisitive I’d like to share with you what I found.  The following is not easy or light reading.  It actually requires a totally different mind-set than that to which we are accustomed; e.g., to catch a thief one must think as a thief; or, put oneself in their stead.

The following spells out the Seven Noahide Laws: the Lubavitch movement; the ‘rebbe’; and Rabbi Schneerson.  It was all gathered in context from the Judaica encyclopedia, a Jewish publication.  I could find but a mere mention in a few other publications but not enough to properly answer the question.

May your discernment prevail and, as you read, continuously ask yourself WHY did our “government” pass this law so swiftly and with only a voice vote??

You will notice in the Whereases above it states many times ethical values and principles.  This is very important because in the sixth “Whereas” it states unequivocally where they were fostered and promoted.  You’ll also notice it is NOT from common law or Christian principles and Biblical Laws.  In essence, you’ll discover, if you are in complete honesty with yourself, that Public Law 102-14 legal and POLITICALLY JUDAIZED THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN WITH A BABYLONIAN TALMUDIC RELIGION KNOWN AS JUDAISM AND IN TOTAL VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO OUR CONSTITUTION WHICH STATES:  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;…..”  This is what the media, and all anti-Christian proponents want us to believe is “Separation of Church and State.”

You’ll also notice in the ninth “whereas” it is to go international with other heads of state signing.  Is this just coincidental with the Messianic Age (One World Government under Zionism) that Jewry is zealously waiting, or was it deliberately planned that way?  Consider the removal of The Ten Commandments from our so-called public schools.  If all this doesn’t  total up for cause of concern for all of us then we definitely deserve what they (the oneworlders) have planned for us.

FROM THE JUDAICA ENCYCLOPEDIA

“NOACHIDE LAWS, The seven laws considered by rabbinic tradition as the minimal moral duties enjoined by the Bible on all men (Sanh. 56-60; Yad, Melakhim, 8:10, 10:12 [Babylonian Talmud])  Jews are obligated to observe the whole Torah, while every non-Jew is a “son of the covenant of Noah” (see Gen. 9), and he who accepts its obligations is  a ger-toshav (“resident-stranger” or even “semi-convert”) (See Av. Zar. 64b; Maim, Yad, Melakhim8:10.). Maimonides equates the righteous man (Ihasid) of the [gentile] nations who has a share in the world to come even without becoming a Jew with the gentile who keeps these laws.  Such a man is entitled to full material support from the Jewish community (see ET, 6 (19540, co. 289 s.v. ger toshav) and to the highest earthly honors (Sefer Hasidim [1957], 358).  The seven noachide laws as traditionally enumerated are;  the prohibitions of idolatry, blasphemy, bloodshed, sexual sins, theft, and eating from a living animal, as well as the injunction to establish a legal system (Tosefl, Av., Zar, 8:4: Sanh. 56a).  Except for the last, all are negative, and the last itself is usually interpreted as commanding the enforcement of the others (Maim. Yad, Melakhim, 9:1)  (Ed. Note:  For an in depth discussion please see the PHOENIX JOURNAL:  “MARCHING TO ZION”.  (End Quoting)

**************

(PHB:  Further explanation of the Noahide Laws )

**************

The Noahide Laws – U.S. Public Law 102-14

Phoenix Journal #88 “Advanced Demolition Legion: The ADL in Action”,

p. 7-11 (By Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn)

Quoting: Gen. Jack Mohr

Public Law 102-14, has become known as THE NOAHIDE LAW AND FORERUNNER OF THE NEW WORLD RELIGION. It was signed into law, while most Americans sat glued to their TV sets, watching the aftermath of Desert Storm. Most Americans do not know that it exists, and it was given very little coverage on TV or by the media.

It was introduced to Congress by Robert H. Michel, (R-IL) on Jan. 31, 1991, as EDUCATION DAY, U.S.A. and was passed by a House voice vote on March 5, and a voice vote by the Senate on March 7.

If you are interested in a full discussion of these NOAHIDE LAWS, write to JUBILEE, Editor Paul Hall, P. O. Box 310 Midpines, CA 91325 and ask him for their article on these laws. Be sure to send a contribution to cover cost or printing and mailing.

The first paragraph of this resolution would lead the reader to believe that Congress was RE-ESTABLISHING LONG LOST BIBLICAL ETHICS AND PRINCIPLES. But paragraph two REFERS TO THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS and states that unless we recognize THESE LAWS, civilization will return to “Chaos”. The eighth paragraph promises to return, not only the United States, but all the world to obedience of these Laws.

The DANGER lies in the face that these NOAHIDE LAWS and their origin ARE UNDEFINED. Nothing is said in these laws as to why representatives of this nation should enact laws in honor of an obscure Jewish Rabbi….

THE LAWS

Briefly these Laws are:

1. Thou shalt not engage in idol worship. [ Hatonn: Good!]

2. Thou shalt not blaspheme God. [Excellent!]

3. Thou shalt not shed innocent blood. [Oops? So it’s ok to shed non-innocent blood” How about WHO DECIDES innocence or guilt?]

4. Thou shalt not engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous or homosexual relations. [ Will this one sell in Hollywood—even from a RABBI?]

5. Thou shalt not steal. [ No comment! Surely no Jew would consider stealing—at least not until AFTER THE KOL NIDRE!]

6. Thou shalt establish laws and courts of law to administer these laws, including the death penalty for those who kill, with one witness establishing the fact.

7. Thou shalt not be cruel to animals.

These should sound honorable to nice people, even Christians with the one exception of the death penalty. According to the Bible, there must be at least two witnesses (see Deut. 19:15).

The Encyclopaedia Judaica clearly states that “The sons of Noah (Noahites) in rabbinic usage applies to all humans EXCEPT Jews.” It specifically states that Christians and Muslims are NOAHITES.

These laws are approved in the Jewish TALMUD, and are not Biblically based.

While Noahites are not Jews, they must follow these seven laws of Noah, as written in the Talmud…in the Talmud, Kallah 1b (18b) it states that “Jesus was conceived by a demon spirit who had intercourse with Mary while she was menstruating” [H: Oh? Miracles never cease to amaze me….]

It is also interesting to note the close connection between the Noahide Laws and Freemasonry. Webster’s New International Dictionary, 2nd Edition states that “One who has taken the 21st degree of the Scottish Rite, called by its possessors, not a degree, but the ‘Very Ancient Order of Noahites’.”

So what President Bush signed into law in 1991 was in essence Judaism and Freemasonry. What ever became of their proclaimed “separation of religion and state” as demanded by THEM?

The enforcement of these laws has caused much debate in rabbinic circles. But even a partial evaluation, makes it obvious that Judaism means to enforce these laws on non-Jews, in Jewish courts, when PAX JUDICA becomes a reality, as they predict. [H: Well, Koresh played it both ways—being a Jewish-Christ. Now that takes consideration does it not? He also broke the seven laws—BUT, he still was a cool character who disallowed the “figuring out” of just WHAT TO ENFORCE AGAINST HIM—SO IN NOT KNOWING—JUST BURN THEM ALL BACK TO THE HELL THEY WERE GOING TO BE SENT TO ANYWAY BY THESE NEW RULERS!]

The Talmud, in Sanhedrin 56a-59b, shows clearly that the NOAHIDE LAWS were intended solely for the control of non-Jews, living under Jewish jurisdiction. Christians, etc., can see what is in store for them, if a Jewish New World Order ever becomes a reality.

The question we need to ask, is whether Americans today are living under a Jewish jurisdiction? I believe the evidence shows that we are. The great majority of judges and lawyers in our justice system are Jews, and this makes it extremely difficult for Christians to obtain justice if they come before a Jew controlled court. The Anti-Defamation League, of the Jewish B’nai B’rith, an entity of a foreign government, is operating illegally in our system, and has for all intents and purposes become a part of our Justice System.

The NOAHIDE LAWS call for an establishment of Jew run courts to try non-Jews--since Jews are exempt from these Noahide laws.

This means that Jews are exempt from blasphemy, murder of a non-Jew (even a fetus in a Jew run and owned aboratorium), in fact all Noahide laws. [H: Ah, but General, sir, the ability to do all of this and then lie about it and get cover-up all is sheltered with the WONDROUS OATH OF “VOW OF ALL VOWS”, THE KOL NIDRE. So--what’s new?]

While these laws on the surface appear to be moral, it is a matter of JEWISH interpretation. To the Jew, a Christian or other becomes an idolater if he wears the symbol of the cross. The Noahide sentence? Decapitation! To the Jews, a Christian becomes a blasphemer if he equates Jesus as being God. The sentence? Decapitation! The TALMUD, in Abodah Zoray, (78) goes so far as to declare that all Christian churches are places of idolatry. The Noahide sentence? Decapitation! This possibly explains Rev. 20:4 where John speaks about the “souls of those who were beheaded for their witness to Jesus and the Word of God.” You Judeo-Christians who are supporting the anti-Christ’s of Judaism as God’s Chosen had better wake up to this fact before you become victims of those you seek to aid! For this is the direction the Christian world is heading, if we come under Jewish control.

Law Four of the Noahides, prohibits rape, homosexuality, adultery, beastiality and incest in NON-JEWS, while the Jews are EXEMPT from these restriction and in the Talmud are taught that a non-Jew woman can be treated “like a piece of raw meat” by a Jewish man. Doesn’t it seem strange to you, that our government is promoting these Jewish laws which seem to be against Sodom and immorality, while it is mostly Jewish teachers who are encouraging sodomy and immorality in our schools and in the media?

Law Five echoes the 8th Law of “our” Ten Commandments, “Thou shalt not steal!” Yet the Talmud, (Choschen Ham. [226.1]), states that the Jews may keep lost property belonging to non-Jews, and that they may keep overpayments made by non-Jews and may charge “them” usury.

Law Six calls for the establishment of International United Nations tribunals for the enforcing of Jewish Laws.

Why is a nation, based on Christianity, adopting Talmudic laws, when we already have the Ten Commandments of God, His statues and judgments?

Patrick Henry put his finger squarely on the truth when he said: “It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often, that this great nation was founded not by religionists, but by Christians. Not on a religion, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ.” [H: Please NOTE CAREFULLY that this says on the “….gospel of Jesus Christ….” That means on the “teachings” (“story” of Christ-ness). Your nation was not based or founded on a “Jesus” (pronouced Hay-soos) in Latino! Your nation was TO HAVE BEEN FOUNDED on the TRUTH OF GOD! You, however, broke covenant the minute you stole and by force deprived the native American of even one inch of his lands.] Why are our leaders so anxious to change his (Patrick Henry's ideology) into a heathen ideology? (End Quoting)