From:  http://www.fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J050.pdf

REC #2 HATONN

SUN., MAY 31, 1992 4:09 P.M. YEAR 5, DAY 289

SUNDAY, MAY 31, 1992

Let us continue exactly where we left off for both documents can be merged into one.

“What passed at this terrible Congress will never be known to the outside world, for even those men who had been drawn unwittingly into the movement, and now heard for the first time the real designs of the leaders, were under oath to reveal nothing. One honest Freemason, the Comte de Virieu, when questioned on the “tragic secrets” he had brought back with him, replied: ‘I will not confide them to you. I can only tell you that all this is very much more serious than you think. The conspiracy which has been woven is so well thought out that it will be, so to speak, impossible for the Monarchy and the Church to escape from it.’ From that time on, says his biographer, M. Costa de Beauregard, ‘the Comte de Virieu could only speak of Freemasonry with horror.’” (WORLD REVOLUTION, Webster, p. 18.)

People became intensely interested in the activities of the Illuminati as a result of information leaking out regarding their diabolical plans. In 1785, four more leading members of the Illuminati left the Society and testified before a Court of Inquiry called by the Elector of Bavaria. Their startling evidence removed all doubt regarding the Satanic nature of Illuminism. On the 11th of October, 1785, the Bavarian authorities raided Zwack’s house and discovered a mountainous array of Illuminati documents which showed quite clearly that they planned to bring about a “universal revolution that should deal the death-blow to society....THIS REVOLUTION WILL BE THE WORK OF THE SECRET SOCIETIES, AND THAT IS ONE OF OUR GREAT MYSTERIES.”

ILLUMINATI COMES TO AMERICA

The Order of the Illuminati started when the American Revolution was already under way, and therefore played no significant part in it. However, before the Colonies were united, the Constitution adopted, and our Republic established, fifteen lodges of the Order of the Illuminati were formed in the thirteen Colonies. The Columbian Lodge of the Order of the Illuminati was established in New York City in 1785. Members included Governor DeWitt Clinton [H: Yes indeedy, there is a direct connection.], and later Clinton Roosevelt, Charles Dana and Horace Greeley. The following year a lodge was established in Virginia with which was identified Thomas Jefferson. When Weishaupt’s diabolical plans were exposed by the Bavarian government, Jefferson strongly defended him as an “enthusiastic philanthropist”.

Many strong warnings were issued about the Activities of the Illuminati in America. On July 19th, 1798, David Pappen, President of Harvard University, issued a strong warning to the graduating class and lectured them on the influence Illuminism was having on the American scene. President Timothy Dwight of Yale University issued a similar warning.

Also, in 1798, George Washington sent a letter to G.W. Snyder in which he stated: “It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea I meant to convey was that I did not believe the Lodges of Freemasons in this country had, as societies, endeavored to propagate the diabolical tenets...” [H: I believe you can agree that most men starting out in such a society or “Order” do not understand the intent and certainly not the total enslavement of such an association. But as ones reach powerful places within the working order of government where great impact can be wielded—the oaths and promises are very strongly brought to their attention. Perhaps it can best be explained as “selling your soul to the devil in exchange for success and wealth!”]

One year later, Professor John Robison published his famous PROOFS OF A CONSPIRACY in which he warned the world of Illuminati infiltration of Masonic Lodges.

MASONIC SYMBOLS IN WASHINGTON D.C.STREET LAYOUT

[H: THIS IS IMPORTANT]

A curious piece of the Masonic conspiracy puzzle in the founding of America is the actual street layout for our Capital City, Washington, D.C. Remember, 53 of the original signers of the Declaration of Independence were Masons. The city was laid out in the form of KEY Masonic Symbols, the Square, the Compass, the Rule, and the Pentagram. [See map page 47 of Phoenix Jouranl #50 at http://www.fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J050.pdf.]  OR (Go to:  http://www.geocities.com/jussaymoe/dc_symbolism/).

Take any good street map of downtown Washington, D.C. and find the Capitol Building. Facing the Capitol from the Mall and using the Capitol as the head or top of the Compass, the left leg is represented by Pennsylvania Avenue and the right leg by Maryland Avenue. The Square is found in the usual Masonic position with the intersection of Canal Street and Louisiana Avenue. The left leg of the Compass stands on the White House and the right leg stands on the Jefferson Memorial, the circle drive and short streets behind the Capitol form the head and ears of what Satanists call the Goat of Mendes or Goat’s Head.

On top of the White House is an inverted 5-pointed star, or Pentagram. The point is facing South in true occult fashion. It sits within the intersections of Connecticut and Vermont Avenues, north to Dupont and Logan Circles, with Rhode Island and Massachusetts going to Washington Circle to the West and Mt. Vernon Square on the East. [H: Chelas, don’t blame me for what you are now FORCED to observe—I didn’t do it! However, it is right there for the entire world to see in clearly planned and orchestrated intent.]

The Washington Monument stands in perfect line to the intersecting point of the form of the Masonic Square, stretching from the House of the Temple to the Capitol Building. Within the hypotenuse of that righttriangle sit many of the headquarter buildings for the most powerful departments of government, such as the Justice Department, the U.S. Senate, and the Internal Revenue Service.

It would be great to know that our Capitol is bathed in continual prayer, and to believe that its buildings and monuments have been dedicated in prayer, but do you realize that EVERY KEY Federal building, from the White House to the Capitol Building, has had a cornerstone laid in a Masonic ritual and had specific Masonic paraphernalia placed in each one? If we were talking about the one true God, it would be wonderful; this is NOT the case. The cornerstones of all these buildings have been laid in Masonic ritual, dedicated to the demonic god of Masonry, Jao-Bul-On. That is the secret name of the Masonic god, the “Lost Word” in the rite of the Royal Arch degree. “Jao” is the Greek name for the god of the Gnostics, laldebaoth or lao. “Bul” is a rendering of the name of Ba’al and “On” is the Babylonian name of Osiris. What we see represented in this name of the Masonic deity is a three-headed pagan deity that is blasphemous to a Christian. [H: If, indeed, there were any true “Christians” left anywhere!] The ritual and full explanation is found in DUNCAN’S MASONIC RITUAL AND MONITOR, (Third Edition, pp. 224-6, 249-51).

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION-1796

In 1796, John Adams, who had been instrumental in organizing Masonic Lodges in New England, decided to oppose Thomas Jefferson in his bid for the presidency. He made a major issue of the fact that Jefferson, who had been minister to France, 1785-1789, and was frankly sympathetic to the Illuminist-fomented Reign of Terror, was using Masonic lodges for subversive purposes. [H: Ah, some of you astute readers who begin to add two and two come with three about now as you demand to know about the ”Jefferson Bible” and why I have given you leave to read it in preference to ”The” King James Version of the so-called “Bible”. Because it is still more nearly correct in the New Testament version than is the accepted and orthodox version. Furthermore, the intent was to appear to be Godly to the point of being even considered a heretic regarding the “tampering”. You will further note, however, that no attention was paid whatsoever other than to have it pronounced by the Elite of the day in point as being quite brilliant! You simply cannot imagine what your Constitution would look like if there had not been a few of US, including Germain, at the writing of the document. The “founders” had to capitulate to keep their cover on—knowing full well that you-the-people would eventually INSIST that the document be changed and obsoleted.]

John Quincy Adams wrote three letters to Colonel William L. Stone giving details of the charges. The information contained in these letters is credited with winning John Adams (his father) the presidency. The existence of these letters was first brought to the public’s attention by Commander William Guy Carr in his book, PAWNS IN THE GAME. Until recently they were in the Rittenburg Square Library in Philadelphia. They have now mysteriously vanished. [H: My goodness, lots of things disappear from around Philadelphia, like all the files regarding the mismanagement of HUD wherein multi-millions of your money somehow disappeared into the pockets of a few politicians. Also like the documents and files “lost” in investigation of the Congressional Committee on Banking and the mess with the Iraq arms deals and shunting of BILLIONS of dollars into the pockets of ones as high as Bush himself, not to mention the Twiglets.]

THE WILLIAM MORGAN MURDER

In 1826 William Morgan decided it was his duty to inform his fellow Masons and the American public regarding the Illuminati and their secret plans. Morgan, “who had passed through all the degrees of Masonry and held a very high position in the Order” began to write a book on the subject. He arranged with a printer in Batavia to have it published. He “was engaged in completing it when he was arrested on a false charge of larceny. His house was searched and his manuscripts were seized and destroyed.” A couple of days later he was released from jail “by the interference of some of the conspirators” and kidnapped while on his way home. At a meeting a few days later Morgan was sentenced to die as a traitor.

Five men were selected to carry out the sentence. They were, according to one eye witness, “all men of correct habits and good character, and all, I doubt not, were moved by an enthusiastic but most misguided sense of duty.” They loaded Morgan into a boat and when they had rowed out into Lake Ontario they “wound a rope around him, attaching to each end of it a heavy weight, and threw him overboard.

“The body of Morgan was found a year afterwards...None of the murderers was ever brought to justice”. (IRISH AND ENGLISH FREEMASONS, Gargano, p. 73)

As a result of the public scandal that followed the murder of William Morgan, the Masonic movement in the United States suffered a severe set-back. Nearly 40 percent of the members belonging to the NORTHERN jurisdiction seceded. It is interesting to note in passing that mention of this very important historical event has been deleted from the history books.

ILLUMINATI-COMMUNISM CONNECTION

To trace their activities further, it becomes essential that we look for prominent individuals and groups who adhere to the Satanic tenets of Illuminism. It is “by their fruits” that we will know them. They will all be working toward the attainment of the goal of the Illuminati—the destruction of national sovereignty and the establishment of a One World Government (One World Order), a “Novus Ordo Seclorum”.

In 1829, American Illuminists sponsored a series of lectures in New York by English Illuminist Frances “Fanny” Wright. She advocated the entire Weishauptian program of her auxiliary of the Order of the Illuminati including Communism made more palatable by the label of “equal opportunity and equal rights”, atheism, emancipation of women and free love. Those present were informed that the Illuminati intended to unite the Nihilist and Atheist groups with all other subversive organizations into an international organization to be known as Communism. This new destructive force was to be used by the Illuminati to foment future wars and revolutions. Clinton Roosevelt (a direct ancestor of Franklin D.), Charles Dana and Horace Greeley were appointed a committee to raise funds for this new undertaking.

Has America been flooded with these phrases equal righters and equal opportunity, free love and emancipation of women, since the 1960’s????

END OF QUOTING

Perhaps I should simply leave you to ponder upon these points. There does seem to be no ending to the deceit and foul games played upon you-the-people. How so did it get so integrated with your very lives? You have been given nothing else upon which to build foundation until this day when the awakening few begin to find Truth and document it and other brave and daring citizens project it out unto you of the masses. How would YOU stand in the JUDGING IF IT WERE ON THIS DAY? Ignorance counts in your favor—BUT, refusal to learn counts just as equally against you. I suggest we all pray for a little more “time” and “insight”!

Next, R.B. has sent another document with this attached notation: “Hatonn has mentioned the Constitution on many occasions in the LIBERATOR, in fact if memory serves he was there. I have put over a thousand hours of research on this subject and the I.R.S. I believe this will be helpful to people in understanding the document more thoroughly.”

Yes, it will and so we shall offer it herein. I want you to all remember that first the nation operated under the Federalist Papers. Then while saying, “We will just change a little bit and form this Constitution—THEY went forth into session and COMPLETELY CAST OUT THE PAPERS AND REWROTE ALL OF THE CONSTITUTION. THEY ARE DOING ALL THEY CAN TO DO IT TO YOU AGAIN! HOWEVER, IN THE PROCESS OF CHANGE, MANY THINGS WERE “IMPROVED” GREATLY WHICH NOW GIVES YOU “PATRIOTS” SOME THINGS WITH WHICH TO DEFEND YOURSELVES—SUCH AS LITTLE “u” in united vs. CAPITAL “U” IN UNITED. This deserves a lot of study and perception for the input is subtle indeed.

REGARDING THE FEDERALIST PAPERS

QUOTE:

..... We now go to the Federalist Papers which explain what the words expressed in the Constitution meant, by the very people who helped write them. They are explaining intent. Both the Federalist Papers and the Constitution are in plain English and contain no legal jargon, so they cannot be misunderstood. You must read Federalist Paper 39 wherein it states “...first, in order to ascertain the real character of the government, it may be considered in relation to the foundation—(preamble)—on which it is to be established...”

Now comes the hard part in trying to make you understand and undo what you have been taught, since most of you have never read the Federalist or Anti-federalist papers. [H: I doubt any school children except ones specifically taught elsewhere than the public school system have had more than even a passing mention of same, if at all.] Or for that matter, the Constitutions of your State and the United States. In Federalist Papers 1 through 7, the term United States is never mentioned except for the first sentence in Federalist Paper No. 1. The Framers spoke only of America which was the thirteen colonies (States) as there was no United States yet. These Framers were the people of the Colonies. They were telling the people of America that they were going to form a more perfect Union, NOT a “NEW” Union, by creating first, the United States, which was not one of the Colonies, but a separate entity in itself. They were calling themselves, “We The People” (governing body), of the United States, not the American people of the Confederate States, because they were the originators of the not yet formed United States. But they were, each, one of the people of the colonies.

“We the People”, meant the founding Fathers ONLY, who were the origin (of), or creators of the specific noun (place), fiction, because it had no specific place at the time. They were not talking about the nation comprising the 13 confederate States united, called America, as in the Declaration of Independence. If they were, they would have used the small “u” or the word “these”. So they created the entity called the United States and also a Constitution (agreement/contract) FOR, not OF, the United States belonging to (of) America. This agreement was to protect the people of America from the administrators of the government they were forming. Without your consent, which is a critical term, the administrators have no control over you, except those terms spelled out in the Constitution. They are only: treason in time of war; to provide punishment for counterfeiting the coin (money), (not printed federal reserve notes); to punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas. That’s it, unless you can find any other powers that were granted them in Article 1, Subsection 8, clause 1 through 18.

Patrick Henry’s speech before the Convention on June 4, 1788, was premised that the Sovereign People did not consent to the Framers to represent them, for he said:

“I have the highest veneration of those gentlemen—but, Sir, give me leave to demand, what right had they to say, ‘We the People’. My political curiosity, exclusive of my anxious solicitude for the public welfare, leads me to ask who authorized them to speak the language of, We, the People instead of We, the States? States are the characteristics, and the soul of the confederation. If the States be not the agents of this compact, it must be one great consolidated National Government of the people of all the States....but there are other Gentlemen here, who can give us this information. The people gave them no power to use their name. That they exceeded their power is perfectly clear.”

Read the Anti-Federalist Papers and when you do, you will have to agree that the History books will have to be rewritten on this point. [H: Do you actually believe this would ever happen? I note that if and when another “convention” is called (allowed) you will come out with “districts” called New States and have a “New States Constitution” which is already utilized by the Federal Government—so you have already been had—just awaiting the blood to all drain out!] To prove this, the last eight words of the preamble explains it, wherein they stated that they were going to establish a Constitution for the entity called the United States belonging to America.

The Constitution was drafted in secrecy and the people had no idea what was being done, and this is a fact in history. When the drawing up of the Constitution was completed, people waited outside the convention and asked, when the founding fathers came out, what have you accomplished? Franklin stated, “A Republic if you can keep it.” Does this sound like the people knew what they were doing so they could state ”We the People” which meant all the people? Wasn’t Patrick Henry right?

Another point of grammar shows this to be true and that is the word People was capitalized. It was not a general term people (common noun) but a term referring to a specific class of people. So they capitalized People, thereby making it a proper noun to show the term meant the signers and not the people in general.

If you have a hard time grasping what I am saying then look up the word “of” in the dictionary. Does it not say “belonging to”? It also means “Origin”. Remember, America, the States of the Union, cannot and does not belong to the United States which was formed by the Framers (people) of America who were calling themselves at that time, “We the People of the United States”, for they equated themselves as the origin of the United States. Look up the definition of “United States” in Bouvier’s 1870 Dict. In this instance, the word “of” means Origin. They did not say, “We the people of the united States of America”, did they?

They did create a Constitution (or Contract) FOR the United States which belongs to (of) America. America is the Union of States united by and under the Constitution, as the Hooven Court stated, that ratified the contract in which it was understood the States gave up only limited rights which were enumerated (spelled out) in the main body of the Constitution. The Union was NOT created by the Constitution, only made more perfect. Ha Ha, if this is “more perfect”, let’s go back to the original set-up.

Federalist paper #15 proves my above statements.

“The great and radical vice in the construction of the existing Confederation is in the principle of LEGISLATION for STATES or GOVERNMENTS, in their CORPORATE or COLLECTED CAPACITIES, and as contradistinguished from the INDIVIDUALS of whom they consist. Though this principle does not run through all the powers delegated to the Union, yet it pervades and governs those on which the efficacy of the rest depends. Except as to the rule of apportionment, the United States have an indefinite discretion to make requisitions for men and money; but they have no authority to raise either by regulation extending to the individual citizens of America.” The emphasis in “capitals” are Hamilton’s.

END OF QUOTING

* * *

Let us terminate for this day. Salu.