Nov. 25, 2015

PJ-229

CHAPTER 10

REC #1    HATONN

WED., FEB. 25, 1998     9:05 A.M.     YR. 11, DAY 193

WED., FEB. 25, 1998

 

GLOBAL RECOGNITION

 

I plan to move right along with the GLOBAL PARASITES jour­nals. The entire world is seeing the International Jew at work in an effort to gain total control of the United Nations and all its activities. Other nations see no way out of working with the U.S. and Great Britain, but I tell you that THERE IS A WAY! THE U.S. ALREADY REPRESENTS THE TOTAL FOOL AND FOOLHARDY IDIOTS OF THE GLOBE.

While the world rejoices over a respite from bloodletting, note who does NOT--the U.S., Great Britain and ISRAEL.

But now they have done it to themselves, this triad of terror, in that the Head of the Nations has gone and witnessed that these maverick Zionist "Kings" have lied, cheated, and planted evi­dence. WHEN TRUTH BEGINS TO FLOW, READERS, CHANGE IS IN THE WIND. WHEN PROOF IS VISITED UPON THE OBSERVERS AND OPEN TO WORLD OPIN­ION AND MEDIA, CHANGE IS GOING TO HAPPEN.

One of the things I note being touted to make Iraq look like a nation of evil monsters is the execution of TRAITORS. You act as if that is something out of the book of the Virgin Mary as to "awful", "terrible", and other offenses too bad to mention. People, you have a DEATH PENALTY FOR TREASON AND TRAITORS--AND I CAN TELL YOU RIGHT NOW--THERE ARE THOUSANDS WHO FIT THE CATEGORY RIGHT IN WASHINGTON D.C., NOT TO MENTION OTHER PLACES. Why don't you get facts AND THEN consider some judgment--you look like total fools trying this on MSNBC and CNN BEFORE THE FACTS ARE EVEN PUBLIC. YOU HAVE COME A LONG WAY, BABIES, AND IN THE WRONG DIRECTION.

[QUOTING:]PART 11, GLOBAL PARASITES]

THE HISTORIC BASIS OF

JEWISH IMPERIALISM

"We are a people--One people... When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of a revolutionary party; when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse."Theodor Herzl, A Jewish State, pp. 5, 23

A great unloosing of speech with reference to the Jewish Question and the Jewish program for world power has occurred in this country since the beginning of this series of articles. It is now possible to pronounce the word "Jew" in a perfectly serious discussion, without timidity, or without intimidation. Hereto­fore that has been regarded as the special prerogative of the Jewish publicists themselves and they have used the name exclu­sively in well-organized and favorable propaganda. They can oust portions of Shakespeare from the public schools on the ground that the Jews are offended; they can demand the removal of one of Sargent's paintings from the Boston Library because it represents the Synagogue in the decline. But when anything emanates from the Gentile side which indicates that the Gentile is also conscious of the Jew, then the charge of prejudice is in­stantly and strongly made. The effect of that in this country has been a ban on speech which has had few parallels in our history. Recently at a banquet a speaker used the term "Jews" in refer­ence to the actions of a group of Jewish bankers. A Jewish guest leaped to his feet demanding to know if the speaker con­sidered it "American" to single out a race that way. The speaker replied, "I do, sir," and received the approval of the audience. In that particular part of the country, business men's tongues had been tied for years by the unwritten law that Jews must never be singled out as Jews.

No one would have predicted a year ago that a newspaper like the Chicago Tribune could have convinced itself that it was good newspaper policy to print in the first column of its first page a copyrighted article on the Jewish program for world rule, printing the word "Jew" in large letters in its headline, and ab­staining from editorial retouching of the word "Jew" in the body of the article. The usual plan is to do what an eastern newspa­per did when dealing with the same subject: whenever the term "International Jew" occurred in the article which it printed, it was retouched to "financiers".

[H: Yes indeed, we had to move to the same tactics because, as I would dictate every third time the term Jew or Jewish was used, the entire program in the computer would be wiped away. Then the adversary monitors would change that to every, say, tenth time it was used the program would be wiped out in its entirety, even from the central data base. We often lost 35 to 45 pages of work. Then it began to hap­pen with "Zionist" and then we moved to Khazarian, and we finally had to substitute in New World Order. This means that the surveillance crews had to start reading for CON­TENT. Now we note that mostly we are left alone as we are only mostly duplicating that which has already been fought over.

The next attacks were to totally disallow enough funds to print the paper. Then, an effort to discredit--but that only got more readers, so now it is hopelessly (for them) scattered around to too many recipients (hardly any of which are sub­scribers) and we have fallen INTO PROTECTION instead of outright assault. This does not mean that danger to my scribe is OVER, for there are always the ones who would de­stroy for any personal reason whatsoever--but in this at­tacking we find our own inner infiltrators.]

The Chicago Tribune, however, on Saturday, June 19, 1920, printed in the first column of the first page a cable dispatch from John Clayton, its special correspondent, under the heading: "Trotsky Leads Jew-Radicals to World Rule. Bolshevism Only a Tool for His Scheme." [H: Go back and READ THAT AGAIN!]

The first paragraph reads as follows:

"For the last two years army intelligence officers, members of the various secret service organizations of the Entente, have been bringing in reports of a world revolu­tionary movement other than Bolshevism. At first these reports confused the two, but latterly the lines they have taken have begun to be more and more clear."

As previously stated in the Dearborn Independent, our own secret service is one of these, though there is reason to believe that because of the influence of Jews upon the government these investigations were not pursued with the persistency that might otherwise have been given them. However, we know from Jewish sources, not to mention any other, that the Department of Justice of the United States was at one time interested enough to make inquiries.

What the Tribune writer does in the above paragraph is to show that this interest has been sustained for two years by offi­cials of the Entente, a fact which ought to be borne in mind by those who declare that the whole matter is of German instiga­tion. The emergence of the Jewish Question into American thought was immediately met by the statement from Jewish sources that it was a German importation, and that the anti-Semitism which flowed over Germany and resulted in cleaning out the overwhelming Jewish revolutionary influences from the new German government, was only a trick to throw the blame for the defeat of Germany on the Jews. American rabbis are even now unitedly preaching that history shows that every great war is followed by a new "attack" on the Jews. It is undoubt­edly a fact that every war newly opens the people's eyes to the power which international Jewish financiers exert with reference to war--and it would seem that such a fact is worthy of a better explanation than that of "prejudice". However, as the Tribune article shows, and as all the facts confirm, the interest is not confined to the German side; indeed, it is not even strongest there. It is "the various secret service organizations of the En­tente" that have been most active in the matter.

The second paragraph further distinguishes between Bolshe­vism and Jewish imperialism:

"Bolshevism aims for the overthrow of existing society and the establishment of an international brotherhood of men who work with their hands as rulers of the world. The second movement aims for the establishment of a new racial domination of the world. So far as the British, French and our own department's inquiry have been able to trace, the moving spirits in the second scheme are Jew­ish radicals."

Other statements in the article:

"With the ranks of Communism is a group of this party, but it does not stop there. To its leaders, Commu­nism is only an incident."

(This will recall the statement of Lord Eustace Percy, quoted last week from the Canadian Jewish Chronicle--"Not be­cause the Jew cares for the positive side of radical philosophy, not because he desires to be a partaker in Gentile nationalism or Gentile democracy, but because no existing Gentile system of government is anything but distasteful to him.")

"They are ready to use the Islamic revolt, hatred by the central empires for England, Japan's designs on India, and commercial rivalry between America and Japan."

"As any movement of world revolution must be, this is primarily anti-Anglo-Saxon."

"The organization of the world Jewish-radical movement has been perfected in almost every land."

"The aims of the Jewish-radical party have nothing of altruism behind them beyond liberation of their own race."

It will be conceded that these are rather startling statements. If they were found in a propagandist publication of no responsi­bility, the average reader might pass them by as preposterous, so little does the average reader know of the secret influences which shape his life and frame his problems. But appearing in a great newspaper, they must receive a different evaluation.

Nor did the Tribune stop at the news article. On June 21, 1920, an editorial appeared entitled "World Mischief". The ed­itorial is evidently an effort to prevent possible misunderstanding of what the news article was driving at.

"The Jewish phase of the movement, he asserts, aims at a new racial domination of the world..."

The Tribune says that while it is perhaps natural for the Jews of other countries to be engaged in this "World Mischief", the Jews of England and the United States "are loyal nationalists and conservative upholders of the national traditions." It were(ok) well if this were true. Perhaps it is true of tens of thousands of Jews as individuals; it certainly is not true of those internation­alists who pull the strings of all the governments and who during the last six tragic years have been meddling with world affairs in a way which must soon be plainly told. The unfortunate cir­cumstance is that all the American and English Jews must for a time feel a distress which no one desires them to feel, which ev­eryone would do much to save them from, but which seems in­evitable until the whole story is told and until the mass of the Jews themselves cut off from their name and support some who now receive their deepest homage.

It is worth while observing the contrasts and similarities be­tween the Gentile and Jewish reaction to this alleged movement to establish a Jewish imperialism over the world. Jewish publi­cists first deny it without qualification. It is all false, all a lie, all hatched up by enemies of the Jews in order to stir up hatred and murder. As the evidence accumulates, the Jewish tone changes: "Well, suppose it is true," the publicists say; "is it any wonder that the poor oppressed Jews, driven to madness through their sufferings, should dream dreams of overthrowing their en­emies and placing themselves in the seat of authority?"

The Gentile mind, confronted with the statement, says: "Yes, but they are Russian Jews. Don't mind them. American Jews are all right. They would never be taken in by anything like that." Going a little deeper into the subject, the Gentile mind is forced to admit the existence of some kind of a subversive world movement, the power of which has shaken even this country, and that the moving spirits in it are revolutionary Jews. And then the tendency from that point forward is either to fall in with the theory and the movement is really Jewish in its origin, agita­tion, execution and purpose, or to set up the theory that it is a "world movement" undoubtedly, but only incidentally Jewish. The end of both Jewish and Gentile reaction is an admission that something answering to the movement charged actually exists.

For example, the Christian Science Monitor, whose standard as a newspaper no one will question, has this to say in a lengthy editorial on the subject:

"In spite of this, it would be a tremendous mistake to conclude that the Jewish peril, given another name and atmosphere, does not exist. It might, indeed, be renamed, out of one of the grandest of the books of the Old Testa­ment, 'the terror by night', for it is, essentially, the Psalmist's concept of the forces of mental evil at which, consciously or unconsciously, Professor Nilus is aiming. In other words, that a secret international political organi­zation exists, working unremittingly by means of its Bu­reau of Psychology, though the world which should be awake to it is entirely asleep to it, is, to the man who can read the signs of the times, a thing unquestionable."

The Monitor gives warning against prejudice and disregard of the laws of evidence which is exceedingly timely and is, indeed, the desire of anyone who has ever undertaken to deal with this subject, but too often it is a disregard of facts and not of evi­dence that makes the difficulty. It is safe to say that most of the prejudice today is against the facts, it has not been caused by them.

There are two preconceptions to be guarded against in mak­ing an approach to this question. One is that the Jewish imperi­alistic program, if such a thing exists, is of recent origin. Upon the mere mention of such a program, Gentiles are likely to think that it was formulated last week, or last year, or within recent time. That need not be the case at all, and in Jewish matters it is very likely not to be the case. It is very easy to see how, if the program were to be formulated today, it would be wholly different from the one which is to be considered. The kind of program that would be made today indeed exists too, but it is not to be compared in extent and profundity with that which has existed for a very long time. Perfect constitutions of invisible government are not the creations of secret conventions; they are the accumulated thought and experience of centuries. More­over, no matter how prone a modern generation may be to dis­regard such things, the mere fact that they may have existed as a secret racial ideal for centuries is a powerful argument for their respectable acceptance, if not active execution, by the genera­tion that now is. There is no idea deeper in Judaism than that Jews constitute a Chosen People and that their future is to be more glorious than their past. A large part of the Christian world accepts that, too, and it may well be true, but in a moral universe it cannot come to pass by the methods which have been and are being used.

[H: The facts are and the problem IS: These latter JEWS are the very chosen people of their god, Jehovah. They have many names right in the BIBLES for this entity, but here is where the facts split from the tales. Jehovah is LUCIFER and is the god of the dark side, the PHYSICAL expression of life-form representing as humanoid and the adversary of HUman. I didn't make this up to annoy you readers; these are the FACTS, undeniable and indisputable--and actually, you will find that they are NOT REALLY DISPUTED. "Jesus" is in dispute always because people wish to put their "faith" in a MAN-person but as for the Christed TEACHER, HIS name was not "Jesus" as you write, pro­nounce and accept unquestioned from your false teachers.]

But to mention the ancient lineage of the idea of the Chosen People is merely to suggest that of all the programs that may have gathered round it to assist its full historical realization, it is not strange that there should be one very old one to which the wisest minds of Israel have contributed their best of mind and heart to insure its success. That there is such a plan has been the belief of many deep delvers in the hidden things of the world, and that such a plan has at times had its dress rehearsals, so to speak, on a limited stage, as if in preparation for its grand finale on the universal stage, is another belief held by men at whose knowledge it is impossible to cavil.

So, then, it may be that we are dealing with something for which present-day Jews, even the more important international­ists, are not originally responsible. It may have come to them as part of their ancient Jewish inheritance. Certainly, if it were a mere modern thing, hastily conceived and thrown together after the modern fashion, it could be expected to disappear in the same era which saw it born.

Another preconception to be guarded against is that every Jew one meets has secret knowledge of this program. That is not the case. With the general idea of the ultimate triumph of Israel every Jew who has retained contact with his people is fa­miliar, but with the special plans which for centuries have ex­isted in formulated form for the attainment of that triumph, the average Jew is no more familiar than anyone else--no more so than was the average German with the secret plans of the Pan-Germanic party whose ideas started and guided the recent war. The average Jew enters into the plans of the secret group just to this extent, except in specially selected cases: It is perfectly un­derstood that the consummation of the Jewish triumph will not be distasteful to any Jew, and if the methods to be used toward the end are a bit violent, every Jew can be depended upon to see in that violence a very insufficient retribution visited upon the Gentile world for the sufferings which it has caused the sons of Judah throughout the centuries.

Still, with even these preconceptions guarded against, there is no escape from the conclusion that if such a program of Jewish world imperialism exists today, it must exist with the cognizance and active support of certain individuals, and that these groups of individuals must have somewhere an official head.

This is, perhaps, the one point at which more investigators stop than at any other. The idea of a Jewish autocrat is too strange for the mind which has not been much in contact with the main question. And yet there is no race which more instinc­tively supports autocracy than does the Jewish race, no race which more craves and respects position. It is their sense of the value of position which explains the main course their activities take. The Jew is primarily a money-maker for the reason that up to this time money is the only means he knows by which to gain position. The Jews who have gained position for any other reason are comparatively few. [H: But THAT was 1920 and, NOW, you can see they have full control of the governments of several of your more powerful nations, including the United States and, through Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, etc.] This is not a Gentile gibe; it is the position of a famous Anglo-Jewish physician, Dr. Barnard Von Oven, who wrote: "all other means of distinction are denied him; he must rise by wealth, or not at all. And if, as he well knows, to insure wealth will be to insure rank, respect and at­tention in society, does the blame rest with him who endeavors to acquire wealth for the distinction which it will purchase, or with that society which so readily bows down to the shrine of Mammon?"

The Jew is not averse to kings, only to the state of things which prevents a Jewish king. The future autocrat of the world IS TO BE A JEWISH KING, sitting upon the throne of David, so ancient prophecies and the documents of the imperialist pro­gram agree.

Is such a king in the world now? [H: Well, there IS "now".] If not, the men who could choose a king are in the world. There has been no king of the Jews since before the Christian Era, but until about the eleventh century there were Princes of the Exile, those who represented the headship of the Jews who were dispersed through the nations. They were and still are called "exilarchs", or Princes of the Exile. They were attended by the wise men of Israel; they held court; they gave the law to their people. They lived abroad wherever their cir­cumstances or convenience dictated, in Christian or Mo­hammedan countries. Whether the office was discontinued with the last publicly known exilarch or merely disappeared from the surface of history, whether today it is entirely abandoned or ex­ists in another form, are questions which must wait. That there are offices of world jurisdiction held by Jews is well known. That there are world organizations of Jews--organizations, that is, within the very strong solidarity of the Jewish nation itself--is well known. That there is world unity on certain Jewish activi­ties, defensive and offensive, is well known. There is nothing in the condition or thought of the Jews which would render the existence today of an exilarch distasteful, to them; indeed, the thought would be very comfortable.

[H: You should, and so should Kofi Annan, realize that he is the LAST PLANNED NON-JEW TO HEAD THE CUR­RENT UNITED NATIONS. It was thought that he could and would be CONTROLLED. That trip to Iraq has just about blown the entire scheme of the Jewish leadership of the nations already captured in the trap. Note the play DOWN of Kofi's work while the world is on its feet and knees applauding--for truth can be brought out by THAT ONE HUMBLE MAN. PLEASE, YOU MUST ACT NOW WHILE THE WINDOW AND DOOR STAND OPEN--YOU WILL NOT LIKELY EVER HAVE ANOTHER CHANCE FOR FREEDOM ON YOUR GLOBE.]

The Jewish Encyclopedia remarks: "Curiously enough, the exilarchs are still mentioned in the Sabbath services of the Ashkenazim ritual... The Jews of the Sephardic ritual have not preserved this anachronism, nor was it retained in most of the Reform synagogues of the nineteenth century."

[H: Please pay attention to this for if you study THIS care­fully and relate it to Nora's research as well as Cal Burgin's material, Eustace Mullins and even Jewish writings of the last decade, you begin to see the breakdown in the various "sects" or groupings of the Jews themselves BY THEM­SELVES.]

Is there, then, a Jewish Sanhedrin?--a governing or counseling body of Jews who take oversight of the affairs of their people throughout the world? [H: You bet, and they do it through the Protocols AND THE TALMUD.]

The Jewish Sanhedrin was a most interesting institution. Its origin and method of constitution are obscure. It consisted of 71 members, with the president, and performed the functions of a political senate. There is nothing to show whence the Sanhedrin derived its authority. It was not an elective body. It was not democratic. It was not representative. It was not responsible to the people. In these qualities, it was typically Jewish. The San­hedrin was chosen by the prince or priest, not with the purpose of safeguarding the people's interest, but to assist the ruler in the work of administration. [H: Come on, people, this authority came directly down from Lucifer, Jehovah, SATAN.] It was thus assembled by call, or it was self-perpetuating, calling its own members. The arrangement seems to have been that well-known device by which an aristocracy can maintain itself in power whatever the political construction of the nation may be. The Jewish Encyclopedia says: "The Sanhedrin, which was en­tirely aristocratic in character, probably assumed its own au­thority, since it was composed of members of the most influen­tial families of the nobility and priesthood."

This body was flanked by a similar body, which governed the religious interests of the nation, the members being drawn ap­parently from classes nearer the common people.

The Sanhedrin exercised authority not only over the Jews of Palestine, but wherever they were scattered throughout the world. As a senate exercising direct political authority, it ceased with the downfall of the Jewish State in the year 70, but there are indications of its continuance as an advisory body down to the fourth century.

In 1806, in order to satisfy the mind of Napoleon upon some questions which had arisen concerning the Jews, an Assembly of Notables was called, whose membership consisted of prominent Jews of France. They, in turn, to bring the sanction of all Jewry to the answers which they should give Napoleon, con­voked the Sanhedrin. The Sanhedrin assembled in Paris on February 9, 1807. It followed the prescribed ancient forms; it was comprised of Jews from all parts of Europe; it was assem­bled to put the whole authority of Jewry behind any compact the French Jews may have been able to make with Napoleon.

In putting forth its decisions, this Sanhedrin of 1807 declared that it was in all respects like the ancient Sanhedrin, "a legal as­sembly vested with power of passing ordinances in order to promote the welfare of Israel".

The significance of these facts is this: Whatever the leaders of the Jews may do today in the way of maintaining the policy and constitution of Israel, would not constitute a new departure. It would not signify a new attitude. It would not be evidence of a new plan.

It would be entirely natural, Jewish solidarity being what it is, that the Sanhedrin should still be continued. The ancient Sanhedrin appears to have had a group of ten who were some­what exalted in importance above the rest; it would be perfectly natural if the leaders of the Jews were today divided into com­mittees, by countries or by objects. [H: Puts a different light on the prophecies and "ten heads", doesn't it?]

There are always being held, year by year, world meetings of the principal Jews of all lands. They come together whenever called, to the disregard of everything else. Great judges from the high courts of the various countries, international financiers, Jewish orators of the "liberal type" who have the ear of the Gentiles, political maneuverers from all the parties represented in the world, they assemble wherever they will, and the subjects of their deliberations are made known ONLY to the extent they will. It is not to be supposed that all of the attendants on these conventions are members of the inner circle. [H: Try the Council on Foreign Relations for ONE group and work your way UP FROM THERE.] The list of delegates will show scores of persons with whom no one would associate Lord Reading and Judge Brandeis. If the modern Sanhedrin meets, and it would be the most natural thing in the world if it should, we may be sure it meets within the CLOSE CIRCLE of those persons which the Jewish aristocracy of money, intellect and power approves. [H: Bilderbergers? Club of Rome?]

The machinery of a Jewish world government exists ready-made. The Jew is convinced that he has the best religion, the best morality, the best method of education, the best social stan­dards, the best ideal of government. He would not have to go outside the circle of that which he considers best to get anything which he may need to advance the welfare of his people, or to execute any program which may have to do with the outside world.

It is the ancient machinery that the international Jew uses in all those activities which he permits the world to see in part. There are gatherings of the financial, political and intellectual chief rulers of the Jews. These gatherings are announced for one or another thing--sometimes. Sometimes there is a gather­ing of Jews in a world capital, with no announced purpose. They all appear in one city, confer and depart. [H: Hum­mmnnn Hummnn.]

Whether or not there is a recognized head to all of this is yet to be disclosed [1920]. There can be little doubt, however, as to the existence of what may be called a "foreign policy", that is, a definite point of view and plan of action with reference to the Gentile world. The Jew feels that he is in the midst of enemies, but he also feels that he is a member of a people--"one people". He must have some policy with regard to the outer world. He cannot help but consider present conditions, he cannot consider them without being stirred to speculate upon what the outcome must be, and he cannot speculate on the outcome without in some manner endeavoring to make it as he would like it to be.

The invisible government of the Jews, its attitude toward the Gentile world, its policy with regard to the future, are not, then, the abnormal things that some would make them appear. Given the Jewish position, they are of all things most natural. Jewish existence in the world is not such as woos the Jew into sleepy contentment; it is such as stirs him into organization against fu­ture contingencies and into programs which may shape those contingencies to the benefit of his race. That there should be a Sanhedrin of the Jews, a world body of the leading men of all countries; that there should even be an exilarch, a visible and recognized head of the Sanhedrin, mystically foreshadowing the autocrat to come; that there should even be a world program, just as every government has its foreign policy, are not strange, uncanny suppositions. They grow normally out of the situation itself.

And it is also natural that not every Jew should know this. The Sanhedrin always WAS THE ARISTOCRACY, and would be today. When rabbis cry from their pulpits that they know nothing about this thing, they are doubtless telling the truth. What the international Jew depends upon is the likelihood of ev­ery Jew approving that which brings power and prestige to his people. At any rate, it is well enough known that however little the ordinary Jewish leader may have been told about world pro­grams, he regards with the greatest respect and confidence the very men who must put these programs through, if these exist at all.

The twenty-fourth Protocol of the Learned Elders of Zion has this to say:

"Now I will discuss the manner in which the roots of the house of King David will penetrate to the deepest strata of the Earth. This dynasty, even to this day, has given the power of controlling world affairs to our wise men, the educational di­rectors of all human thought."

[H: But what does THIS have to do with happenings in Iraq TODAY? Well, these men set down some sequence criteria which ares presented, BUT MISSED, by the observing world. Into the necessary acquisitions to bring under this KING OF THE JEWS IS ALL OF IRAQ. Not only THAT, but every inch of land that is represented in the Israeli FLAG. The two blue lines with the Star of (so-called) House of David in the middle REPRESENT THE EUPHRATES RIVER AND THE TIGRIS RIVER. THERE COMES A LINE OF ACQUISITIONS, HOWEVER, THAT ARE VERY IMPORTANT, AND THAT IS THE MAJOR BIB­LICAL CLAIM AND THAT IS HELD BY SADDAM HUS­SEIN.]

This would indicate, if reliable, that, as the Protocol goes on to recite, the Autocrat himself has not appeared, but the dy­nasty, or the Davidic line in which he must appear, have en­trusted the work of preparing for him to the Wise Men of Zion. These wise men are represented not only as preparing those who exercise rulership over Judaism's affairs, but also as framing and influencing the world's thought toward ends which shall be propitious to these plans. Whatever may be hidden in the pro­gram, it is certain that its execution or the effects of its execu­tion cannot be hidden. Therefore, it may be possible to find in the outer world the clues which, traced back to their source, re­veal the existence of a program, whose promise for the world, good or bad, ought to be widely known.

[END OF QUOTING]

So, let's look at this and that which I last wrote about sequence. For things to be "fulfilled" upon your heads from the prophecies of those who wrote your play, the lands between the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers MUST BE IN THE CONTROL OF THE JEWISH HENCHMEN. It has to be or the prophecies and pro­gram get such a GLITCH that even the involved and inner-Jew­ish hierarchy would lose face if the program fails. The power play is over oil on the FACE OF IT but the REAL CAUSE is to acquire through force and power that particular land upon which sits, in deference to all you hear and are shown, a goodly, even GODLY man, and all the lies will not make it otherwise.

Indeed, world, YOUR WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY IS "RIGHT NOW". Adonai.

http://www.fourwinds10.net/journals/pdf/J229.pdf