Feb. 24, 2014

‘CRUCIFIXTION OF THE PHOENIX’ – PHOENIX JOURNAL #12 - CHAPTER  6

REC  #3    SANANDA

THURSDAY, JANUARY 4, 1990   3:00 P.M.   YEAR 3, DAY 141

 

I AM SANANDA.

 

Dharma, you will please relax for I am most capable of handling these slings and arrows.  I don’t believe I ever misled you into thinking there would be none.  I realize that we require you to write and function in ignorance but it is most necessary and worthy indeed.

 

As we come forth with truth, the chaff has to be sorted away and it is for these reasons that I have held up the forwarding of the new formatted documents to press.  There is only one way to fish and that is with bait, my dear.  So be it.

 

This is in response to correspondence sent to GG from one known as JD.  He was most propitious to have sent the inquiries to the source and, therefore, it shall be myself that shall respond.  I am working, of course, under the assump­tion that that was the intent.  I mention “the assumption” for it was not the in­tent at all.  The intent of the corre­spondence was to stop GG and hopefully scare the living daylights out of him.  It will not be effective.  I would herein suggest that you ones all con­tinue to play games long past the time of game-playing.  It is the time of truth and the era of the prophecies and revelations and you are in grave, grave circumstances.

 

I believe it is most obvious that in all instances we have acted in protection of Eduard Meier and I am weary of ones who call them­selves “brothers” causing him more controversy and neg­ative atten­tion.  Of course Billy Meier made er­rors, and errors were made throughout all hu­man doc­uments but the real “users” and perpetra­tors of betrayer behavior shall be flushed out into the truth of openness.

 

In responding it appears the best way to cover all the information is to simply quote the nota­tions and allow for my response.  First, I believe it wise that all of you fully understand who I am for there is obvious lack of knowledge on the part of the writer of the correspon­dence.

 

I AM THE ONE KNOWN AS ESU, “JESUS”, IMMANUEL, EMMANUEL, JM­MANUEL, IISA, EISA, ISA ETC., ETC., ETC., AD NAUSEUM.  MR. D HONORS ME, PERHAPS, BY CITING AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL, I AM SANANDA AS “SANANDA’S VERSION”.  I WOULD MOST SURELY HOPE SO FOR IT IS THE STORY WRITTEN INTO THE SACRED RECORDS OF ONE JUDAS ISCAR­IOTH, MY MOST BELOVED AND FAITHFUL FRIEND WHO WAS BADLY, BADLY USED THROUGH THE CENTURIES OF YOUR TIME IN COUNTING.  YOU SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO TAINT THIS BEAUTEOUS SOUL LONGER.  YOU WILL HEED MY WORDS HEREIN AND YOU HAD BET­TER HEED THEM MOST CAREFULLY IN­DEED.

 

Next, I shall set the record straight as to the writing and any connection with what you refer to as GG’s version of the TALMUD JMMANUEL.  ’TIS YOU, FRIEND JIM, WHO IS MISLED—SORELY.

 

This scribe is exactly that—a scribe. AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL was put to print and a copy of the original intended pub­lication sent to GG long prior to any as­sociation between GG and the scribe.  As a matter of record, Mr. D, it was sent with several manuscripts which were set for publica­tion.  It was compiled and printed for more than six weeks before any contact with Mr. G.

 

On October 16, 1989 a meeting was arranged with Commander Hatonn, this scribe, Oberli and GG in Victorville, California.  At that time G brought a photocopy of his pre­viously handled book (in a simple xerox form) and showed it to the other mentioned parties.

 

NOW, HOWEVER, WE SHALL COME UP WITH SOME REASONABLE ANSWERS FROM YOU ONES WHO CONTINUE TO HOLD THIS IN­FORMATION HOSTAGE IN YOUR GREED AND WARMONGERING.  YOU EITHER DO NOT BELIEVE THE TRUTH OF IT AND WISH TO PRINT IT FOR GAINFUL SPLASH OR YOU ARE DE­LIBERATELY KEEPING TRUTH FROM YOUR FELLOW-MAN WHO IS ABOUT TO SELF-DESTRUCT.  I SHALL TAKE YOUR COMMENTS AND QUES­TIONS ONE FOL­LOWING ANOTHER:

 

JD: Thanks for calling last night.  I am concerned that the entity who is trans­mitting to Dharma is misleading the readers of And They Called His name Im­manuel, I Am Sananda.  I will refer to this as the Sananda version.  So here are four questions from me you may direct to him on this topic.

 

(1) Why are you misleading readers of the Sananda version into thinking that the original sections of its pages 1-7 were spoken by Sananda when they actu­ally come from the Foreword, writ­ten by Ed­uard Meier, to the Talmud Jm­manuel?  Meier is not Sananda.

 

I do not believe that there has ever been any suggestion that Sananda and Meier are the same.  I gave great honor to the writer of the document and made effort to protect him from exactly that which you now do, Mr. D  Is it never enough that a man have his life threatened and live in fear without those who would use his work for their own gain, to continue to place him in jeop­ardy?  The harvest of pain shall be most heavy for some of you who would use your brethren.  It was never for the “UFO” material that Eduard was con­tinually under threat of as­sassination; it was for the truth of the Living Chris­tos.  How dare you again place him in jeop­ardy.  There never seems to be enough blood to be spilled and vampirized to suit the greedy human traitors.  And you, Mr. D, are about to be hung out to dry by the original rip­per-of­fers—that, dear friend, is NOT me.

 

Who has stolen information from whom?  It would appear to me that the documents in ques­tion, and the scrolls from which they were recorded, hap­pen to be MY PROPERTY AND THAT OF JUDAS ISCARIOTH!  HOW DARE YOU TELL ME OF THAT WHICH I MIGHT DO WITH THE TRUTH OF IT.

 

JD: (2)  Why are you transmitting to Dharma the errors that are present in the 1984 English version of the Talmud Jm­manuel once distributed briefly by GG?  Can you not perceive the dif­ference between truth and error?  Follow­ing is an exam­ple:

 

On page 63 of the Sananda version, lines 7-8 from the bottom, an error in the 1984 version is perpetuated.  The sentence, “Herod sent ones forth and had John beheaded while in prison” represents the extraneous verse No. 15:33 oc­curring in the 1984 version.  It is obvious that this verse does not belong there in the English version because in the German version it is a verse with a differ­ent meaning, and because it is the same verse that appears as No. 16:12, a chapter later.  This is a word-proces­sor’s typographical error that you have perpetuated.

Yes, I can perceive the difference between truth and error!  But in some in­stances it was most obvious that other ones involved in the tampering with the original scrolls and transla­tions could not dis­cern truth from LIES.  Errors are acceptable—lies are not!  Is it not past time that man stops interpreting and tampering with divine truth?  Is there no way to stop the lies and expose those who are doing of the tampering except through this manner? 

 

You are angry, Mr. D, for I suggest at this point of this writing, that YOU fully in­tended to publish again, the incorrect version that you refer to as the 1984 version.  Further, I pro­nounce that the only reason you have not done so is that you have been unable to con­summate a “deal” with the holders (unjustly so) of the “rights”.  Well, you cannot afford the price they de­mand for they are unclean of intent and have sorely injured their co-workers in past time and you would not long be spared the hard lesson of that truth.  I believe you will agree that those ones of whom I speak are L.& B.-E.

 

I have never been accused of ignorance nor lack of justice in my discernments.

 

I intentionally brought the document that you call Sananda’s ver­sion to GG because he has been badly used in the past, by the same ones.  He has acted in honor and without mal­ice whereby you might find his brethren have not.

 

JD: (3) Do you think that readers will not eventually learn that you merely transmitted GG’s 1984 English version of the Tal­mud Jmmanuel, al­tering some wording here and there and adding in your own remarks?

 

Whose version?  My dear sir, are you by any chance suggesting that you are contemplating printing as truth some translated scrolls which are untruth?  In your perception are the records valid or are they not?  Truth is truth is truth—is it not?  If Sananda’s ver­sion is a re­flection of the 1984 version which you plan to reprint—is it truth or is it false?  If it be truth and you pro­claim to only desire to bring truth to your fellow-man — why do you pro­claim to have been somehow offended or badly used?

 

These ones here (scribe), know not who you might be as they are not so much as familiar with your name!  When Oberli said he had a let­ter needing re­sponse, to Dharma, her reply was “Who in the world is that?”— I suggest that there is far more to this than just a friendly com­plaint on behalf of my beloved friend, Billy Meier, or a notation regarding a typographi­cal er­ror of no im­portance to “content” what-so-ever.  I further denounce L&B-E for having sorely used and de­prived Billie Meier of his rightful properties and have con­spired to keep him from having his rightful share of abundance.  He has been forced into reclusion and taunted by lies and ridicule almost to the point of to­tal dysfunction and no longer will you of greed get either into his pock­ets nor into the very destruction of his soul peace.

 

I hereby pronounce to all witnesses that one Eduard Meier, “Billy”, shall be given a share of any abundance returned from the disperse­ment of this docu­ment in point.  He shall be re­warded for his planting and you of the grim reapers shall not take of the harvest.  You have sorely mis­judged the loyalty and care given unto man who interacts with the brothers and sis­ters of the Cosmos for they do not take lightly the cost of that participation.  So be it.

 

JD: (4) Can you not perceive that you are setting GG up to be ac­cused of fab­ricating this transmission to Dharma himself?  It will be obvious to many that this transmission stems from G’s 1984 English edition of the Talmud Jm­manuel.  They will know that the Sananda version should have ac­knowledged that Ed­uard Meier’s German version, translated from the Aramaic by the Lebanese ex-priest killed in 1976, is the source from which both the 1984 ver­sion and the Sananda version were derived. 

After GG is discred­ited as having fabricated the Sanandaver­sion, he will be of little further use to you.  Do you want that to happen?

 

Thanks, G  I think both you and the thousands of holders of Meier’s German version of the Talmud Jmmanuel deserve some answers.

 

Why, Mr. D, would GG be accused of anything?  As a matter of fact, he holds a disclaimer of Hold Harmless for any document he brings forth under my au­thorship or that of any of my people.

 

GG was badly, badly used by the group claiming goodness within the group sur­rounding the “Billy Meier materials”.  He in­vested very large sums of money for publication of documents and was then stripped of rights and the resources having ones involved break both their word and their contracts.  Unless, of course, you care to tell me, Mr. D, why GG would pub­lish this doc­ument instead of simply producing the original 1984 ver­sion which you claim to be HIS?

 

For factual reference, we have given Eduard Meier gracious credit through­out all of the PHOENIX JOURNALS.  Man has been like vultures to the car­cass of this contact and it shall no longer be tolerated.

 

There is not even the remotest possibility that GG shall be discredited for any of his works.  I further suggest the tone and insinuation of your term “use him” is most offensive.  We are humbly grateful for his willing participation—again, at great ex­pense to himself personally, to assist us in our efforts to bring truth unto mankind before the time-piece stops.

 

You ones who would reap personal gain and unearned reward at the expense of humankind are to be pitied for you are in no wise wise.  Do you think not that I know of that which my children do?  Your mouth utters words which do not match of your heart place—the lie within is the one that shall destroy.  You are most fortunate in­deed, that GG is a moral and gentle man for you ones are in no wise deserving of such graciousness.

 

I shall leave it to your discretion, G, as to whether or not this is placed in the forepiece of the reformatted material.

 

Oberli, you and Ranos may now finish the formatting, check with G and get the material shipped—quickly please.

 

I trust I have responded with the “deserved” answers.  I have naught further to say unto you who dig and pick; I do have appreci­ation and gratitude unto GG who gives tirelessly unto his brothers—most of whom deserve it not.  It is most grand indeed that judgment comes with Father/Mother’s GRACE for the in­tent of mortal man is vile indeed.  I SHALL NOT BE FUR­THER CRUCI­FIED NOR SHALL MINE PEOPLE LONG CONTINUE TO BE MAR­TYRS!  SO BE IT AND LET THIS WORD GO FORTH FOR I PLACE MINE SEAL UPON IT AS TRUTH AND AS SPOKEN SO SHALL IT COME TO BE FOR I BEAR THE AUTHOR­ITY AND I AM COME AGAIN TO SEE TO MY FLOCKS AND UNTO THE WORD FOR I AM THE WORD!  SO BE IT AND SELAH.

 

Go, Dharma, for these are painful moments and the attacks grow prickly and deeply hurtful.  It is well, precious, for the work must be done.  I bless ye of my beloved chelas for ye are my hands and feet, but I hold thee ones in mine wings.    AU DA PAI DA CUM

 

I AM THE WAY; I AM THE WORD—I AM SANANDA GROWN TO BE ONE WITH OUR FATHER/MOTHER CREATOR AND HUMBLE SERVANT UNTO THE LAWS OF CREATION.  I AM THY BROTHER COME TO BRING YOU HOME.

 

                                    ADONAI,                    ESU SANANDA

http://www.fourwinds10.net/journals/pdf/J012.pdf