Jan. 5, 2016

PJ 230

CHAPTER 9

REC #2   HATONN

THU., MAR. 5, 1998    12:06 P.M.    YR. 11, DAY 201

THU.,  MAR. 5,  1998

QUOTING:PART 21, GLOBAL PARASITES

THE ALL-JEWISH MARK ON

"RED RUSSIA"

"In a world of completely organized territorial sovereignties he (the Jew) has only two possible cities of refuge; he must either pull down the pillars of the whole national state system, or he must create a territorial sovereignty of his own... In Eastern Eu­rope, Bolshevism and Zionism seem to grow side by side... not because the Jew cares for the positive side of radical philosophy, not because he desires to be a partaker in Gentile nationalism or Gentile democracy but because no existing Gentile system is ever anything but distasteful to him".

     We shall now briefly interrupt the commentary which we have been making on the Protocols to set at rest once and for all certain misstatements which are made for Gentile consumption.

     To learn what the Jewish leaders of the United States or any other country think, do not read their addresses to the Gentiles; read their addresses to their own people. On such matters as these--Whether the Jew regards himself as destined to rule the world; whether he regards himself as belonging to a nation and race distinct from every other nation and race; whether he re­gards the Gentile world as the legitimate field of his exploitation by a lower moral method than is permissible among his own people; whether he knows and shares the principles of the Pro­tocols--on such matters as these, the only safe guide is to be found in the words which Jewish leaders speak to Jews, not in the words they speak to Gentiles.

     The notable Jewish names which appear oftenest in the Press do not represent the spokesmen of Judaism at all, but only a se­lected few who represent the Department of Propaganda Among the Gentiles. Sometimes that propaganda is in the form of do­nations for Christian charitable organizations; sometimes it is in the form of "liberal" opinion on religious, social and political questions. In whatever form it comes, you may depend upon it that the real activities of the Jewish hierarchy proceed under cover of that which the Gentile is invited to observe and ap­prove.

     The statements offered in this series are never made without the strictest and fullest proof, confirmation and corroboration in the utterances of Jewish leaders. This is one of the strange fea­tures of the multitude of Jewish attacks on this series. They are attacking what they themselves stand for, and their only reason for the attack must be their belief that this investigation has not been able to penetrate through to that which has been kept hidden from the world.

     The most persistent denials have been offered to the state­ment that Bolshevism everywhere, in Russia or the United States, is Jewish. In these denials we have perhaps one of the most brazen examples of the double intent referred to above. The denial of the Jewish character of Bolshevism is made to the Gentile; but in the confidence and secrecy of Jewish communi­cation, or buried in the Yiddish dialect, or obscurely hidden in the Jewish national press, we find the proud assertion made--to their own people!--that Bolshevism is Jewish.

     Jewish propaganda has only two straws to grasp in the terri­ble tale of murder, immorality, robbery, enforced starvation and hideous humanism which make the present Russian situation im­possible to describe and all but impossible to comprehend.

     One of these straws is that Kerensky, the man who eased in the opening wedge of Bolshevism, is not a Jew. Indeed, one of the strongest indications that Bolshevism is Jewish is that the Jewish press emphasizes so fiercely the alleged Gentilism of at least two of the revolutionary notables. It may be cruel to deny them two among hundreds, but merely saying so cannot change Kerensky's nationality. His name is Adler. His father was a Jew and his mother a Jewess. Adler, the father, died, and the mother married a Russian named Kerensky, whose name the young child took. Among the radicals who employed him as a lawyer, among the forces that put him forward to drive the first nail into Russia's cross, among the soldiers who fought with him, his Jewish descent and character have never been doubted.

     "Well, but there is Lenin," our Jewish publicists say--"Lenin, the head of it all, the brains of it all, and Lenin is a Gentile! We've got you there--Lenin is a Gentile"!

     Perhaps he is, but why do his children speak Yiddish? Why are his proclamations put forth in Yiddish? Why did he abolish the Christian Sunday and establish by law the Jewish Saturday Sabbath?

     The explanation of all this may be that he married a Jewess. The fact is that he did. But another explanation may be that he himself is a Jew. Certainly he is not the Russian nobleman he has always claimed to be. The statements he has made about his identity thus far have been lies. The claim that he is a Gentile may be unfounded too.

     No one has ever doubted Trotsky's nationality--he is a Jew. His name is Braunstein. Recently the Gentiles were told that Trotsky had said he wasn't much of anything--in religion. That may be. But still he must be something--else why are the Rus­sian Christian churches turned into stables, slaughter houses and dancing halls, while the Jewish synagogues remain untouched? And why are Christian priests and ministers made to work on the roads, while Jewish rabbis are left their clerical privileges? Trotsky may not be much of anything in religion, but he is a Jew nevertheless. This is not mere Gentile insistence that he shall be considered a Jew whether or no; it is straight Jewish teaching that he is, and is considered by all Jewish authorities to be, a Jew.

     An apology must be made here for repeating well-known facts. Yet, so many people are not even now aware of the true meaning of Bolshevism, at the risk of monotony, we shall cite a few of the salient facts. The purpose, however, is not alone to explain Russia, but to throw a warning light on conditions in the United States.

     The Bolshevik Government, as it stood late this summer when the latest report was smuggled through to certain authori­ties, shows up the Jewish domination of the whole affair. It has changed very slightly since the beginning. We give only a few items to indicate the proportion. It must not be supposed that the non-Jewish members of the government are Russian.

     Very few Russians have anything to say about their own country these days. The so-called "Dictatorship of the Prole­tariat", in which the proletariat has nothing whatever to say, is Russian only in the sense that it is set up in Russia; it is not Rus­sian in that it springs from or includes the Russian people. It is the international program of the Protocols, which might be "put over" by a minority in any country, and which is being given a dress-rehearsal in Russia.

     It is not the economic experiment, so-called, that one objects to in Russia; it is not the fallacies, the sad delusion of the peo­ple. No. It is the downright, dirty immorality, the brutish nas­tiness of it all; and the line which the immorality and nastiness draws between Jew and Gentile. The horrible cruelty involved we will not deal with, leaving it merely with the explanation which has found utterance in the Jewish press that "it may be that the Jew in Russia is taking an unconscious revenge for his centuries of suffering".

     "But," asks some reader, "how may we know that all this is true"?

     Bearing in mind that we are speaking of Russia, not for the interest of the Russian situation at all, but to indicate the inter­national character of those who are responsible for conditions there, and to identify them for the protection of the United States, we shall look at the evidence.

     There is, of course, the evidence brought to light by our own United States Senate and printed in a Report of the Committee on the Judiciary. We do not wish to spend much time on this, because we prefer in these articles to use Jewish testimony in­stead of Gentile. But we shall pause long enough to show the nature of the testimony brought out by our own government.

     Dr. George A. Simons, a clergyman in charge of an Ameri­can congregation in Petrograd at the time the Bolshevik terror broke out, was a witness. Parts of his testimony are given here:

"There are hundreds of agitators who followed in the trail of Trotsky-Bronstein, these men having come over from the lower East Side of New York... A number of us were impressed by the strange Yiddish element in this thing right from the start, and it soon became evident that more than half the agitators in the so-called Bolshevik movement were Yiddish'.

          "Senator Nelson--'Hebrews'?

"Dr. Simons--'They were Hebrews, apostate Jews. I do not want to say anything against the Jews, as such. I am not in sympathy with the anti-Semite movement, never have been, and do not ever expect to be... But I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one of its bases is found in the East Side of New York'.

"Senator Nelson--'Trotsky came over from New York during that summer, did he not'?

Roger E. Simmons--'He did'.

 

"Later Dr. Simons said: 'In December, 1918...out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, and all the rest Jews, with the exception possibly of one man, who is a Negro from America, who calls himself Profes­sor Gordon...and 265 of this northern commune govern­ment that is sitting in the Old Smolny Institute came from the lower East Side of New York--265 of them.

"'I might mention this, that when the Bolsheviki came into power, all over Petrograd we at once had a predomi­nance of Yiddish proclamations, big posters, and every­thing in Yiddish. It became very evident that now that was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians, of course, did not take very kindly to it"'.

[H: Please recall from prior JEWISH writings that Yiddish is NOT Hebrew. Yiddish is a language created for the self-styled parties who came to call themselves Jews and to suit the needs of the TALMUD AND BE UTILIZED IN THE PROTOCOLS. It is much like using a code as in World War II when Native language was used and could not be deciphered. How much to you think, as a Russian, you might understand of Lakota Sioux? By using the Talmud and Yiddish--everyone, including the Hebrew-speaking Jews, could be fooled until it was too late to change horses.]

     William Chapin Huntington, who was commercial attache of the United States Embassy at Petrograd, testified:

"In Russia it is well known that three-fourths of the Bolshevik leaders are Jewish... There were some--not many, but there were some--real Russians; and what I mean by real Russians is Russian-born, and not Russian Jews".

     Roger E. Simmons, Trade Commissioner connected with the United States Department of Commerce, also testified. An im­portant anonymous witness, whom

the committee permitted to withhold his name, told the same things.

     The British White Book, Russia, No. 1--"a Collection of Re­ports on Bolshevism in Russia, presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty, April, 1919". contains masses of the same testimony from many sources, all of them eyewitnesses.

     In that very highly respected magazine Asia for February-March 1920, is an article which contains, among other impor­tant ones, these statements: (the italics are ours)

"In all the Bolshevist institutions the heads are Jews. The Assistant Commissar for Elementary Education, Grunberg, can hardly speak Russian. The Jews are suc­cessful in everything and obtain their ends. They know how to command and get complete submission. But they are proud and contemptuous toward everyone, which strongly excites the people against them... At the present time there is a great national religious fervor among the Jews. They see in the spread of revolution the fulfilling of the Scriptures: 'Though I make an end of all the nations, whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make an end of thee".

     Now, if Gentile proof were wanted, the files of The Dear­born Independent for a whole year would not begin to contain it. But Jewish proof is better.

     There has been a strange vacillation in Jewish opinion con­cerning Bolshevism. At first it was hailed with delight. There was no concealment whatever in the early days of the new regime as to the part which Jewry had in it. Public meetings, interviews, special articles poured forth in which very valuable elements of truth were mingled. There was no attempt at con­cealment of names.

     Then the horror of the thing began to take hold upon the world, and for just a breathing space Jewish opinion fell silent. There was a spasmodic denial or two. Then a new burst of glo­rification. The glorification continues within Judaism itself, but it now carries on the Gentile side of its face a very sad expres­sion labeled "persecution".

     We have lived to see the day when to denounce Bolshevism is to "persecute the Jews".

     In the American Hebrew, for September 10, 1920, an article appears which not only acknowledges and explains the part which the Jew plays in the present unrest and upheaval, but jus­tifies it--and justifies it, curiously enough, by The Sermon on the Mount.

     The writer says that "the Jew evolved organized capitalism with its working instrumentality, the banking system."

     This is very refreshing, in view of the numerous Jewish de­nials of the economic fact

     "One of the impressive phenomena of the impressive time is the revolt of the Jew against the Frankenstein which his own mind conceived and his own hand fashioned..." If this is true, why is Jewish "organized capital with its working instrumental­ity, the banking system" supporting the revol

     "That achievement (referring to the Russian overthrow), des­tined to figure in history as the overshadowing result of the World War, was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking, of Jewish discontent, of Jewish effort to reconstr

     "This rapid emergence of the Russian revolution from the de­structive phase and its entrance into the constructive phase is a conspicuous expression of the constructive genius of Jewish dis­content."

     (This, of course, requires proof that the constructive phase has appeared. The implication here is sheer propaganda. The Protocols, however, have a reconstructive program. We have not reached it as yet in this series of articles, but it is clearly outlined in the Protocols--DESTROY GENTILE SOCIETY, and then reconstruct IT ACCORDING TO "OUR" PLANS). [H: And keep in mind: There are two kinds of people by Jewish demand: JEWS AND GENTILES--period!]

     Now read carefully:

     "What Jewish idealism and Jewish discontent have so pow­erfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind and heart ARE TENDING TO PROMOTE IN OTHER COUNTRIES".

     Trsf yjy shsom/ Ejsy zkreodj ofrs;od, smf zkreodj fodvp­myrmy/// [H: We are stopped here because the worst has happened--fingers on the wrong keys and sometimes I think it is suitable to laugh at self and then move on. Sometimes we have almost a full page of this "alien" writing, and like all things mysterious, it is not mystical, and once discovered is no longer a mystery. So, to try again please.]

     Read that again. "What Jewish idealism and Jewish discon­tent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia!" Just what was that? And just how did it "powerfully con­tribute"? And why are "Jewish idealism" and "Jewish discon­tent" always linked together? If you read the Protocols it is all very clear. Jewish idealism is the destruction of Gentile society and the erection of Jewish society. Was it not so in Russia?--Yiddish proclamations on the walls, the ancient Hebrew in the schools, Saturday substituted for Sunday, and the rabbis re­spected while the priests were put to work on the roads! All "powerfully contributed" to by murder, rapine, theft and starvation.

     Our author is more candid than he realizes. He calls this linked idealism and discontent "the historic qualities of the Jew­ish mind". The Dearborn Independent is indebted to him for this clear confirmation of what it has been saying for some time.

     But even that is not all. "These same historic qualities of the Jewish mind" which "contributed so powerfully to accomplish in Russia" the Red Terror still existing there, are declared by this author to be tending to promote the same sort of thing in other countries. He says so in so many words--"tending to promote in other countries".

     But we knew that. The only difference is that when Gentiles said it, they were overwhelmed with the wildest abuse; but now a pro-Jewish writer says it in a leading Jewish publication. And he says it apologetically--listen to him:

     "It was natural that...discontent in other parts of the world should find expression in overemphasis of issues and overstate­ment of aims".

     What discontent? Jewish discontent, of course. Discontent with what? With any form of Gentile rule. And how did it find expression? "In overemphasis of issues and overstatement of aims". What were these issues and aims? To bring the Bolshe­vik revolution to the United States.

     No, they did not overstate their aims; they exactly stated them--they simply selected the wrong country, that's all. [H: Sorry, but so far it is certainly THE very country!]

     There are Russian Bolshevists in this country now, hawking about the streets of New York the gold cigaret cases which they stole from Russian families, and the family jewels, the wedding and birthday rings, which they filched from Russian women. Bolshevism never got further than the pawnshop and burglar's "fence" idea. The proof of this traffic in stolen property is go­ing to drive some people into hiding before long. It will be a long, long time before America will be taking orders in Yiddish, or American women will be giving up their jewels to "the cho­sen race".

[H: Yes, it might have even taken another 78 years, but it has all but come to pass.]

     However, that happens to be only the most recent acknowl­edgement that has come to hand. It is significant for its confes­sion that "Jewish discontent" was "tending to promote" in "other countries" what it has "so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia".

     And with such a link between the American Hebrew, Russian Bolshevism and the Protocols, there are still Jewish publicists with the crust to say that only crazy people could see the connection. Only blind people will not see it. But that is only a minor connection. This series of articles does not rest on any­thing so accidental as the Jewish New Year's apology for Bol­shevism in the great Hebrew weekly of the United States.

Issue of September 25, 1920

END OF QUOTING

Well, now I really am in trouble. It seems there were two chapters left in the book and we had miscounted. We have a choice, however, of doing it now or doing it in the night and I think intelligence will prevail. I believe, however, that we need a new file reference.

Stop the long faces, readers. Rejoice at finding Truth for there is no longer fear in KNOWING; it is the ignorance that becomes problematic.

I am asked by those who think themselves to be Jewish: "What in the world do we call ourselves"? HUmans and Americans, or Italians or Greek or Russian or whatever you choose. If you are not THIS KIND OF JEW--then for goodness sakes call yourself a Gentile. What's the big deal? A name doesn't do a thing. Sticks and stones may break your bones but names will never hurt you--unless YOU LET THEM. Readers, FACTS ARE FACTS AND ALL THE WISHING IN THE WORLD WILL NOT CHANGE A BREATH OF IT.

The facts are that the world has been handed a "bill of goods"--you have been "had". So what? Are you going to just wallow and cower in the holes allowed to you? Get up off your assets and stop the nonsense.

Thank you, Salu.

http://www.fourwinds10.net/journals/pdf/J230.pdf