June 12, 2014

PJ 13

CHAPTER 8

 

REC #2 HATONN

 

THURSDAY, MAR. 15, 1990 12:30 P.M. YEAR 3 DAY 211

 

SKULL AND BONES, AMERICA'S SECRET

ESTABLISHMENT

 

In order to adequately give comparison to the plight you are in to­day and that which came upon your world prior to now, you must realize the similarity of the "Order" which is set up to control you by its various facets. I shall quote a portion from a book: AMER­ICA'S SECRET ESTABLISHMENT, An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones.

 

QUOTE:

 

MODUS OPERANDI OF THE ORDER:

 

The activities of The Order are directed towards changing our society, changing the world, to bring about a New World Order. This will be a planned order with heavily restricted individual freedom, without Constitutional protection, without national boundaries or cultural dis­tinction.

 

We deduce this objective by examining and then summing up the actions of individual members: there has been a consistent pattern of activity over one hundred years. Part of this activity has been in cooperation with The Group, with its parallel and recorded objectives.

 

Now if, for example, we found that the dominant interest of members was raising ducks, that they wrote articles about ducks, bred clucks, sold ducks, formed duck-studying councils, developed a philosophy of ducks, then it would be reasonable to conclude that they had an objective concerning ducks, that this is not mere random activity.

 

Historically, operations of The Order have concentrated on society, how to change society in a specific manner towards a specific goal: a New World Order. We know the elements in society that will have to be changed in order to bring about this New World order, we can then examine The Order's actions in this context.

 

More or less these elements would have to be:

 

EDUCATION- how the population will behave,

 

MONEY- the means of holding wealth and exchanging goods,

 

LAW- the authority to enforce the will of the state, a world law and a world court is needed for a world state,

 

POLITICS- the direction of the State,

 

ECONOMY- the creation of wealth,

 

HISTORY- what people believe happened in the past, PSYCHOLOGY - the means of controlling how people think,

 

PHILANTHROPY- so that people think well of the con­trollers,

 

MEDICINE- the power over health, life and death,

 

RELIGION- people's spiritual beliefs, the spur to action for many,

 

MEDIA- what people know and learn about current events,

 

CONTINUITY- the power to appoint who follows in your footsteps.

 

- - - Daniel Coit Gilman, President of Johns Hopkins University, imported Wundt psychological methods from Germany, then welded education and psychology in the U.S., established laboratories, brought these educational laboratories into major Universities and generated hundreds of PhD's to teach the new educational conditioning system. One of the first of these Johns Hopkins doctorates was John Dewey. The result we well know. The educational morass of the '80's where most kids - not all - can't spell, read or write, yet can be programmed into mass behavior channels.

 

The Order's next move was to control the Foundations. They got all the big ones -- Carnegie, Ford, Peabody, Slater, Russell Sage and so on. That's the topic of another volume. As in education, the modus operandi of The Order was to get in FIRST and set the stage for the future. The initial objective was to establish a direction in an organization. Selection of managers, intuitive or amoral enough to catch on to the direction, kept the momentum going. In the case of Foundations, The Order has usually maintained a contin­uing presence over decades.

 

When it comes to activities by individual members, at first sight the pattern is confusing and superficially incon­sistent. Let's give some examples:

 

*  Andrew Carnegie profited from war through his vast steel holdings, but under the guidance of member Daniel Coit Gilman, Carnegie was also an enthusiastic president and financial backer of the American Peace Society. This is seemingly inconsistent. Could Carnegie be for war and peace at the same time?

 

*  The League to Enforce the Peace, founded by members William H. Taft and Theodore Marburg, was promoting peace, yet active in urging U.S. participation in World War One. How could the League be for war and peace at the same time?

 

*  In the 1920s, W. Averell Harriman was a prime sup­porter of the Soviets with finance and diplomatic assistance, at a time when such aid was against State Department regulations. Harriman participated in RUSKOMBANK, the first Soviet commercial bank. Vice-President Max May of Guaranty Trust, dominated by the Harriman-Morgan interests, became the FIRST Vice -President of RUSKOMBANK in charge of its foreign opera­tions. In brief, an American banker under guidance of a member of The Order had a key post in a Soviet bank! But we also find that Averell Harriman, his brother Roland Harriman, and members E.S. James and Knight Woolley, through the Union Bank (in which they held a major interest) were prime financial backers of Hitler.

 

Now our textbooks tell us the Nazis and Soviets were bit­ter enemies and their systems are opposites. How could a rational man support Soviets and Nazis at the same time? Is Harriman irrational or is the inconsistency explainable?

 

* The Bundy family gives us another example of seeming inconsistency. William Bundy was with the Central Intelli­gence Agency for a decade. McGeorge Bundy was National Security Assistant to Presidents Kennedy and Johnson. So the Bundys presumably support U.S.-European policy which is pro-NATO. Yet the Bundys have been linked to activities and organizations which are anti-NATO and, indeed, pro-Marxist --- for example, the Institute for Policy Studies. Are the Bundys inconsistent?

 

* Among individual members of The Order we find a wide variety of publicly proclaimed beliefs, ideologies and politics. William Buckly periodically chews out the Soviets. On the other hand, member John Burtt has been a member of a dozen communist front groups. Member William S. Coffin, Jr. spent three years with CIA and then became a leader of anti-Vietnam war activity through the national Conference for a New Politics and Clergy and Laymen Concerned about Vietnam. In fact, Coffin was one of the Boston Five charged and indicted for conspiracy to violate Federal laws. And, of course, W. Averell Harriman is elder statesman of the Democratic Party.

 

Quite a mixture of beliefs and activities. Do they reflect inconsistent philosophies? How can The Order have a consistent objective with this potpourri of individual ac­tions?

 

The answer is, they are not at all inconsistent: because the objective of The Order is above and beyond these actions and in fact needs these seeming contradictions.

                                                                                           

THE STATE IS ABSOLUTE

 

How can there exist a common objective when members are apparently acting in opposition to one another?

 

Probably the most difficult task in this work will be to get across to the reader what is really an elementary observa­tion: that the objective of The Order is neither "left" nor "right". "Left" and "right" are artificial devices to bring about change, and the extremes of political left and political right are vital elements in a process of controlled change.

 

The answer to this seeming political puzzle lies in Hegelian logic. Remember that both Marx and Hitler, the extremes of "left" and "right" presented as textbook enemies, evolved out of the same philosophical system: Hegelianism. That brings screams of intellectual anguish from Marxists and Nazis, but is well known to any student of political systems.

 

The dialectical process did not originate with Marx as Marxists claim, but with Fichte and Hegel in late 18th and early 19th century Germany. In the dialectical process a clash of opposites brings about a synthesis. For example, a clash of political left and political right brings about another political system, a synthesis of the two, neither left nor right. This conflict of opposites is essential to bring about change. Today this process can be identified in the literature of the Trilateral Commission where "change" is promoted and "conflict management" is termed the means to bring about this change.

 

In the Hegelian system conflict is essential. Furthermore, for Hegel and systems based on Hegel, the State is absolute. The State requires complete obedience from the individual citizen. An individual does not exist for himself in these so-called organix systems but only to perform a role in the operation of the State. He finds freedom only in obedience to the State. There was no freedom in Hitler's Germany, there is no freedom for the individual under Marxism, neither will there be in the New World Order. And if it sounds like George Orwell's 1984 -- it is.

 

In brief, the State is supreme and conflict is used to bring about the ideal society. Individuals find freedom in obedience to the rulers.

 

So who or what is the State? Obviously it's a self-ap­pointed elite. It is interesting that Fichte, who developed these ideas before Hegel, was a freemason, almost certainly Illuminati, and certainly was promoted by the Illuminati. For example, Johann Wolfgang Goethe (Abaris in the Illuminati code) pushed Fichte for an appointment at Jena University.

 

Furthermore, the Illuminati principle that the end justi­fies the means, a principle that Quigley scores as immoral and used by both The Group and The Order, is rooted in Hegel. Even the anonymous Yale student who wrote the verse in Memorandum Three observed this principle at work on the Yale campus.

 

This, then, is a vital part of our explanation of The Or­der. When its co-founder, William Russell, was in Germany in 1831-2, there was no way he could have avoided Hegelian theory and discussion. It was the talk of the campus. It swept intellectual Germany like a Pac Man craze. Most Americans haven't heard of it. And those who have don't want to hear any more about it. Why? Because its assumptions are completely at variance with our sense of individual freedom and Constitutional guarantees. Most of us believe the State exists to serve the individual, not vice versa.

 

The Order believes the opposite to most of us. That is crucial to understanding what they are about. So any discussion between left and right, while essential to promote change, is never allowed to develop into a discussion along the lines of Jeffersonian democracy, i.e., the best gov­ernment is least government. The discussion and the funding is always towards more state power, use of state power and away from individual rights. So it doesn't matter from the viewpoint of The Order whether it is termed left, right, Democratic, Republican, secular or religious -- so long as the discussion is kept within the framework of the State and the power of the State.

 

This is the common feature between the seemingly dissimilar positions taken by members -- they have a higher common objective in which clash of ideas is essential. So long as rights of the individual are not introduced into the discussion the clash of ideas generates the conflict necessary for change.

 

As the objective is a (so global control an emphasis is placed on global thinking, i.e., internationalism. This is done through world organizations and world law. The great contribution of the Tafts to The Order was on the world court system and world law -- to the internationalist aspect of the New World Order.

 

END QUOTE

 

We have previously gone into detail as to how The Order relates to the Council On Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and similar organizations so I will spare the repetition at this time. However---you do remember of course---GEORGE BUSH IS A  MEMBER OF EVERYTHING AND SO ARE HIS CHIEF ADVISORS.  SO BE IT--HOLD IT IN YOUR HEARTS.

 

EMERGENCY BANKING REGULATION

 

As put forth by Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury: in part - --.

 

QUOTE:

 

(a)  As used in this Regulation, the term "banking institution" shall include the following banking and financial institutions: every commercial bank, trust company, private bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, building and loan association, cooperative bank, homestead association, credit union, and United States Postal Savings depository office authorized under the laws of the United States or of any State to transact business in the United States or any place subject to its jurisdiction, or any receiver or conservator for any of the foregoing.

                   

(b)  As used in this Regulation, "operations and functions" shall include the paying Chapter, all Federal Reserve Banks, branches of Federal Reserve Banks, Federal Home Loan in any manner or by any device whatsoever; the receipt or paying out of deposits; the receipt of payments into share or savings accounts or the repurchase of or payments on withdrawals from share or savings accounts; the making of loans or discounts; transfers of credit; the performance of fiduciary, custodial or agency functions; the purchase or sale. (Ed Note: this is an accurate quote.)

 

Section 1. Temporary Curtailment of Operations and Functions. Any Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank, banking institution, or branch may temporarily curtail, place of business separate and apart from the head office of a Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank, or banking institution in which any of its operations and functions are carried out.

 

CHAPTER V: RESTRICTIONS ON CASH

WITHDRAWALS

AND TRANSFERS OF CREDIT

 

Section 1. Cash Withdrawals. (a) Withdrawals in the form of cash whether by the cashing of checks or drafts, the making of loans in cash, or any other form of cash disbursement are prohibited except for those purposes, and not in excess of those amounts, for which cash is customarily used.

 

(b)  Banking institutions are further authorized to restrict and ration cash withdrawals to the extent necessary in the event a sufficient amount of cash should not be available.

 

(c)  Banking institutions shall prohibit withdrawals of cash in any case where there is reason to believe that such with­drawal is sought for the purpose of hoarding.

 

Section 2. Transfers of Credit. (a) No depositor or share or savings account owner may transfer in any manner or by any device whatsoever any balance to his credit on the date on which this Regulation becomes effective, except for the payment of  (i) expenses or reconstruction costs vital to the war effort, (ii) essential living costs, (iii) taxes, (iv) payrolls, or (v) obligations incurred before the date on which this Regulation becomes effective, to the end that the best interests of the war effort and the public will be served.

 

(b) Banking institutions shall prohibit the transfer of credit in any case where there is reason to believe that such transfer is sought for any unauthorized purpose.

 

(c)After this Regulation becomes effective, banking institutions shall retain until released by Federal authority the original or a photographic copy (face and reverse sides) of each check and other evidence of transfer of credit in the amount of $1,000 or more.

 

Section 3. Exceptions to Restrictions. (a) Balances in de­posit or share or savings accounts may be transferred from one banking institution to a deposit or share or savings account of the same owner in another banking institution.

 

(b) The restrictions of Section 2 of this Chapter shall not apply to any check or draft negotiated for value prior to the time this Regulation becomes effective.

 

(c)The limitations and restrictions of this Chapter shall not apply to the United States, any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor to their respective agencies and au­thorities.

 

(d)The limitations and restrictions of this Chapter shall not apply to transactions between Federal Reserve Banks, Federal Home Loan Banks, banking institutions, and branches thereof.

 

(e)The provisions of Section 2 of this Chapter do not alter the right of any banking institution to invoke restrictions on withdrawals or deposits or repurchases of or payments on withdrawals from share or savings accounts provided for under contract or agreement with depositors or share or savings account owners or by reason of law or the provisions of its charter or bylaws.

 

     CHAPTER VI: LENDING AND EXTENDING CREDIT      

 

Section 11 (original printing error). Making Loans and Ex­tending Credit. No banking institution may make any loan, extend any credit, or discount or purchase any obligation or evidence of debt, unless it is established and certified in writing by the borrower and a banking institution that the purpose is to pay expenses or reconstruction costs vital to the war effort, (ii) essential living costs, (iii) taxes, or (iv) payrolls, to the end that the best interests of the war effort and the public will be served.

 

Section 2. Exceptions to Restrictions. (a) The restrictions contained in Section 1 of this Chapter do not prohibit the renewal, recasting, or extension of any loan or credit outstanding prior to the effective date of this Regulation, if in the judgment of the management of the banking institution such action is in the best interest of the war effort. The cancelled original evidence of debt shall be attached to the instrument renewing, recasting, or extending such obligations.

 

(b) Section 1 of this Chapter shall not apply to loans or extensions of credit to the United States, to any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor to their respective agencies and authorities, nor to loans or extensions of credit between banking institutions.

 

     AND SO FORTH - - - - - END QUOTE

 

*******

 

If you are not in a current state of shock, I advise you to go back and read this again because if you are not in a state of shock you either do not understand what you just read or you are out of the banking circles in all manner!!

 

Emergency status is called by the President, who is Mr. Bush, who is a full fledged member of all of the Global 2000 Plan Conspira­tors. It is further advisable to have a war in order to envoke the Regulations and confiscate your money and obviously you have to have the banks under the Regulations in order to tamper with the money.

 

You will also note that the U.S. government, its "rulers" and the States, as well as the cartel banks have no restrictions what-so-­ever!

 

I suggest a rest, Dharma, while everyone goes back and reads to­day s writings, both of them, and get into a state of panic and shock. What is upon your place and coming down, is far beyond any "little grey aliens" under New Mexico in cahoots with anybody!

 

I trust you can see the "fix" you are in as a world citizen, in just this one tiny facet of your life. You have just about been "hamstrung".

 

When we return to the writing we shall get back onto the subject of UFOs at the time of WW-II. Oh blessed children of the lie, I beg of you to open your minds, eyes and cars and let us walk to­gether and not in adversity one against another---you truly do

have enough enemies to your freedom and you can use a little Godly help.   So be it.        I move to stand-by.    Salu.

 

Hatonn to clear.

http://www.fourwinds10.net/journals/pdf/J013.pdf