Aug. 7, 2014

PJ-14

CHAPTER 4

 

REC #1 DHARMA/ATON

 

FRIDAY, APRIL 13, 1990   9:00 A.M.      YEAR 3 DAY 240

 

Aton present to commune. I AM and I command all brothers to remain in receiving for my message is also a statement unto the troubled souls. Allow for the receiving but total clearance from mine chelas' spaces. None of dark­ness shall be allowed entry within the light until such time as evil is discarded. Ye shall be given to hear so that all shall have opportunity to regain the pres­ence of Godness. Peace and blessings be thine.

 

In the peaceful order of the universal cosmos was your planet birthed. This time of remembered resurrection shall also bring many hearts into the longing for the presence of God and the healing of a Mother Planet. Amidst the beauty of the lilies shall come the breath of truth in the winds of change and renewal. Oh, would you but hear my voice that the leafing of the fig would only mean the bearing of its fruit. It could be so, if ye would but hear my call. Ye were given free-will that you would grow in wholeness and maturity of that which is sorted from the darkness. The Light can yet sweep  thine lands and change of the ending if you will but see and he and follow me.

 

The Wayshowers have been sent unto you but YOU must listen and hear that voice which is God's within thine bosoms--the song within thy mind. SEE the beauty of mine lilies and smell their fragrance for they are the sign of life in a new season of glory. Look into the perfection within the heart of the blossom and bring it within your heart. Behold the illy for it has become symbol of your resurrection--not the flower of the grave. Behold the lily for it contains all within self to sustain floral rebirthing unto the withering--then does it re­produce its offspring. Can you not be as the lily? Can you not store of that which ye need, within, that you might blossom and  bear fruit from thy being-ness? Note that the lily will lie dormant if the life support is not available. Mine people lie dormant, for the life is held within and ye have but to bring it without that it might blossom in the light. A flower always blossoms in the Light even though it may "open" in the night--for The Creation is balance in perfection. Ye are perfection if ye would move away from the desecration of your wondrous beings. Look unto the lily this day and bend your knee unto its perfection for the story of life rests in her beauty. Not just within that which you label Easter Lily--for some of the most tiny creatures of the deserts are lilies. Often from the very gift of the root, bulb, tuber, comes life for other creatures from the food and waters stored within and gladly shared. Thine relation invites you to look within and take the beauty unto thineself. Oberli, bring a lily into this dwelling for it will lend you strength for the days ahead. All of you--bring  within thine dwellings a Ely for they are abundant in the markets and allow its beauty to enfold you--get two or three and behold their sameness and their unique difference---LOOK at the lily and not at the backdrop decoration" for a religious spectacular. Look at the sunrise for the enduring gift of life it proves unto you--not just on Easter morning among the trappings of the decorators. Sit on thine own hillside and breathe  with the Mother and pray for her healing for if each nurtures and heals, she shall be recovered into wholeness. Ye forget mine "other" promises--ye shall be deliv­ered up! But, there is work to be done in the "vineyards". The vineyards must be tended and nurtured lest the vines bear no fruit.

 

The wild lilies of the field I shall tend--you must tend of the vineyards. Think upon these things. Once YOU have taken mine children unto your dominion then you have also accepted the responsibility of their survival for you have created a false environment whereby a thing cannot survive without your tending. To see an orchard die is painful indeed, for the tree failed you not--you have failed the tree for it cannot remove itself to another placement. It can only pray its seed falls in fertile soil elsewhere that its existence can he remembered. Blessed are ye who tend of mine creations and it all must begin and end within each--naught can be left unto "another". If ye cannot do of the task alone in thine physicalness--ye must gather together and become as one to act together. But it always requires only one to begin.

 

The resurrection must be from your land, your continent, for the hand of op­pression has darkened the blessed garden of beginning. Ye have all but waited too long, but if ye will SEE and HEAR, the resurrection and the life can be reborn. However, ye cannot "sit" and ye can "wait" no longer--it re­quires ALL. Just as the Master Teacher cleared of the temple, you must clear of the temple and the halls of government. If ye stand together and offer them not the life support which they have stolen and drained from your very beings-- you shall prevail for they have naught but you to depend upon for sur­vival. Ye of Light have the universe--evil has only evil man upon which to draw his life existence. Remove the life source from evil and refuse it trans­fusion  and it shall wither for the conspirators and evil slave-masters are only functional in the physical. They cannot  survive save YOU allow of it. Furthermore, once you remove the life support system from the ignorant who "play” and perceive reward from  participation with evil, shall come to see and will join with you--first of necessity of survival and then from the Light which shall be rebirthed within by the very association with God instead of Satan.

 

Oberli, blessed son, see to it that the lesson on AIDS regarding "behavior" is enclosed within this document Journal. It has not gone forth unto the public in great measure but it must be added within for now we have documentation of behavior which has appalled the readers who say it cannot be so! Do you see that most who claim to be homosexual lovers do not even believe that such behavior can actually "be".  I have told you ones to love your fellow-man that you may become as God--I denounce behavior which destroys deliber­ately, my creations.

 

Dharma, I would have you display the writing regarding the homosexual art exhibit just as it is written in the document presented unto you. These are the hidden things which YOUR tax money are spent upon. And then, chela, we will speak of that which is Israel who claim to be mine people--they are ser­vants of Satan himself. See that the portion regarding the amount of funds requested and required for Israel be compared against your United States children who must forfeit the only meal (that of the school lunch) of their day because the government has completely depleted the milk and cheese supply and funding has been cut to send to political places elsewhere--ye have for­saken your own babies to play the evil game of politics and global control. If I must shock you into action, so be it.

 

Ye of the Phoenix Remnant must survive. Amen.

 

*****

QUOTE:

 

Examples of how the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) uses your tax dollars:

 

* Honored Andres Serrano with $15,000 in tax dollars in a com­petition sponsored by the NEA. Serrano's work of art was a photo of Christ submerged in Serrano's urine. Serrano named the "work of art" Pi--Christ.

 

* The NEA spent $30,000 to fund the homosexual photography of Robert Mapplethorpe whose taxpayer-funded exhibit included these photos: Honey, a little girl about four years old with a sad, scarred face, but the focus of the camera is on the girl's genitals be­low her uplifted dress; a man crouched over, his penis on a block, named Mr. 10 and a Half; a man dressed in a three-piece suit, entitled Man in Polyester Suit, which focuses on his exposed sexual organ; a nude, standing man with an erection; one man urinating in another man's mouth (homosexuals call it "golden showers"); and, one man with his fist and forearm up another man's rectum (homosexuals call this "fisting").

 

*  Time magazine said that had this not been supported by the NEA the exhibitor probably would have been charged with dis­tribution of pornography.

 

 *   MARS Artspace of Phoenix, Arizona was given $20,000 by the NEA to help fund an exhibit including Cactus Jack's Pi--Helms, a photo of Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) in a large jar of urine.

 

*   With NEA help, Political Action Documentation Distribution and Carnival Knowledge cosponsored entertainment including a number called Tapping and Talking Dirty, in which two feminists ca­sually chatted about fellatio and swallowing sperm.

 

*   The NEA provided $40,000 to Gay Sunshine Press to publish sexually explicit homosexual stories and $25,000 to the Panjandum Press for the same purpose. In New York, NEA funding went toward an exhibit which included one female homosexual inserting a dildo into another, one female homosexual inserting her foot into another, a photo album of group sex, a collection of drawings which included one entitled Jesus Sucks depicting a mammoth woman breast-feeding an infant. Another photo was of a man asking, "Is it a sin to f--- a priest?"

 

*   The organizers of the 1990 San Francisco Lesbian and Gay Film Festival expect to receive $20,000 from the NEA. The arts en­dowment provided $10,000 in tax funds for an exhibit in which angry homosexuals denounced Catholic John Cardinal O'Connor, calling him "a fat cannibal" and a "creep in black skirts," while St. Patrick's Cathedral was depicted as the "house of walking swastikas on Fifth Ave n ue."

 

*   An exhibit entitled "Annie Sprinkle: Post-Porn Modernist," re­ceived $25,000 in taxpayer's money from the WA. (Miss Sprinkle has appeared in more than 150 X-rated pornographic movies).

 

*   The art exhibit included Miss Sprinkle's live performances at the Kitchen Theatre in New York City, consisting of, among other things, the "artist" spreading her legs and inviting the audience to inspect her vagina and cervix with the aid of a flashlight, masturbating to orgasm and performing with several dildos. As part of the federally funded art exhibit Annie did the following:

 

*   Invoked the spirits of "ancient sacred temple prostitutes" into the theater. During the performance, Miss Sprinkle said her sexual obsessions are "new age" spirituality and likened her act to ancient sacred prostitutes and Taoist masters who could lengthen their or­gasms. She also prayed with the audience to invoke the spirits of past sex goddesses. "I like to evoke spirits," she told the crowd, "They love having sex."

 

*   In the "art exhibit," Annie Sprinkle mounted an altar of candles and lit them to honor what she said were former friends and lovers who had died from AIDS. She then prayed to their spirits, lit incense and, with the audience chanting along and applauding, induced her­self to orgasm with a vibrator.

 

*   Miss Sprinkle performed oral sex on dildos and invited the au­dience to massage her breasts and to photograph her scantily clad body.

 

*   Then, amid a background chorus of loud voices of angry men shouting curses and insults at her, Miss Sprinkle began vigorous oral sex with various dildos which were supposed to represent what she termed abusive sexual partners.

 

*   To conclude her performance, Miss Sprinkle opened her vagi­nal canal with a gynecological tool known as a speculum, and invited the audience to the stage to inspect her cervix with a flashlight.

 

* After the show, some 50 men and women paid $5 each to have pictures taken with Miss Sprinkle's large breasts resting atop their heads.

 

* At one point during Annie Sprinkle's "art exhibit"--after inducing the first orgasm with her favorite "sex toys"--she smiled and said to the audience, "Usually I get paid a lot of money for this but tonight IT'S GOVERNMENT FUNDED."

 

END QUOTE.

 

And what of your President? Ile has also entered the fray of considered "control" of funding by announcing he would consider attempts to control NEA funding as CENSORSHIP. But Bush also said "I am deeply offended by some material presented here as extremely offensive."

 

Oh, my children, can you not wake up and see that which has been pulled down upon you? I weep for ye are so blind.

 

Now, what of the school lunches? A fact sheet released by the Agriculture Committee stated that the scope of the hunger and poverty is severe. An es­timation of above 12.4 million American children--one in five--live in total poverty.

 

Of the 18 million Americans receiving food stamps, 83% of the food stamp assistance goes to families with children. Of the 15 million Americans who get emergency bags of groceries each month from the TEFAP program (Temporary Emergency Food Assistance Program,) an estimated 48% of TEFAP benefits go to families with children. This program gives out "four-day" bags of groceries per person per month (surplus flour, cornmeal, butter, beans, peanut butter, beans, canned meat, raisins, egg mix, or other items).

 

During the 1980's--the decade of the "Recovery," hunger has spread across your nation. In New York City alone, there are over 600 soup kitchens where in 1980 there were 30.

 

The program called WIC (Women, Infants and Children) food supplement program, is serving a wider group every year, but due to funding limits, only 60% of the eligible pregnant women, infants and children are enrolled for nu­trition and the amount of food is marginally survival quantity at best.

 

The infant mortality rate in the U.S. ranks 19th out of the 20 most industrial­ized nations. Each year 40,000 infants die before their first birthday---DOES THIS NOT SHOCK YOU?

 

The food relief pinch has now turned into a full-blown crisis in your country. In August of 1989, the USDA officially cancelled distributing federal "surplus" cheese and nonfat dried milk powder to the federal school lunch programs, the WIC, and other supplemental food aid projects. Hundreds of food banks and soup kitchens have been forced to shut down and hundreds of lunch pro­grams have closed or turned to cheap, low grade snacks.

 

As a most disastrous correlation to the lessening of nutrition, the children have dramatic upturns in damage from childhood disease that ordinarily should not he fatal or particularly harmful.

 

Yet, in the face of this knowledge, the Bush administration's 1990 Farm Bill, and current actions of the USDA make a total mockery of those suffering.

 

In January, Agriculture Secretary Clayton Yeutter cut the floor price for dairy Farmers by 50 cents a hundred pounds (of raw, farm milk), saying he didn't want to encourage milk production. At present, there are no stocks in sight of milk powder or cheese to relieve hunger. You have already been told by Ha­tonn, that your grain silos for storage of surplus and reserve grain are emptied and the supplies shipped overseas.

 

In February, the new Bush Farm Bill called for stiffer procedures to allow fewer school children to qualify for free or subsidized lunches. ANOTHER MEASURE CALLS FOR DIMINUTION OR ELIMINATION OF FOOD RE­LIEF TO A SINGLE PARENT HOUSEHOLD WITH CHILDREN, WHERE THE RELEVANT PARENT WAS DELINQUENT IN CHILD SUPPORT! (sic, sic)- further punish and destroy the child!

                                                             

NO SCHOOL LUNCHES

 

The leading item of the testimony to the Senate was a great sleight of hand trick used by the administration on the issue of cutting school lunch support. The administration's 1990 Farm Bill actually calls for an additional $100 mil­lion in financial aid authorization, BUT BECAUSE OF THE CHANGES IN CALCULATING HOW MANY CHILDREN IN ANY DISTRICT QUAL­IFY FOR FEDERAL LUNCH SUBSIDIES, THERE WILL ACTUALLY BE $300 MILLION LESS IN FEDERAL OVERALL SUPPORT!

 

In addition, there is projected to be less and less federal "surplus" bulk food commodities for the schools. The testimony from local food program  officials around the nation gives a grave and terrible picture indeed.

 

The administration is proposing changes to the child nutrition programs that would reduce federal support by $516 million, with $235.4 million coming from the School Lunch Program. This reduction in federal funds would be on top of the $300 million loss in bonus commodities you have experienced over the last several years. In addition, the administration's school lunch proposal would create a fourth income category that would require school administra­tors to document and verify the household income of the vast majority of all U.S. households with children in school.

 

P.S.: In Japan, 98% of all children in elementary school receive a school lunch. In the U.S., you will serve 2 million children A DAY less than you did before the 1981 budget cuts.

 

BACK ON GOLGOTHA

 

Over and above the $3 BILLION a year Israel is guaranteed under the terms of your Camp David Peace accord PLUS the $742 MILLION in special ap­propriations Israel received on top of that in 1989 alone, there is now an al­most guaranteed gift of $400 MILLION additional loan guarantees to finance the construction of housing for Soviet Jewish immigrants and/or - - - -!

 

So, a few changes in the program's bylaws must first be effected. For one thing, there is a $100 million cap on the entire program as laid forth by law. For another, there is a $25 million annual limit on the dollar amount of any guarantees that can be provided to any one country.

 

But Congress is bending the rules for Israel. They will waive the management fees normally charged to foreign governments benefiting from the program. The standard fee is 1 percent of the total amount of the loan, plus 0.5 percent charged annually. This will save Israel $4 million off the top and an additional $2 million annually. The charges to other countries, however, will be in­creased to offset the outlay.

 

Israel already has a per-capita income greater than all other countries receiv­ing assistance. But more importantly, however, is that Israel will be exempt from accountability on how it spends the money. Normally the right to moni­tor and veto any proposed construction projects is mandatory--not with this and not with Israel. This would do two things; allow the funds to be diverted to the higher-income brackets of people and disallow any interference in the building on the West Bank which has been claimed as unacceptable by the Bush administration. Seventy three  of your 100 Senators requested that no sum be cut from aid to Israel---only 27 of your representatives didn't sign the letter of petition to Bush. A list will be supplied to any requesting same.

 

 

YOUR CONGRESS HAS BEEN PURCHASED,

YOUR COUNTRY SOLD!

 

Dharma, please just copy the article, Foreigners Buy Congress from the 4/16/90 SPOTLIGHT.

 

QUOTE:

 

James P. Tucker Jr.: The Establishment media, in a glaring ex­ample of biased news "management," was utterly silent about the release of a major new study by a Middle East institute that shows that Congress has been purchased, literally, by a foreign  government.

 

These grim charges, with convincing documentation, were pre­sented to a roomful of reporters at the National Press Club in Wash­ington on March 26.

 

Reverting to its 40-year tradition prior to the Palestinian revolt against the Israeli occupiers--the Establishment press took detailed notes, asked innocuous questions--and ignored the shocking story.

 

The indictment of the Israel lobby by Richard Curtiss and his American Education Trust had been officially defined as a bona fide news event by the national Press Club, under the category "morning newsmaker".

 

Such status is second only to the famous luncheons at which all U.S. presidents and many world leaders speak. It is not a "press con­ference" where the rooms must be rented and other costs incurred by those with something to say to the media. Despite this distinction, however, the story was buried.

 

Curtiss and Andrew Kilgore, a retired career foreign service offi­cer, went beyond simply identifying the scores of congressmen who have been bought by the Israel lobby; they also carefully explained the manner in which U.S. laws have been circumvented.

 

While each political action committee (PAC) is limited to a $5,000 donation to individual candidates, "if you have 26 PACs with the same agenda you can give $130,000", Curtiss said.

 

There are a total of 85 Israel PACs which collected $12 million and gave $5 million to congressmen in the 1988 campaign, Curtiss said.

 

The Israel PACs "without exception" resort to bland, deceptive names, such as the "Hudson Valley PAC" and the "Desert Caucus PAC" to disguise themselves, Curtiss said.

 

The Israeli lobby uses its immense funds both as a carrot and a stick, he said.

 

"A candidate  may not need, the  money, but fear that his op­ponent may get it if he votes wrong, keeps him in line" Curtiss pointed Out.

 

The American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the of­ficial Israel lobby, controls the 85 PACs which have funnelled $5 mil­lion to congressmen, they charged. AIPAC is an agent of a foreign government but avoids registering as such on the "technicality" that all the funds are raised in the United States, Curtiss said. AIPAC is not itself a political action committee (PAC), but critics charge that it directs the money spent by PACs to candidates it approves, thus coordinating campaign donations and circumventing the law.

 

VIRTUAL VETO

 

The Israel lobby has a virtual veto on congressional legislation, as well as the power to force through any legislation that advances the interests of Israel, Curtiss said.

 

For example, any arms sales to Arab countries must first be cleared with the Israel lobby before being approved by Congress, he said. The Israel lobby uses its money-generated influence in Congress and the State Department to make sure America is unable to develop favorable relationships with any Arab states, he said.

 

Curtiss contrasted Congress's preoccupation with smoking--ban­ning cigarettes on domestic flights, for example, because "they kill"--and its apparent unconcern over the fact that the "policies of the pro-Israel PACs got a lot of Americans killed."

 

He was referring to the 270 Marines killed while they were sta­tioned in Lebanon after Israel's brutal invasion in 1982.

 

While denouncing terrorism, Curtiss said it has "become the last resort of desperate people" outraged over America's pro-Israel poli­cies, which have resulted in the deaths of American servicemen, busi­nessmen, diplomats and tourists.

 

The immense impact of the Israel lobby's money is demon­strated, he said, by the fact that the $5.4 million provided by 78 of its PACs to congressional candidates in 1988 was countered by only $38,000 contributed by three pro-Arab PACs--meaning they were outspent by a 141-to-one ratio.

 

Why the overkill?

 

For every dollar  spent by its lobbies, Israel  received $1,105 in direct American aid Curtiss said. Israel has, for decades, been the largest recipient of American tax dollars and currently receives $3.5 billion in direct aid. Frequently Israeli "debts" incurred by "arms pur­chases" from the United States are "forgiven" in legislation unnoticed by the public.

 

Documents given the press show that 366 of 435 incumbent House members and 42 of 50 incumbent senators have taken money from the Israel lobby.

 

From 1978 to 1989 the biggest Senate recipients were Paul Si­mon (D-IIL) $422,490; Howard  Metzenbaum (D-Ohio) $327,460; Car1 Levin (D-Mich.) $295,038; Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) $287,130; Frank Lautenberg  (D-N.J.) $284,750; Alan Cranston (D-Calif.) $254,532; Dave Durenberger (R-Minn.) $277,500; Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) $222,930; Harry Reid  (D-Nev) $208,540; and Rudy Boschwitz (R-Minn.) $207,755. (You might also just suppose these ones' names are on the petition to not cut Israel's funding.)

 

Biggest House recipients were Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) $147,166; Lawrence Smith (D-Fla.) $140,968; Howard Wolpe (D-Mich.) $123,150; Peter Kostmayer (D-Pa.) $119,900; Sam Gejdenson(D- Conn.) $115,604; Dante Fascell (D-Fla.) $111,250; John Miller (R- Wash.) $96,128; Ed Feighan (D-Ohio) $93,200; Matthew Martinez (D-Calif.) $76,000; and David Obey  (D-Wis.) $74,400.

 

Oberli, I believe we shall not wait for ones to write and request the list of sen­ators referred to above (See following page.) Let us just photocopy the list and add to this portion. YOU ONES SHOULD SEE WHO SELLS YOUR COUNTRY WHILE YOU AREN'T LOOKING--AND YES, YOU DID GIVE THEM PERMISSION---YOU VOTED THEM INTO THEIR OF­FICES TO LEAD YOU AND ACT IN YOUR BEHALF AND YOU PAY THEM GRANDLY TO DO THAT SERVICE FOR YOU THESE LITTLE GIFTS ARE IN ADDITION TO THE GREAT SALARIES AND OTHER  PERKS OF OFFICE! So be it, for if ye lock the foxes in the hen house, expect the chicks to be eaten.

 

Ali yes, chela, it is time for introspection this Eastertide, pagan or christian, jew or gentile--for it is the self-chosen elite who are determining your demise. It is up to you as to that which ye shall do about it.

 

Hopeless? Nay, nay! All you need do is see and hear that which is about you and you will know that which you must do--and do it!  It will require that all of you get off your backsides, turn off the vidiot boxes and READ BE­TWEEN THE LINES AND HEAR THAT WHICH IS NOT SAID AND  YE SHALL KNOW THAT  WHICH YE MOST DO! ASK ME--YE NEED NOT GO THROUGH DHARMA OR ANOTHER SPOKESMAN--ASK ME AND THEN LISTEN AND I SHALL TELL YOU!

 

Dharma, it has been too long a sitting without a break to continue with your queries, but these things, too, must be brought into your attention for if you know not the facts and truth, you are destined to perishment. Truth and knowledge will surely set you free! So be it.

 

Allow us a break please.

 

I AM ATON--I AM THE LIGHT, COME WALK WITH ME.

 

 

 

 

*****

 

THE LIST OF SENATORS

 

    The following is the list of                          Harry Reid ( D-Nev.)

senators who signed a letter to               Donald W. Riegle (D-Mich.)

President George Bush asking                Charles S. Robb (D-Va.)

him not to reduce foreign aid                         John D. Rockefeller IV ( D-W.Va.)

to Israel.                                              Paul S. Sarbanes (D-Md.)

Brock Adams (D-Wash.)                       Jim Sasser (D-Tenn.)

Max Baucus (D-Mont.)                                  Richard C. Shelby (D-Ala.)

Lloyd Bentsen (D-Texas)                       Paul Simon (D-Ill.)

Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.)                  Arlen Specter ( R-Pa, )

Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.)                        John W. Warner ( R-Va )

Christopher Bond (R-Mont.)                  Pete Wilson (R-Calif.)

David L. Boren (D-Okla.)                      Timothy E. Wirth (D-Colo.)

Rudy Boschwitz (R-Minn.)

Bill Bradley (D-N.J.)                                 The following members did

John B. Breaux (D-La.)                                  not sign the letter opposing

Richard H. Bryan (D-Nev.)                    cuts in foreign aid.

Quentin N. Burdick (D-N.D.)                         William L. Armstrong (R-Colo.)

Conrad Burns (R-Mont.)                        Dale Bumpers (D-Ark.)

Dan Coats (R-Ind.)                                Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.)

Thad Cochran (R-Miss.)                                 John H. Chafee (R-R.I.)

William S. Cohen (R-Maine)                  Robert Dole (R-Kan.)

Kent Conrad (D-N.D.)                           Pete V. Domenici (R-N.M.)

Alan Cranston (D-Calif.)                       Jake Garn (R-Utah)

Alfonse M. D'Amato (R-N.Y.)                Mark O. Hatfield (R-Ore.)

John C. Danforth (R-Mo.)                     Jesse Helms (R-N.C.)

Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.)                          Ernest F. Hollings (D-S.C.)

Dennis DeConcini (D-Ariz.)                  James M. Jeffords (R-Vt.)

Alan J. Dixon (D-Ill.)                            Nancy Kassebaum (R-Kan.)

Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.)              Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa)

David Durenberger (R-Minn.)                        Tom Harkin (D-Iowa)

J. James Exon (D-Neb.)                                 Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah)

Wendell H. Ford (D-Ky.)                      Howell Heflin (D-Ala.)

Wyche Fowler Jr. (D-Ga.)                     John Heinz (R-Pa.)

John Glenn (D-Ohio)                            Gordon J. Humphrey (R-N.H.)

Albert Gore Jr. (D-Tenn.)                      Daniel K. Inouye (D-Hawaii)

Slade Gorton (R-Wash.)                                 J. Bennett Johnston (D-La.)

Bob Graham (D-Fla.)                            Robert W. Kasten Jr. (R-Wis.)

Phil Gramm (R-Texas)                           Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.)

Herbert H. Kohl (D-Wis.)                      Bob Kerrey (D-Neb.)

Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.)                                 John F. Kerry (D-Mass.)

Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.)                     Frank R. Lautenberg (D-N.J.)

James A. McClure (R-Idaho)                  Carl Levin (D-Mich.)

Frank H. Murkowski (R-Alaska)            Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.)

Sam Nunn (D-Ga.)                                Trent Lott (R-Miss.)

David Pryor (D-Ark.)                            Connie Mack (R-Fla.)

William V. Roth Jr. (R-Del.)                  Spark M. Matsunaga (D-Hawaii)

Warren Rudman (R-N.H.)                      John McCain (R-Ariz.)

Terry Sanford (D-N.C.)                                 Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)

Alan K. Simpson (R-Wyo.)                    Howard M. Metzenbaum (D-Ohio)

Ted Stevens (R-Alaska)                                  Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.)

Steven D. Symms (R-Idaho)                  George J. Mitchell (D-Maine)

Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.)                     Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-N.Y.)

Malcolm Wallop (R-Wyo.)                    Don Nickles (R-Okla.)

  Bob Packwood (R-Ore.)

  Claiborne Pell (D-R.I.)

·     Larry Pressler (R-S.D.)

http://www.fourwinds10.net/journals/pdf/J014.pdf