FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

‘RETURN OF THE PHOENIX’ – PLEIADES CONNECTION SERIES I – PHOENIX JOURNAL #30 - CHAPTER 11

CREATOR GOD ATON/HATONN

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

‘ RETURN OF THE PHOENIX’ – PLEIADES CONNECTION SERIES I – PHOENIX JOURNAL #30 - CHAPTER  11

REC  #2    HATONN

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1990   9:08 A.M.   YEAR 4 DAY 110

GOLD  IN  THEM  THAR  HILLS!

Just when you could believe in something—like restoration of a greedy, im­moral Sabah family to power in Kuwait, exiled Kuwaitis themselves are not in favor of such a “DEMOCRATIC” AC­TION.  They have been meeting in London—these Kuwaiti exiles of prominent sta­tus and “DO NOT WISH TO SEE THE FORMER RULING FAMILY REIN­STATED”!  Ah, so it goes.

 

By the way, as you were just beginning to believe this “war” inva­sion of Saudi Arabia might hap­pen to be over oil and other misun­derstood rea­sons, now you have to face another blow.  THE SAUDIS HAVE STRUCK IT RICH!  You maybe thought they were already rich?  (sic sic).  In addition to seas of oil—some of which is that nice light crude needing almost no refining—there is an entire mountain of gold which has just been discovered in the southern part of the Kingdom—well, Kingdom come!  Could this possibly partially explain this sudden protec­tive urge in the breast of the Trilateral Commis­sion and the de­ployment of half a million American troops in Saudi Ara­bia?

 

One more little sock-it-toya: One of your own Congressional Reports states that the Agriculture and State Departments approved $5 BIL­LION in tax­payer (you)-guaranteed crop export credits TO IRAQ be­tween 1983 and 1990 despite concerns it could not repay the loans.  The General Ac­counting Office concluded that U.S. desires to build a relationship with that nasty old Saddam and Iraq in days leading up to the Kuwaiti “invasion” outweighed those fears.  Iraq has al­ready defaulted on a $2 BILLION taxpayer-guaranteed loan and cer­tainly has absolutely no inten­tion of repaying this larger one.  Well, you dear “bottomless pockets” don’t object do you?  After all, you can think of the “hostages” eating while you go hungry wondering what happened to all your grain and dairy storage items—AND, YOUR MONEY!

 

EUROPEAN  TRAP

I will herein speak of Europe and possibilities which will also curl you hair even if you are bald as a billiard ball—as I am.

 

President George Bush has fallen into a fine trap—perhaps the greatest trap ever set in history—and this nice little trap was baited by his key in­telligence adviser.  It stems from the transfer of those nice NATO troops, some 200,000, to the Middle East.

 

The two armored divisions and other units being transferred from Ger­many to Saudi Arabia will leave NATO as naked as the plucked turkey at Thanks­giving—and no head to boot!   Europe is wide open to possible at­tack from the formidable armed forces of the Soviet Union—which they will surely do if the above scenario gets too botched to pull off.

 

Now just why do you think no one in the White House seriously con­sidered this obvious danger, thanks to the clever manipulations of the President car­ried out by Robert M. Gates, the deputy director of the Na­tional Security Council (NSC)—A MAN LONG KNOWN IN INTEL­LIGENCE CIRCLES FOR HIS PRONOUNCED PRO-SOVIET BIAS!  Could it pos­sibly be that some ones in your Administration believe they have a seat on the Board of the Global One World Government?  Could you have provided a nice secure ticket for them to be wardens of your U.S. prison?

 

Dr. Gates is the official who briefs the President every morning on the world situation when he is not traveling with his close friend, Secretary of State James A. Baker III, to Moscow, Paris, London and other capitals of Bush’s “New World Order” allies.

 

Why do all these other countries, such as Brazil and Argentina, etc., go along with this world take-over?  BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOTH­ING TO LOSE AND EVERYTHING TO GAIN!

 

Moreover, Brent Scowcroft, director of the NSC, has left the day-to-day oper­ations of the White House intelligence center squarely in Gate’s hands; not that it matters in the least for Scowcroft is a part of the inside planners, along with Mr. Eagleburger.  On top of that, Gates chairs the powerful “Deputies Committee” comprised of his counterparts from the Pentagon, CIA, Mossad and other secu­rity agencies.

 

CONTROL  FLOW  TO  PRESIDENT

 

In short, Gates controls the flow of intelligence to the President as well as to the Department of State and to key Cabinet-level of­ficials—a nice slot for a devout Communist Zionist, don’t you think?

 

It certainly should come as no surprise to insiders who have been watch­ing Gates for years that the Soviet threat is now almost to­tally ignored by the Bush administration.  The fact that the Red Army is not only still to­tally intact but far stronger than it has ever been before Gorbachev as­cended to power is quietly and simply brushed aside.

 

Indeed, the most salient security factor of your time, i.e., that ONLY THE SOVIET UNION HAS THE STRATEGIC CAPABILITY TO UT­TERLY DE­STROY THE U.S., IS NOW DEEMED TO BE OF NO CONSE­QUENCE IN THE RARI­FIED “ONE-WORLD” ATMO­SPHERE PRE­VAILING IN THE WHITE HOUSE.  This is obviously the view of the whole Pentagon as well.

 

The evidence that Saddam Hussein would never have invaded Kuwait without at least a green light from the Soviets is underwhelming, to say the least.  Yet under Gate’s guidance the fact that Iraq got four-fifths of its arms from the USSR and couldn’t move its 5,000 Soviet tanks and other materiel without as­surance the spare parts would keep coming from the Soviet Union, is thought to be irrele­vant in the Oval Office.

 

Also brushed off by Bush and Gates are the thousands of Soviet mil­itary ad­visers in Iraq who are guiding the Iraqi army’s every move and man­ning the deadliest high-tech weapons systems.

 

Most dangerous of all the USSR’s heavy contributions to Iraqi mili­tary might is the SS-12, a mis­sile capable of firing both nuclear and poison gas warheads up to a thousand miles with deadly pin-point accuracy.  Under the Intermedi­ate Nuclear Forces “Treaty” signed by the United States and the USSR in 1987, the SS-12 was banned from the face of the Earth—how quaint.

 

However, this highly accurate weapons system has since popped up in large numbers in Poland, Czechoslovakia and other East European coun­tries and is now reportedly deployed in Iraq.  In­deed, the SS-12 was planted solidly in Iraq prior to 1988 when the war with Iran ended.

 

Although the Defense Intelligence Agency notified the White House of the persistent reports of this SS-12 capability in Iraq, Bush, Gates and their trained seals in the CIA are looking the op­posite way at this dangerous devel­opment.

 

Bush has now doubled the size of the American forces in the Middle East while espousing that the Soviets are our blood-brothers having “changed their leopard spots”.  The Soviets are now your beholden “friends and al­lies”.  It would appear to me that there is great suffering from acute my­opia induced by Gates, Baker, etc., etc., etc.  The President seems to perceive abso­lutely no danger to Eu­rope what-so-ever—how could this be?  Could it be that he is con­sumed by his ethereal vision of the New World Order?  Or, does he know more than you know and it isn’t a “vision” problem at all!  The world is set for total take-over—BUT, THE PRIME MOVERS AND SHAKERS HAVEN’T TOTALLY SHAKEN EACH OTHER DOWN,  YET!!

VISION!

 

Blind?  Mr. Bush blind?  I seriously doubt that, dear ones.  But, has no one dared point out to Bush that it was this same insane vi­sion that broke the presidency of Woodrow Wilson as he played into the hands of the Bolsheviks then taking over Russia?

 

Is there no one on Bush’s staff who can remember that this identi­cal vi­sion of a world ruled by the United Nations led Franklin Roo­sevelt, then under the influence of Alger Hiss and other pro-Sovi­ets, down the prim­rose path to Yalta and the surrender of Eastern Europe and eventu­ally mainland China to communism?

 

With more than half a million Americans in the Saudi desert and on their way from Europe, this has the makings of a mammoth trap—per­haps a BEAR TRAP?

WHAT  IF  THE  BATTLE  HAPPENS?

 

If Bush commits these forces to battle, as now would seem totally likely, what would prevent the Soviet army from moving right through their ally, Germany and France, to the English Channel in the “10 days” Gen. Nikolai Ogarkov al­lotted in the master plan drawn up in the mid-1980’s and still preached in So­viet military circles?  Oh son-of-a gun, you didn’t know about THAT plan?

 

So be it, the answer, of course, is NOTHING!

 

Let us look a bit more closely at this man, Gates.

 

He is a consummate con man and has gulled Bush as completely as he did his late boss CIA Di­rector W. Casey and, through Casey, Presi­dent R. Reagan.

 

By simply telling them what they want to hear and constantly leak­ing pre­pared stories to the press, Gates has persuaded both conser­vative and lib­eral columnists he is a “hard-liner” adamantly op­posed to the Soviets and suspi­cious of glasnost.

 

But the quality of the “intelligence” Bush now receives on a daily basis from Gates may be better judged by several tidbits in the closely held dossier sev­eral officials have been keeping on Gates.

 

As CIA’s deputy director for intelligence, Gates helped sell Casey and Reagan on Israel’s wacky plan to exchange U.S. arms with Iran for the release of American hostages in Lebanon—the nutty idea that tempted Reagan to tiptoe into the Iran-”contra” morass.

 

Just before becoming Casey’s No. 1 deputy on April 18, 1986, Gates leaked two top-secret intel­ligence estimates to the Washington Post.  The first was aimed at helping the liberal Democrats in Congress to drastically cut the Rea­gan defense budget; the second tried to shoot down, and es­sentially succeeded in shooting down, Reagan’s strategic defense initiative (SDI), commonly called “Star Wars”.  As reported by the Post  on March 31, 1986, the first esti­mate claimed that So­viet military spending had been “almost flat for a decade” and might even “decline during the next five years”.

 

Of all the fiction fed to your presidents in weird “national intel­ligence esti­mates” over the years, this particular concoction of Gates must take the prize.  Indeed, all the evidence, then as now, proved conclusively that the USSR had been engaged in the greatest military buildup in history—a buildup that omi­nously continues to this very day.  The second blast from Gates less than a week later was intended to cripple SDI.  This “intelligence” estimate claimed the Soviets had NOT violated the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty.  But three years later the Soviets them­selves freely admit­ted they HAD violated the ABM agreement, just as they have violated nearly 200 other solemn agreements made with the U.S. and the West.

 

U.S. deployment of SDI hangs on the issue of observance of the ABM Treaty.  Gates’ target in trying to defend Soviet claims that they were not in violation is certainly obvious.  Tragically, he scored a perfect bull’s-eye.

 

In fact, this single leak from Gates’ fiction factory at CIA cast such doubt on Pentagon reports of Soviet ABM violations that many consider this the major reason America still has no viable defense against Soviet ICBM’s or the short-range missiles poised aboard the Soviet submarines lying in wait off both your East and West coasts—a combined force capable of killing every man, woman and child in the U.S. in a matter of mere min­utes.  As you might have guessed by this point, Gates has served both the KGB and the Mossad.  Further, it was Gates, behind the scenes, who led the fight waged in favor of permitting your NATO allies to accept the So­viet oil and natural gas pipelines to Western Eu­rope.  Now completed, except for one strand, the pipelines tie the economies of France, Germany and a half-dozen other, smaller European countries to the Soviet Union like an umbilical cord.

 

Gate’s many coups on behalf of the Soviets began when he joined the CIA in 1966, fresh out of Indiana University, where he had picked up an MA in his­tory after being at William & Mary.  In 1974 he got his Ph.D. in Russian and Soviet history from Georgetown University while working at the CIA.  And in the same year (1974) Gates trans­ferred to the staff of the NSC, then under the iron thumb of none other than the Great Detentist, HENRY KISSINGER!

MENTOR  KISSINGER

 

Kissinger became Gate’s mentor.  The younger man did his job at the NSC so well as Presidents Nixon and Ford cozied up to Brezhnev that he was kept on at the NSC by Jimmy Carter.  In January, 1980 he went back to the CIA as the national intelligence officer on the Soviet Union and two years later he was appointed CIA deputy direc­tor for intelligence in charge of all the national in­telligence es­timates prepared for the President.

 

A short, husky, boyish-looking operator, Gates has made a whole ca­reer out of ingratiating him­self with the older men who have been his superi­ors.  He completely mesmerized Bill Casey, who came to look upon Gates as his son.

 

Gates fed Casey the anti-Soviet hard- line the CIA director thrived on.  In the spring of 1986 Gates was promoted to the powerful post of overall deputy di­rector of the CIA.

 

When Casey’s health collapsed after the Iran-contra scandal broke, Rea­gan nominated Gates to be the new director of CIA.  The liberals rejoiced and the Post and the New York Times hailed Gates appoint­ment.

 

With powerful Democratic senators backing him, Gates’ confirmation ap­peared assured.  But several conservative Republicans on the Sen­ate Intelli­gence Committee were given the file on Gates.  Almost overnight, support for Gates moving up to director of the CIA caved in, and Reagan was persuaded to withdraw the nomination—however, no publicity was released of nega­tive nature and the subject was instantly hushed.

 

Gates was kept on as deputy director.  William Webster, who had been ap­pointed by Jimmy Carter to head the FBI, was named director of the agency, and he apparently was as completely taken in by Gates as Casey before him.

 

When Bush became President he picked Scowcroft to head the NSC, a post that required Sen­ate confirmation.  Gates was named deputy di­rector of the NSC, a job that sidestepped the painful confirmation process in the Senate which had so recently thwarted Gates’ promo­tion to the top post at the CIA.

 

In the Bush White House, Gates has presided over the accelerated disarma­ment of U.S. and NATO forces.  The conventional arms treaty which was signed in Paris on November 19 is Gates’ biggest coup to date.

 

Thus, now having helped strip NATO naked, Gates is free to concen­trate on steering Bush into the Middle East trap.

 

If the Soviets do make their move in Europe when the huge U.S. force is nailed down in the Iraqi desert, Gates may well go down in history as the rook that helped the Soviet Union checkmate the United States of America.  So be it for one little Robert M. Gates—ah, the web is tangled indeed!

PRIVACY  ALERT

 

In case you haven’t noticed, you ones who feel safe and private in paying with money orders—beware!  “NO INDIVIDUAL POSTAL CUSTOMER MAY PUR­CHASE MONEY ORDERS IN EX­CESS OF $10,000 IN FACE VALUES ON ANY ONE DAY”.  THERE ARE NO EXCEP­TIONS TO THIS RULE.  This is, of course, from the U.S. Postal Ser­vice’s Domestic Mail Manual.  Please be alert and act accordingly if you buy your money orders down at the good old Post Office—Big Brother is WATCHING!  This means exactly what it says—you cannot, for instance, buy $10,000 worth in the morning and $6,000 in the af­ternoon—IT MEANS IN ANY ONE DAY.

 

Here is a post-script regarding the subject above regarding a cut­ting of re­quired bank reserves.  The following notice was received by a business col­league of our publisher who had shared it with him this day — it has just now been brought to the scribe to be shared with you:  “Bulletin: Fed cuts some bank reserve require­ments.  Reserve required for some cate­gories to be cut to ZEROFed says reserve cut responds to tighter bank lending—”

 

And you thought nothing happened on December 3rd, 1990.

 

I would like to leave you with a thought this day:  He who pas­sively ac­cepts evil is as much in­volved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.  He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it—where might you fit?

 

Hatonn to stand-by.  Salu and good-day.

 

June 25, 2011

http://fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J030.pdf