Sept. 28, 2015

PJ-227

CHAPTER 5

REC #2    HATONN

MON., FEB. 2, 1998     9:12 A.M.     YR. 11, DAY 170

MON., FEB. 2, 1998

EARLY WARNING REPORT

On the Front Page of the media press yesterday there were big headlines regarding Clinton's affairs and a smaller one on plans for a military strike on Iraq, AND, A COLUMN DEVOTED TO CLOSING OF MORE MILITARY BASES IN THE U.S.! Do any of you see anything wrong with this picture?

Well, as is usually our "good luck", we get some backup almost immediately when we need it these days and I want to share Richard Maybury's article on this topic. He is the one who pre­sented The New Axis for our sharing and this is very well and insightfully done. I don't even need make further comment ex­cept to advise all people who come into contact with this man, LISTEN TO HIM.

Maybury says, about The New Axis: "I believe a secret alliance against the US has been formed by Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, North Korea, China, Pakistan, Chechnya, Serbia, Sudan and the Taliban in Afghanistan. Other nations may be secretly joining, AMONG THEM SAUDI ARABIA AND KUWAIT."

 

[QUOTING, Early Warning Report, Feb. 1998:]

Dear Reader,

Not only has US military power been slashed, troop morale has been demolished.

The public does not realize that during the Cold War, most deployments were for long periods to permanent bases where troops could live with their families. Today, under Clinton, US troops are world cops for the UN. They are hustled from one war zone to another like pawns on a chessboard. Many are sep­arated from families more than four months per year, every year. The best and brightest are quitting.

The Air Force has a pilot shortage. Pilots have been resign­ing at such high rates that the Air Force does not have enough to fly its planes, despite bomber strength having been cut to 138 planes, from 301 in 1990, and fighter strength to 1,700 from 2,800.

Air Force Times asked pilots: what's wrong? One big com­plaint is that air crews sent to Saudi Arabia for the continual face-offs between Clinton and Saddam Hussein have been for­bidden by the Saudis to fly enough training flights. "It means having combat skills erode dangerously," said the Times.

When a man leaves his family for possible combat on the other side of the world, he likes to think he will have a fair chance of coming back alive. Clinton's Saudi buddies have taken away this fair chance.

I said in the 1/98 EWR that it's likely the Saudis and Kuwaitis are close to switching sides and joining the New Axis. Yet Clinton still uses US military personnel to protect these royal gangsters. [H: Note yesterday that Albright got full coopera­tion from Kuwait--but, can you trust anything these thugs do? If they are outnumbered by the Arab coalition they will join with their "own". Britain and Bush BOUGHT KUWAIT AND BAHRAIN AND DON'T FORGET IT!]

Political power corrupts both the morals and the judgment.

Like Christianity, Islam has various factions, the main ones being the Sunni and Shiite. [H: Keep this information handy, please, so you know the players in this unfolding play.] Saudi Arabia is the center of the Sunni, Iran the Shiite. THE ECONOMIST reports that ever since the December Islamic con­ference I told you about in the 1/98 EWR, Saudi Arabia and Iran are "now being cozily called 'the two wings of Islam' ." I doubt the Saudi rulers have gone over to the New Axis YET. but they must be on the verge.

After all, what sheik would want to depend on protection from a president who can't even control his harem? That's not a joke; it's how they'll really see it. He is their kind of people, except that he's not very good at it.

Chaostan contains at least 80% of the total world oil supply. Its economic troubles are accelerating the shift of alliances. Will 1998 be the Big Year when Chaostan explodes? Stay tuned. Richard Maybury

[H: You won't find "Chaostan" on the map--it is a word of Mr. Maybury's invention to indicate the areas of CHAOS.

There is an inset which might give you a thrill. This is from the NAVY TIMES, George C. Wilson, January 12, 1998: "Nobody knows what the armed forces will be doing in the 21st century. Everybody knows they won't have enough people and guns to do everything the current two-war strategy requires.”]

[END OF QUOTING]

Next: One of our long-time partners has sent a rather interesting observation about KOL NIDRE which I find might wipe out some of the detailed questions we always get regarding possibil­ities and misperceptions. It stands on its own without comment from me:

[QUOTING:]

 

1-31-98

...Having just yesterday finished reading vol. 15, num. 9, of CONTACT (it was a job to get it done in time to receive today num. 10), I have a comment to make regarding the Kol Nidre "prayer" that is supposedly recited at the beginning of the Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) holiday. Technically, it's not said at the beginning of Yom Kipper. Here's why:

In the"Jewish" way of counting days and measuring time, the day ends at sundown and the next day begins just afterwards. The "time" that sundown occurs is easily obtained. It's usually mentioned on the TV evening news. Let's say that it takes 15 minutes to recite the Kol Nidre 3 times and that sundown occurs at exactly 6:00 PM.

The Kol Nidre will then start at 5:44 PM and be completed at 5:59 PM. There will then be a pause of one to two minutes be­fore the opening prayer of Yom Kippur begins. When one is accustomed to the days changing at midnight, it certainly ap­pears that Kol Nidre is the opening "prayer" of Yom Kippur. However, in actual fact, it is (was) said the day before. Why is this? I offer two possible explanations.

One, the "Jews" don't want to "mess" with the holiday itself, and two, (as you have mentioned [I believe] previously in CON­TACT), if the "Jews" have an opportunity to tell the truth or tell a lie, either of which will not "cost" them anything, they will always opt for the lie.

So, the apparency is that Kol Nidre is the opening "prayer" of Yom Kippur, whereas technically, it was said the day before. I know that it is a "small" point, but I wanted to refresh your memory on it.

Thank you for all that you do to bring us The Word. I do greatly appreciate receiving the lessons each week in CON­TACT. Please keep it coming as long as it is possible to do so. With deepest respect, I am--Sincerely, G.M.

 

[END OF QUOTING]

Small thing? NEVER! This is EXACTLY what you have to watch out for in dealing with Antichrist--excellent example.

What did Clinton say about his relationship with Ms. L?? He said "I am not..." Meaning, "At this moment I am not..." This is LAWYER speak. Now what happens when a person gets up in court to object to the use of Kol Nidre by all the attorneys and judges present in the courtroom and says: "The first prayer is... "?? You got it, it will be immediately tossed out of court on the basis of it is not true. Antichrist learns the technique of LY­ING from the day of birthing. It is NOT a small detail and should be placed right now in an easily accessible place for USE.

May we please move on now to our series:

RISE OF ANTICHRIST

PART FOUR

[QUOTING, ANTICHRIST, Coughlin (Circa 1970):]

 

ESSAY FOUR

WAR ON EARTH

 

(A)

It is normal even for men who believe in the existence of the spirit world to underestimate the abilities of angels. As a matter of fact both the intellectual and volitional powers of the most in­significant spirit transcend overpoweringly the faculties of men.

 

In the case of Satan, whom scripture regards as one of the mightiest, he began planning from the outset the destruction of the entire Universe and its multi-billions of galaxies, planets and stars. However, his revenge died aborning because Michael and his hosts already had been placed as custodians to protect God's inanimate creatures. Having become aware of this, Satan's at­tention then focused upon the new intellectual world which was about to dwell upon Earth. Against Adam's progeny, then, he would concentrate his attack. "Strike first at the parent of mankind; then at his children who will inherit the father's fate; then desecrate the image and likeness of God after which each is moulded." (He failed, fortunately, to visualize Mary, the one exception.)

[H: I am not going to interrupt every time there is a miss­peak for it would never allow us to finish this topic. We are dealing with a Priest of the Roman Catholic Church who does not in any way ACTUALLY discount the Bible and the myths--he simply tries to justify some misinterpretations. We now KNOW that this is not the way to TRUTH but it is time YOU pick out the truth from the misperceptions and then TRUTH can be evolved FROM THE WHOLE!

IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER THAT "GARDEN OF EDEN", HOWEVER, WHERE THE AN­TICHRIST DEVIL APPEARED AS A SERPENT. THAT IS A "FACT" IN THAT THE VERY NAME GIVEN SELVES BY THE ANTICHRIST FACTION AND HOW THE TRIBE WAS RECOGNIZED SYMBOLICALLY: THEY WERE THE "SERPENT PEOPLE".

"These persons," said Satan to his fellow prisoners, "are both more precious and vulnerable than the planets. But their inher­ited proclivity to evil, together with their pride and pursuit of illogical freedoms, have made them my certain victims. Them I will capture and for eternity I will hold them in Hell to taunt the Creator. This will be my revenge," so the sacrilegious Satan planned--and planned well.

Despite his mastery of psychology and his superb intellect, Satan miscalculated.

From all eternity God foresaw this satanic plan and under­stood the abysmal weakness of his miscalculation. Satan's mind did not comprehend how the Infinite Creator could interfere with man's inherited sin. [H: WHAT inherited sin? Man is and was made in the perfect image of God Creator--WHAT ORIGINAL OR INHERITED SIN? NEVER FORGET WHILE READING THIS MATERIAL THAT "A MAN" IS OFFERING HIS OWN VIEW IN PERCEPTION OF HOW IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN--NO MORE! There are so many lessons in these Essays that I hesitate to NOT use them but there are so many GROSS MISINTERPRETATIONS THAT TRUTH IS NOT TO BE FOUND. I REMIND YOU THAT YOU CANNOT JUSTIFY SOMETHING INTO "TRUTH" IF THE JUSTIFICATION BASIS IS FOUNDATIONED ON A "LIE". I may have to yet consider not using much more of this volume; however, there is such historical evidence in some of the later essays that need presenting, for a Church Priest to unfold some of the information he shares is abso­lutely beyond mind-expanding.] Satan, not calculating how the progeny of Adam could be pitied by God without His con­doning sin, did not understand how the Infinite, just God could also be an Infinite, merciful God. That was a major miscalcula­tion. Nor did Satan suspect the workings of Mercy because an­gels, with their errorproof intellects, even in the time of their probation, failed to conceive the quality of mercy. Mercy is in­tended for those who, through circumstances beyond their con­trol, are not totally the prisoners of Justice even though they in­herit the punishment due to sin. In the court of mercy they can plead for a second chance.

This, then, was an intellectual depth not sounded by the mighty Satan. This, then, was the basis for God's eternal plan­ning to organize a human army to withstand Satan and his fallen hosts; a human army whose every individual could lay claim for a second chance.

That men had been victimized by their firstparents; that Adam's progeny had no option to reject his sin was certain. Thus, the infinite Wisdom unfolded the plan of His infinite Mercy: "I will send my Son to Earth. He will be both true man and true God. He will found an army of men who will believe in Him. I, the Christ, will use the despised mancreature to overwhelm and conquer Satan. I, the Christ, will surrender my life to compensate for the sins of both angel and man against the Godhead. And I, the Anointed, will elevate fallen men from being incompetents into warriors armed with invincible weaponry of grace. Men will become personages mystically united in body and soul with Me, and have as their leader, the Paraclete, against Whom 'The gates of hell shall not prevail."

[H: THIS IS THE BIGGEST BUNCH OF NONSENSE I HAVE YET READ AND THE WORST DIALOGUE YET PUT INTO THE MOUTH OF "THE CHRIST" BY WHAT­EVER NAME. GOD DID NOT COME TO YOUR PLANET TO SAVE YOU, DIE FOR YOU, BLEED FOR YOU, OR DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN BRING YOU THE TRUTH. OBVIOUSLY, NO-BODY HEARD THE TRUTH AND STILL DO NOT HEAR THE TRUTH!! CAN YOU NOW, PERHAPS, UNDERSTAND WHY YOU MUST NOT JUST TAKE ANOTHER'S CONCEPTS AND OPINIONSAS YOUR OWN LEST YOU FALL TO DOOM OFF THAT CLIFF OF­FERED TO YOU?]

"Meanwhile, having accomplished My mission, I shall wait while generation after generation of men will constantly battle Satan until final victory." [H: Ah, but nobody has battled Sa­tan--you have all taken the bait, swallowed the LIES, and NOBODY HAS BATTLED SATAN FOR YOU DIDN'T EVEN KNOW WHO WAS SATAN! WORSE, HOW COULD YOU BATTLE?--YOU DIDN'T KNOW WHO YOU WERE OR ARE!]

Pardon the above humanistic paragraphs and such unworthy words as if they were spoken by God. It was simply an [my] ef­fort to emphasize the preparations made by the Godhead to sub­due Satan for eternity.

[H: By the way, God will and never has had a problem sub­duing Satan so to ascertain that God had to prepare for all these eons of time is a foolish assumption. God creates; God uncreates. Therefore the lessons are ALL for you-the-peo­ple. And, furthermore, until you get TRUTH as your LIGHT leading the way--you will never know "subduing Sa­tan". You have no desire nor want to subdue Satan so don't lie to selves. You want a savior and body-snatcher to Rap­ture you to somewhere wondrous without responsibility for HERE or THERE. You love the things of Satan in the physical environment and certainly will NOT object to a few indiscretions to get them in the realization of "having stuff'. You can have abundance THROUGH GOD AND HAVE TRUTH, SALVATION AND FREEDOM. Why, oh why, do you so struggle to remain shackled to ANTICHRIST? FREEDOM COMES WITH CUTTING LOOSE THAT BASTARD FROM HELL, THAT PARASITE WHO SUCKS EVERY LAST DROP OF BLOOD FROM YOUR SOUL AND BEING! ANTICHRIST HAS STOLEN YOUR "CHRIST" AND YOU NEVER EVEN FLINCH--JUST TAG ALONG ON THE WRONG ROAD WHILE PLAYING AT PETER COTTONTAIL GAMES. YOU WILL NOT FIND "CHRIST" ON A CROSS IN ISRAEL--YOU WILL FIND "CHRIST" BOTH WITHIN SELF AND WITHIN THE FREEDOM OF THE PERFECTION OF THE HEAVENS, SILLY BABIES. YOU CANNOT HANG "CHRIST" ANY MORE THAN YOU CAN HANG THE WIND. GROW UP.

It's too hard to "let go" of tradition and training? WHY? If you were told you have a pile of gold you just purchased and it turned out, when you needed your selling profits, that it was yellow-covered lead--what would you do? You WOULD let go and perhaps, even, go get the scroungey nincompoop who did you the dirt. Did that ever occur to you when per­taining to the lying thieves of your soul and life? So be it, for some "too hard" is simply too hard and you will jump off the cliff to prove you have the right to kill self.]

In brief, Satan was trapped by his pride which indicated that God's Justice would make it impossible for Him to utilize the unknown virtue of Mecy.

During the nineteenth and twentieth centuries christianity has had its glories. Not since the days of Peter and Paul was the missionary activity in the church surpassed.[H: NOR WERE THE ATROCITIES OF THE MISSIONARIES AND MIS­LEADING PRESSURES OF THE CHURCH GREATER. THERE WERE NEVER GLORIES IN THAT WHICH IS RECOGNIZED AS THE "CHRISTIAN CHURCH"--WHAT ABOUT THE CRUSADES AND BLOODSHED? WHAT ABOUT THE GREAT INQUISITIONS? WHAT ABOUT THE BURNING, IN THE NAME OF JESUS, THE PEOPLE SUPPOSED TO BE WITCHES AND PSYCHICS? YOU ARE LUCKY TO BE ALIVE, YOU WITH ANY INSIGHT AT ALL.

PETER WAS A COP-OUT AND HIS REAL STORY WAS BURIED FOR CENTURIES. THE "PAUL" SPOKEN OF HERE WAS SAUL OF TARSUS AND ONE OF THE MOST EVIL MEN OF THE DAY AND THE ARCHENEMY OF THE TEACHER AND "CHRIST". HANGING ONTO THESE FALSE IMAGES IS GOING TO DESTROY YOU AS SURELY AS THE CUP OF HEMLOCK GOT OLD SOCRATES.] Vocations were nurtured in parish schools. Seminaries were filled with ardent students; convents were filled with human angels of Mary Immaculate.[H: NO, NO AND NO! These places were filled with those who were misled and became further steeped into and forced within the LIES. Perhaps the next paragraph might well have some in­sight:]

Possibly these years outshone the splendor of the thirteenth century. Not only bishops, priests and dedicated young nuns enrolled in the army of the Church Militant; there were at least 500-million baptized and confirmed lay persons in a world pop­ulation of 2-1/4 billion.

[H: THIRTEENTH CENTURY? My oh my, that coincides exactly with the takeover of Antichrist through the Khazar­ian tribes still referred to as Serpent People. Let me make a side quotation here from HISTORICAL FACT:]

 

[QUOTING:]

In the Latin St. Jerome 4th century Vulgate Edition of the New Testament Jesus is referred to by the Genitive Plural of "Iudaeus" in the Gospel by John reference to the inscription on the Cross -- "Iudaeorum". It was in the 4th century that St. Jerome translated into Latin the manuscripts of the New Testa­ment from the original languages in which they were written.

This translation by St. Jerome is referred to still today as the Vulgate Edition by the Roman Catholic Church authorities, who use it today. [H: So, where has Father Coughlin been hid­ing?]

Jesus is referred as a so-called "Jew" for the first time in the New Testament IN THE 18TH CENTURY editions in the EN­GLISH LANGUAGE of the 14th century first translations of the New Testament into English. The history of the origin of the word "Jew" in the English language leaves no doubt that the 18th century "Jew" is the 18th century contracted and corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin "Iudaeus" found in St. Jerome's Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no longer doubt. [H: Hang on, I am getting to the thirteenth century.]

The available original manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century accurately trace the origin and give the complete history of the word "Jew" in the English language. In these manuscripts are to be found all the many earlier English equiv­alents extending through the 14 centuries from the 4th to the 18th century. From the Latin "Iudaeus" to the English "Jew" these English forms included successively "Gyu", "giu", "Iu", "Iuu", "Iuw", "Ieuu", "Ieuy", "Iwe", low", "Iewe", "Ieue", "Iue", lye", "Iew", and then finally in the 18th century, "Jew". the many earlier English equivalents for "Jews" through the 14th centuries are "Giwis", "Giws", "Gyues", "Gywes", "Giwes", "Geus", "Iuys", lows", "Iouis", "Iews", and then also finally in the 18th century, "Jews".

[H: Ok, lets try the 13th century on for just the presence of the word "Jesus" and YOU WILL NOT FIND IT. WHAT WILL YOU FIND? YOU ARE GOING TO FIND RIGHT HERE AND NOW THAT "JESUS" WAS ACTUALLY ES­TABLISHED AS A WORD IN ABOUT THE 14TH CEN­TURY AD. THIS EVEN LEAVES OLD SAUL THE GOAT, OUT.]

...By this adopting-adapting process the Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek "Ioudaios" finally emerged in the 18th century as "Jew" in the English language. The English speaking peoples struggled through 14 centuries seeking to create for the English language an English equivalent for the Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek "Ioudaios" which could be easily pronounced in English from its English spelling. The English "Jew" was the resulting 18th century contracted and corrupted form of the Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek "Ioudaios". The English "Jew" is eas­ily pronounced in English from its English spelling. The Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek "Ioudaios" cannot be as easily pro­nounced in English from the Latin and Greek spelling. They were forced to coin a word.

[H: NOW PAY ATTENTION!]

The earliest version of the New Testament in English from the Latin Vulgate Edition is the Wiclif, or Wickliffe Edition, (a man), published in 1380. In the Wiclif Edition JESUS is there mentioned as One of the "iewes". That was the 14th century English version of the Latin "Iudaeus" and was pronounced "hew-weeze", in the plural, and "iewe" pronounced "Hew-wee" in the singular. In the 1380 Wiclif Edition in English the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads "Ihihesus of nazareth kyng of the iewes". Prior to the 14th century the English language adopted the Anglo-Saxon "kyng" together with many other Anglo-Saxon words in place of the Latin "rex" and the Greek "basileus". The Anglo-Saxon also meant "tribal leaders".

[H: I think we might leave this little inset of information with you and continue ahead--but, you had best understand something: that "JESUS" was a fabrication of the JEWS any way you cut it--and was not ESU IMMANUEL, THE TEACHER. YOU HAVE FOLLOWED THE LIES UNTIL YOU CAN'T EVEN SEE WHEN YOU HAVE BEEN "HAD" AND YOUR REFUSAL TO SEE IS FAR MORE IMPOR­TANT THAN YOUR "IGNORANCE".]

[END OF QUOTING]

Now, continuing with our original document on Antichrist:

[H: Get the misinformation in this last sentence before starting on part (B):]

Satan played dead while he and his mystical body were  preparing to launch a new attack on God's church Militant.

[H: Played DEAD? Satan has never played "dead"--he has never had to even consider slacking off his gathering of fools nor has he ever had to "launch a new attack" on anything--HE WROTE THE BOOK OF INSTRUCTIONS, INCLUD­ING THE PROPHECIES AND THE ENDING HAPPEN­INGS, TO COVER HIS DASTARDLY APOCALYPSE AND ARMAGEDDON TO END HIS PLAY. YOU HAVE SUCKED IT IN HOOK, LINE, SINKER, AND DEAD FISH.]

[END OF QUOTING]

I'm pushing the clock and making it difficult for the paper staff if they have to delay layout longer. This is a good place to break, anyway, before part (B) and so we shall.

You who would be free must look at these things and do a bit of homework and research for it is ALL there for your confirma­tion. Is it not time to stop deceiving SELF?

ANTICHRIST has tried every trick in his book to make you the Fool. He cannot succeed unless YOU ALLOW HIM TO DO SO. AT THIS POINT HE IS THE FOOL--CAN'T YOU LEAVE IT THAT WAY?

It has been speculated that the ships going home to God Creator may well be nigh empty--so be it for Satan HAS NO SHIPS--PERIOD, AND HAS NO HOUSING FOR ANYONE ON ANY CLOUDS OR OTHERWISE. FACE IT, PEOPLE, YOU HAVE BEEN SORELY TRICKED!

WHEN YOU FOLLOW A "NAME" PRESENTED IN ANY FORMAT AND GIVEN INSTRUCTIONS TO EITHER FOLLOW A "MAN" OR A PHYSICAL "THING"--YOU HAVE TAKEN THE POISON. A "MAN'S BLOOD" IS BUT A PHYSICAL "SUBSTANCE" AND HAS NO POWER BE­YOND SUFFICING FOR THE INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM IT BELONGS. BESURE YOU GET ANGRY AT THE COR­RECT PARTIES, READERS; GOD IS ABOUT TIRED OF THE GAME-PLAYING ON BOTH "THEIR" PART AND "YOURS". ADONAI.

http://www.fourwinds10.net/journals/pdf/J227.pdf