Oct. 12, 2015

PJ 228

CHAPTER 2

REC #3   HATONN

SAT., FEB. 7, 1998    12:55 P.M.    YR. 11, DAY 175

SAT.,  FEB. 7, 1998

RISE OF ANTICHRIST

PART NINE

QUOTING, ANTICHRIST, Coughlin (Circa 1970):

ESSAY NINE

THE GREAT BETRAYAL

(A)

     Probably thirty-two to thirty-six percent of the Catholic pop­ulation has been scandalized to such an extent that faith in epis­copal leadership (or lack of leadership) has been seriously warped. This information is so common that specifications to support the observation are unnecessary.

     As a matter of record the Church Militant has lost more ad­herents in the past fifty years than it did in the previous five hundred years. Its once highly valued and prosperous mission­ary activities are moribund; and its commission "to preach the gospel to every creature" has become a haunting memory. History will record that Martin Luther's revolution was a tran­sient cloudburst compared to the present flood: for Karl Marx has removed more members from the Catholic Church Militant than did any previous religious convulsion. He and his associ­ates, having seized the momentum generated by the Augustinian friar, sparked the Earth into a motion which produced the con­flagration of three world wars over which pontificated Protes­tant, Catholic and ex-christian leaders; and, finally, dominated the peace conferences and summit meetings which, most certainly, will ignite the final explosion.

[H: Dharma keeps trying to account for the "Third World War" as we go along here. So too are lots of you others. Well, consider that you ARE IN IT AS WE WRITE! THE THIRD, THE BIG, AND PROBABLY THE LAST.]

     Those who are abreast of the extraordinary movements in the world of politics and religion are aware of the uncontrollable currents in which both the captains of State and church are hopelessly involved. Day by day problems appear to increase both in momentum and magnitude despite man's best efforts to contain them. In our lifetime the League of Nations, conceived in a cavernous womb of "get-along-without-God", did not sur­vive the lecherous Peace Treaty of Versailles. Following World War II the United Nations, constitutionally atheistic, surfaced as a second attempt to unite the human race into a one-world cor­pus with aspirations of its developing into a one-world govern­ment.

     In the religious world a similar cycle of evolution is very evi­dent. First: Since the surrender of Constantinople in 1453 christian leaders recognized the futility of fashioning a one-reli­gious world. The impasse compelled both christians and Mohammedans to acknowledge by secret conference and open treaty the permanency of Mohammedanism which, in its final analysis, was an outgrowth of Arianism as arianism, in turn, de­veloped from fractured christianity.

     Second: Since World War II both Protestants and Catholics have become desperately interested in forming a single ecu­menical organization wherein they can strengthen their sagging moral and numerical influence. (Mohammedans 750-million; Christians 620-million; other non-christians 1-1/2 BILLION.) [H: But note that those of Mohammed alone so outnumber you "christians" as to be quite frightening if "they" weren't far more GODLY IN CONCEPT, INTENT, AND BELIEF THAN ARE YOU RECENTLY CONVERTED ANTICHRISTIANS. For Gosh sakes, Jesusians, the Evangelis­tic Pentecostals are going to RAPTURE YOU TO THE NEAREST SPACE EXTERMINATOR'S CHAMBERS.]

     Third: there is the alarming tax situation compelling both the minority Protestants and Catholics into an integration.

     This proposed American amalgamation of Catholic and Protestant is more or less a veiled secret. It is planned to estab­lish a worldwide organization which is counter to the one Christ and the Holy Spirit established when they organized the original "one faith" structure.

     Few acquainted with the present novelty understand the in­temperate haste of a score of American prelates who, in panic, seemingly choose to abandon the Bark of Peter. The bigger, better, modernized, nuclear flagship of the National Council of Churches has lured them, despite its many direct and indirect affiliations with Communism. They have forgotten how to ex­claim, "Master save us, lest we perish". So, for the nonce, there is arm-in-arm-ism with non papal christian sects as the leaders of American Catholicism aspire to join a jello entity for a materialistic objective.

     Indeed, each member of this organization will be forced to accept the nonsensical conclusion that a score of rotting apples can produce one healthy Macintosh (apple, that is).

     Wheels are spinning erratically in many episcopal offices. The fait accompli has not yet been achieved. However, both Catholic and Protestants are on their way to become a new kind of "One" without any clear understanding of who they are, where they are going or under what flag they are fighting Christ's battle.

     The "Joint Study Committee on Possible Roman Catholic Membership in the National Council of Churches" was set up two years ago by the bishops of America (1970). It has printed a record of its two years work in a forty-seven-page report. Its findings were finally written by the fuzzy theologian, Father Avery Dulles, S.J., son of John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State during the Eisenhower Administration. The Secretary was a top official in the National Council of Churches which oper­ated under the discredited title of the Federal Council of Churches.

     At present a Catholic commission, appointed by the Bishops of the United States, is preparing to betroth publicly the "One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church" (as Catholics formerly believed)--to the presently unnamed master of the harem who will preside over the National Council of Churches which is more apt to prefer Moscow to Vatican City.

     Let it be a matter of documented history to record the names of the seven Catholics officially selected to serve on this pre­nuptial committee: Catholic co-Chairman, Bishop Charles H. Helmsing of the Kansas City-St. Joseph Diocese; Bishop Joseph L. Bernardin, Secretary of the National Council of Catholic Bishops; Father Avery Dulles, S.J., professor at Bellarmine School, Chicago, III.; Father Fredrick McManus, Executive Secretary of the Bishops Committee on liturgy; and Father Ed­ward Neil, Assistant Secretary of the NCCB.

     This constitutes the skeleton crew. The unnamed personages behind the curtains are vastly more important both in power and prestige.

     Insofar as each unit of the NCC has proven to be a failure in its own sphere, how can a proper Catholic rest at ease inside the jurisdiction of such a worldwide religious monstrosity?

     Catholic churchmen, evidently, have been "keeping com­pany" with this hidden harem-master for some time. As early as 1966 the General Board of the Council officially recognized the Catholic Church as being in general accord with its principles. Already five Catholics are members of the Council Staff. Since 1970 Catholics served on the council's theological group, known as "The Commission on Faith". The most shocking information of all is this: Pope Paul VI recently contributed $10,000.00 to the NCC Commission on "Faith and Order", which gift was accompanied by the Papal words, "(May) this gesture dispel any cloud that may be hanging over our relations with the World Council of Churches and help to further collaboration even in those forms prevailing until now".

     An interesting side-notation is found in the fact that, while many Catholic dioceses already are members of NCC Councils, (almost 100 at this writing) many Protestant churches have ter­minated their association with the NCC because of "its inordi­nate, immoral and un-American support of left wing activities".

     To say that many clerical and lay Catholics are disturbed on reading this is a flagrant understatement. Even mature persons who do not read available literature on ecclesiastical trends for­tunately are simplistic and mercifully uninformed of what is transpiring inside the Church. Unfortunately many priests are not "in-personages" on the motives, plots, plans and purposes of their hierarchy. "Why", one asks, "has there been a sudden re­versal of policy? What has happened to the firm condemnation by the Popes from Leo XIII to Pius XI of this type of ecu­menism"?

     Having recorded the preceding alarming happenings, I am in­sistent on seeking an answer. To preface my solution, the an­swer does not lie in the assertion that the Holy Father has grown fearful of his own position; nor that he has changed either his faith or philosophy; nor that those like myself, who have been notorious for our opposition to Communism or Marxism for more than fifty years are about to surrender; nor is it logical merely to surmise. An official answer is demanded to destroy the suspicions such gestures create.

     Transferring my thought, momentarily, from this hideous manifestation of disloyalty to the ironclad doctrines of Jesus Christ in which there is no elasticity or compromise on many points, may I cite four historic facts of interest, mostly associ­ated with His Holiness, Paul VI. These may be classified as "dirty linen" which require exposure to the sunlight of explana­tion to firm our support of His Holiness.

     Fact one: It is notorious that the Catholic hierarchy has ceased fighting Communism. This is reflected in the pro­nouncements in the Catholic press, in pulpits and classrooms by priests and nuns and by Catholic politicians.

     Fact two: shortly after Communist Yugoslavia resumed diplomatic relations with the Vatican (1970) Tito was invited to visit Paul VI. The public press reported that "solemn honors" were accorded him; and the "red flag of Communism flew over the buildings of the Holy See". Magnificent honor to the man whose government murdered thousands of Catholics. [H: And other nice people, too.]

     Fact three: The ILO (International Labor Organization) con­vened a worldwide meeting at Geneva, June 1970. One trust­worthy American, George Meany, is my authority for stating that this organization "is an instrument of the Communists". Nevertheless, Pope Paul VI appeared before the assembled hier­archy of the ILO in June, 1971, and described this "instrument of Communism" as a "deserving and representative, interna­tional organism, so very congenial with our own mission of jus­tice, of peace and of brotherhood". At the same time, our lib­eral United States Senate refused to sanction an annual donation from the American government to the ILO because of "its top-level Communist control".

     Fact four: The U.S. News and World Report for July 5, 1971, observed that "Pope Paul VI has espoused Red China's admission to the United Nations, and has made a number of conciliatory references to the Peking regime". "...The Review of the News for November 17, 1971, recorded further Vatican dealings with Red China, relating that, in return for Peking's "word" (words written on air) life would be better for the

4-mil­lion Catholics enslaved in Communist China...".

     This essay does not pretend to be encyclopedic; nor could several volumes condense the multitude of once startling facts which have become so commonplace they no longer rate public­ity; for since 1970, "off-beat" Catholicism has become the fifth mark of the Church which once boasted of its being "One, Holy, Catholic and apostolic". Flirtation with Communistic principles has become the "in-thing" as are disobedience to the Holy Father (GOD) and disloyalty to our beleaguered country, long since the target of Marxist mobsters and purchased propa­gandists.

     Now, may I attempt to rationalize the "Why" of some of these confusing facts: If Pope Paul hoists the flag of Commu­nism when he receives in his own home and office a formal vis­itor from the Soviet government, can a true member of the Mystical Body of Christ applaud him? Yes! First because he, the Holy Father (Pope), has 60-million Catholic christians living in mortal peril behind the iron curtain. [H: Well there are more than that number into the millions living in mortal peril OUTSIDE the iron curtain--even back in 1971.]

     Most importantly: Paul is the Vicar of Christ. It was Christ who consorted with sinners because He came into the world to save neither the rich nor the poor but sinners. [H: No com­ment!] It was Christ who permitted a well known adulteress to wash His feet. It was Christ who, finally, from the pulpit of the cross, rationalized Paul's action when He said, "Father, forgive them for they know not what they do". [H: Do you REALLY think that's what was meant?]

     Stalin, Engles and their butchers [H: Khazarian Zionist One-Worlders, every one...] murdered 21-million christians, seized their churches, nationalized their children and perpetrated the worst persecution on world record.

     If the blood of martyrs was the seed of christians under Nero, what will one say about the 21-million martyred Russians? Paul knows the words. Who knows the future with certainty? [H: And just WHO was this "Paul"? Ummnn Hummnn.]

     He has official contact with the Holy Spirit. Only to him, for the present, has been spoken the words, "He who heareth you, heareth Me". Therefore, it is not the business of a chris­tian soldier to question Pope Paul's authority or disregard his divine information. [H: Why the H... heck, not?] Bluntly, how can one convert an enemy unless he makes contact with him? [H: Ah, but just who in these tales got, and gets, con­verted? If these are the "christians" of the world--SPARE ME FROM THEM.]

(B)

     Too many bishops are Satan's little helpers. Too many are second-hand Antichrists, at least in the lukewarm manner de­scribed by Christ. Bishops, we agree, should love Communists, but we challenge them for adopting Communistic policies and principles out of fear for survival since the Holy Spirit has al­ready armed them with invincible weapons.

     To rationalize the so-called "dirty linen" of criticism aimed at Pope Paul's approaches to the Communists (not communism) is not difficult for those who understand the master's attitude to­wards sinners and His persecutors. [H: How fuzzy can you get, people? I said you can work with your enemy without becoming the enemy. The Church became the very Com­munists they claimed to abhor.]

     The bishops' advances to Communism and non-Catholic philosophies, however, present a totally different problem. Can a sincere Catholic applaud the NCCB's subversive and subter­ranean effort to join the World Council of Churches or its affiliates? Their highly suspicious and suspected motive for so doing seems not to spread the faith but to "save the money".

     For more than fifty years the World Conference of Churches and particularly its American affiliate, the National Council of Churches, in which the Catholic Church is now interested, has been operating under a cloud of suspicion. Recall that those churches which enjoy tax-exemption are manned by well edu­cated gentlemen. Citizens in their category are aware that ap­proximately $300-billion of Foundation money (e.g. Ford, Rockefeller, etc., etc.) is also tax-exempt, is expended on char­itable institutions; a larger sum on questionable social activities which oftentimes are socialistic or anti-American; and the bal­ance invested at interest to swell the original fund.

     It is painfully obvious the educated churchmen never contest the policy of challenging these tax-exemptions which, if the foundations were taxed, would amount approximately with re­investments to $10-billion (Federal and State) per year. This money could feed the poor, cure the sick and care for the aged. [H: Hummnn, the very ones Jason Brent and Mensa would kill off.] It is money the middle class citizens must supply in taxes from their already exploited pay envelopes.

     Now the tragic question: Why the criminal silence on the part of both Protestant and Catholic clergymen? My answer is more than a suspicion. It is this: Because the churchmen fear the powerful corporations which control the tax-exempt foundations will lobby legislation through Congress to tax the churches.

     This conclusion is not a mathematical certainly. However, I am conscious of the mortal fear the churchmen have of being taxed. I am doubly conscious they seldom refer to Christ's courage in attacking the "exempt" Pharisees. Words of the Master keep ringing amidst the din of the "not guilty" cries of some frightened writers. "Woe to you Pharisees who devour the houses of widows and orphans. Woe to you Pharisees who place imponderable burdens on the backs of the poor. Woe to you whited sepulchers filled with dead men's' bones". Phar­isees and foundations are one breed, both of whom exploit the poor Jews, poor Americans, the poor christians and pagans. [H: And is PROVEN to be "the Pharisees"? Thank you for remembering!]

     History is repeating itself. The ecclesiastical Pharisees pro­tect the financial foundations--tax-exempt brothers protecting each other. They shed tears over racism, but will not breathe even a sigh for the causes to which are traced the origins of poverty.

     How far these clergymen have departed from their apostolic predecessors is beyond assessment. It constitutes a new image for the bishops in a day when the Christ-image of the apostles is being totally abandoned.

     To firm my observations as to what has happened in America under the leadership of our present bishops, read an exceptional Roman release which appeared in the

New York Timesand De­troit Free Press (Saturday, May 13, 1972). It was publicized worldwide because its author and the journal in which it first appeared are above the ordinary. The article is reproduced here below:

"ROME--a Vatican weekly said this week that the Ro­man Catholic Church in the United States was being shaken by a "tremendous earthquake" and seemed on the verge of collapse, but it voiced the hope that it would be saved by its "silent majority".

The publication L'Osservatore Della Domenica said that almost daily "some new disaster" was befalling the Church in America--priests deserting their ministry, nuns abandoning their convent, theologians looking for secular jobs, parochial schools closing.

The weekly lamented that Roman Catholic writers and publications in the United States were criticizing their church "with a masochistic furor that has few precedents in the history not only of the Church but also of any soci­ety".

     THE AUTHOR OF THE article, the Rev. Father Bat­tista Mondin, wrote that during a recent visit to the United States several persons told him the Catholic Church would be "totally wiped out" within the next 20 years. [H: Well?? Now harken up, readers; if this was truly the CHURCH OF GOD OR OF THE LIVING CHRIST--do you think there would be ANYTHING THAT COULD WIPE IT OUT? WHEN YOU LIVE THE LIE--YOU NOTE THAT YOU DO NOT SURVIVE--PERIOD, AND QUITE SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND. THE TRUE BODY OF GOD WILL NOT BE WIPEDOUT, GOOD BUDDIES.]

     Father Mondin is an Italian priest who works in the central administrative body of the Roman Catholic Church.

     L'Osservatore Della Domenica has no official Church status, although its articles often reflect the thinking of influential churchmen. Its editor, Federico Alessandrini, a layman who is also the official Vatican press spokesman, said that Father Mondin was "well qualified".

     The Italian priest gave three reasons for disarray in the American Church--excessive discussion and criticisms in the wake of the Ecumenical Council Vatican II (1962-65), infiltra­tion of secularism into Roman Catholic thought in America and ethnic inferiority complexes.

     THE WRITER explained that the secular fallacy consisted in regarding anything connected with an after life as irrelevant and the conviction that the church was significant only in that it was able to help counter war, hunger, racial conflicts and other so­cial ills.

     Recalling that the Roman Catholic Church in the United States has been nurtured by immigrants from Ireland, Italy, Poland and other European countries, Father Mondin said that many in these groups striving to be accepted by "Yankees", were renouncing their old-world religious traditions.

     But, he said, there still is a strong "silent majority" among American Roman Catholics clinging to the Basic tenets of Christianity", and that this majority would guarantee the sur­vival of their Church.

[H: No, they won't guarantee anything save the ultimate downfall of that "church". It is steeped in WRONG AND FALSE CONCEPTS AND CAN NEVER SURVIVE IN A WORLD OF TRUTH OR, FURTHER, IN A WORLD OF "GETCHA" ALL AND EVERYTHING. IT CANNOT SURVIVE IN THE REALM OF CHRIST NOR IN THE WORLD OF ANTICHRIST--PERIOD.]

END OF QUOTING

Scribe, bear with me for we only have three more essays to make it through. It will not be easy for I will insist that every­one reading the SCRIPTURES offered for ALL "christians" are going to be WRONG. They cannot be correct for there was no one NAMED "JESUS" TO BE TRANSLATED. You simply will have to begin to grow up through the concept foisted off on you so that you would succumb to the New World Order One Church Antichrist. Oh, the words will make sense, the "Christed" quality will be integrated to fool you and you will grimace and hate me for my input. You have taken the easy way of the serpents and you are now dead-ended in the trap. How many of you will about-face, revolve around, and walk out again? GOD WAITS.

With 80-plus years of Catholicism and "not catholicism" in his training, how could you expect this man to realize his own er­rors? There is no more shackled a bunch of followers than those housed in the priesthood of such a secret and controlled ORDER as is the Roman Catholic Church, with the centuries and centuries of false teachings and wrong perceptions. You can only be what you believe, no more. You must come to BE­LIEVE in TRUTH--to BE more.

Let us have a rest, please. We can accomplish the work prior to the paper run if we stick right with it and I will give you the en­ergy necessary for the task. Tarry with me for a while in the quiet, please. There shall be peace in the valley where ye dwell for it is my promise unto you--the reward of service beyond call to duty. I salute you and my team and all the readers without whom there would be no need or purpose for our mission. Adonai.

http://www.fourwinds10.net/journals/pdf/J228.pdf