‘RETURN OF THE PHOENIX’ – PLEIADES CONNECTION SERIES I – PHOENIX JOURNAL #30 – ‘THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED NATIONS’ - CHAPTER  9

REC  #2    HATONN

SUNDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1990   9:06 A.M.   YEAR 4 DAY 108

 

Chapter II provides for participation in UNIDO.  Membership is open to all States members of the United Nations or a specialized agency.  Article 6 pro­vides for withdrawal from membership, not possible now without withdrawing from the United Nations, subject to providing a reason­able period of notice.  The right of withdraw­ing from UNIDO alone may pro­vide useful lever­age, al­though actual withdrawal would entail a difficult decision.

 

Chapter III establishes the organs of UNIDO.  Article 8 specifies a Gen­eral Conference com­posed of all members which will act upon the reports of the Board and the Director-General and determine the guiding princi­ples and policies of the organization.  Article 9 provides for the Board to be composed of 53 members elected by the Conference, with the follow­ing distribution of seats: 33 members elected from the G-77 (developing countries), 15 members elected from Group B (industralized democracies) and 5 members elected from Group D (the Soviet bloc).  Article 10 estab­lishes a Programme and Budget Committee to consist of 27 members elected by the Conference with the following distribution: 15 from the G-77, 9 from Group B, and 3 from Group D.

 

Chapter IV delineates the process for approval of the program of work and the regular budget (i.e., the budget expenditures to be met from as­sessed con­tributions) and the operational budget (i.e., budget expenditures to be met from voluntary contributions).  Arti­cle 14 stipulates that the Di­rector-General shall prepare and sub­mit a draft work program, regular budget and opera­tional budget to the Board through the Committee.  The Committee will con­sider the Director-General’s proposals and make rec­ommendations to the Board by a two-thirds majority vote of those present and voting.  The Board will examine the Director General’s proposals and the recom­mendation of the Committee and adopt the program of work, regular budget and opera­tional budget, for submission to the Conference, by a two-thirds majority of those present and voting.  The Conference will approve the submission of the Board by a two-thirds majority vote of those present and voting.  The Conference may make no deci­sion or amendment involving expenditures unless the Committee and the Board have had an opportunity to act as indicated above.  By commanding more than a third of the votes in the Board and the Com­mittee, the major donor States (i.e., Groups B and I), which share a common desire to keep United Nations agency budgets to a reason­able level, will be able to block work programs and budgets of which they disapprove, if they act to­gether.

 

Article 15 provides that the scale of assessments for members shall be estab­lished by the Con­ference by a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting, upon a recommendation of the Board adopted by a two-thirds major­ity of the members present and voting.  The Board’s rec­ommendation is to be based on a draft prepared by the Committee.  The Constitution thereby pro­vides a mechanism for the major donors as a group to veto a scale of assess­ments which they disapprove.  Article 15 also stipulates that the scale of as­sessments shall be based to the extent possible on the scale most recently em­ployed by the United Nations and no member shall be as­sessed more than 25 percent of the regular budget.

 

Chapter VI covers legal matters.  Article 23 provides for amend­ments, with special, stringent provisions for amendments to finan­cial articles.  Financial amendments must be approved by two-thirds majorities of the Board and Conference respectively and must be ratified by three-fourths of the Members States.  This provision protects the blocking more than a third of the votes which major donors command in the Committee and the Board.

**(H: Remember what I told you—on the UN level, countries of the world are called UN’s “states”.)**

 

Article 25 stipulates that the Constitution shall enter into force when at least eighty States that deposited instruments of ratifica­tion notify the Sec­retary General of the United Nations that they have agreed, after consul­tations among themsleves, that the Consti­tution shall enter into force.  However, for States that had de­posited instruments of ratification but did not participate in such notification, the Constitution shall come into force on such later date as they choose.

 

The practical effect of the entry into force provisions is that the Constitu­tion will not enter into force without the agreement and participation of major donors, including the United States.  Once the Senate has given its advice and consent to ratification, this provision will afford the United States a strong po­sition to ensure that the basic concerns of the United States, such as bud­getary re­straint, are taken into account.  ***(H: Oh sure!  And who else is going to be sick besides ME?)***

 

Article 27 states that no reservations may be made to the Constitu­tion.

 

A major problem in the constitutional negotiations was to balance the de­sire of major con­tributing countries for control over the regular budget with the insistence by developing coun­tries that funding for technical as­sistance activi­ties continue to be avail­able on an assured basis.  Under current arrange­ments, a portion of UNIDO’s activities in the field of technical assistance is fi­nanced by assessments from the regular budget of the United Nations.  Un­der Annex II of the Constitution, 6% of the regu­lar budget of UNIDO will be set aside for technical assistance activities  which have heretofore been financed by assessed contributions to the United Nations budget.  The six percent fig­ure sets a constitutional ceil­ing on the portion of the new organiza­tion’s regu­lar budget which can be de­voted to technical assistance.  All other technical assis­tance activities must be financed by voluntary contributions.  Since the United States together with the other major contributing countries will have more than a third of the votes in the Board, which must approve the regular budget by a two-thirds majority vote, we will have sub­stantial influence on the overall fig­ure with regard to which the 6% techincal assistance figure will be calcu­lated and, therefore, over the absolute amount of technical assis­tance ex­penditures from the regular budget.

 

The combined effect of the 6 percent ceiling, the major donors hav­ing more than a blocking third of the votes, and the withdrawal pro­visions will provide the United States with much greater ca­pacity than presently exists to ensure that regular budget funds for tech­nical assistance are used for programs which we believe should qualify for such funding.  In this connection, the United States representative to the Constitutional Confer­ence placed on the record our view that tech­nical assistance financed by assessments, “must fill gaps which would be difficult for the UNDP, with its country specific focus, or other voluntary funds to fill.  Specifi­cally, such technical assis­tance would deal with emergency situa­tions and finan­cial activities that primarily benefit the en­tire international community, not a single country.”

 

There has been growing recognition in UNIDO of the need to achieve a true consensus on de­velopment questions if UNIDO is to cope ef­fectively with de­velopment problems.  At the same time, there has been growing recognition within the United States of the need for the United Nations to be more re­sponsive to our basic programmatic and budgetary concerns, especially in light of the large United States assessed contributions.  The Constitution of UNIDO is a prod­uct of both of these movements.  It gives an already existing institution a new mechanism of de­cision-making which provides spe­cial recognition of the essential role of major contributors, in­cluding the United States.  In this way, it is truly a precedent setting doc­ument for the United Na­tions system which deserves our earnest and rapid support.

 

The other agencies most concerned, the Department of Labor, the Agency for International Development, and the Department of Com­merce, have no ob­jection to ratification of the Con­stitution.  I hope that you will ask the Senate to consider the Constitution and give its advice and consent to ratification as soon as possible.

 

Respectfully submitted,

William Clark.

 

Let us herein repeat the

 

PREAMBLE

 

CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED NATIONS

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION

 

The States parties to this Constitution,

In conformity with the Charter of the United Nations,

Bearing in mind the broad objectives in the resolutions adopted by the sixth special session of the General Assembly of the United Na­tions on the estab­lishment of a New International Eco­nomic Order, in the UNIDO Second General Conference’s Lima Declaration and Plan of Ac­tion for Industrial De­velopment and Co-operation, and in the resolution of the seventh special ses­sion of the General Assembly of the United nations on Development and In­ternational Eco­nomic Co­operation,

 

Declaring that:

It is necessary to establish a just and equitable economic and so­cial order to be achieved through the elimination of inequalities, the establishment of ra­tional and equitable international eco­nomic relations, implementation of dy­namic social and economic  changes and the encourgae­ment of neces­sary structural changes in the devel­opment of the world economy.

 

***(H: Regional Government is a component of the structural changes.)***

 

Industrialization is a dynamic instrument of growth essential to rapid eco­nomic and social devel­opment, in particular of developing countries, to the improvement of the living standards and the qual­ity of life of the peo­ples in all countries, and to the introduc­tion of an  equitable eco­nomic and social order.

 

It is the sovereign right of all countries to achieve their indus­trialization, and any process of such industrialization must con­form to the broad ob­jectives of self-sustaining and integrated so­cio-economic development, and should in­clude the appropriate changes which would ensure the just and effective par­ticipation of all peoples in the industrialization of their coun­tries.

 

As international co-operation for development is the shared goal and com­mon obligation of all countries it is essential to promote industrialization through all possible concerted measures in­cluding the development, trans­fer and adaptation of technology on global, regional and national, as well as on sectoral levels.

 

All countries, irrespective of their social and economic systems, are deter­mined to promote the common welfare of their peoples by individual and collective actions aimed at expanding inter­national economic co-operation on the basis of sovereign equality, strength­ening of the eco­nomic inde­pendence of the developing countries, se­curing their equitable share in total world in­dustrial production and contributing to international peace and security and the pros­perity of all nations, in conformity with the pur­poses and princi­ples of the Charter of the United Nations.

 

Mindful of these guidelines,

Desiring to establish, within the terms of Chapter IX of the Char­ter of the United Nations, a specialized agency to be known as the United Nations In­dustrial Development Organization (UNIDO) (hereinafter referred to as the “Organization”), which shall play the central role in and be responsi­ble for re­viewing and promoting the co-ordination of all activities of the United Nations system in the field of industrial development, in confor­mity with the respon­siblities of the Economic and Social Council under the Charter of the United Nations and with the appli­cable relationship agreements,

 

Hereby agree to the present Constitution.

 

***(H: By any label, this means “sharing the wealth.

 

I see no alternative other than to pursue this subject in this man­ner.  Re­gional Government is a component of the structural changes.  Futher, you may not know it but in 1945 the U.N. Charter was pro­claimed law of the land!

 

Oh, no belief herein?)***

 

CHAPTER I.—OBJECTIVES AND FUNCTIONS

 

ARTICLE 1

OBJECTIVES

 

The primary objective of the Organization shall be the promotion and accler­ation of industrial development in the developing coun­tries with a view to as­sisting in the establishment of a new inter­nationl economic or­der. The Orga­nization shall also promote indus­trial development and co-operation on global, regional and na­tional, as well as on sectoral levels.  And so it goes - - - -.

 

NEW WORLD ORDER

 

Treaty #97-19 IS A CONSTITUTION.  This constitution is only one of many constitutions that the United Nations has “in force” upon the United States, causing your once free people to be merged with the communist nations of the world.  This is the basis upon which Pres­ident George Bush and the U.S. State Department hinge their author­ity for converting the United States sys­tem of government from a Constitutional Republic into a segment of the in­ternational social­ist world government: THE NEW WORLD ORDER!

 

When asked about “Constitutionality of that which he is doing”, Mr. Bush smiled to the press and all the world and said, “I know all of my rights within the Constitution; I also know what Presidents be­fore me have done and .....”  This speech was given only two days ago just after ringing the death knell of your “Liberty Bell”!

 

The treaty discussed herein is in force, right now, world-wide, having been en­acted on behalf of the American People, who not only DO NOT KNOW that this treaty exists, much less the seri­ous changes that it makes in your lives as the treaty helps overthrow the United States Constitu­tion.  Consent of the governed has never been granted to permit such destruc­tive treaties and changes nor will it be easy and probable that you can change of it.

 

Some two centuries ago your forefathers engineered the best form of gov­ernment that could ever be created by man as it conforms to the natural law, places limits on the power that man can exercise over his fellow man, and safeguards your natural rights, which come as an endow­ment from the Cre­ator.  By the way, this also includes the right of the people to keep and bear arms—which is also being re­moved from you.

 

The P.P.B.S. (Program, Planning, and Budgeting System) which plays an ac­tive part in this sce­nario, is an accounting system but NOT an ordinary ac­counting system.  It is a computerized command and con­trol system, based upon predetermined goals and objectives.  It is in operation in the United States in order to socialize the Ameri­can people and their govern­ment in all the economic, social and po­litical aspects of human endeavor.  Government funding is granted only when recipients comply to given management perfor­mance.

 

RECOURSES?  Yes, fortunately there are—I wonder if you will take ac­tion?  There is a princi­ple in international law by which treaties can be nullified: Re­bus Sic Stantibus.  If you fail to stand against these intrusion to your sovereignty, your indepen­dence, your right to keep and bear arms, then you, as individuals, as a state, and as a nation, are ruined!

 

IMPORTANT!   IMPORTANT!   IMPORTANT!

 

Along with the other information, take this to your State Represen­tatives.  It is probable that he is not versed in INTERNATIONAL LAW and will not know how to proceed to nullify these disastrous treaties which are the reason why your guns, etc., are being taken away from you, as well as giving of your armed forces into a commu­nist United Nations under a permanent ar­rangement.

 

Tell him/her that there is ample reason to void the disarmament law, and the INF treaty which has already been signed.  You can stop the addi­tional and worse treaties which the state de­partment and the president have already worked out for you, by knowing how to proceed.

 

Your Representative will find the PREMIER PRINCIPLE of Interna­tional Law in Black’s Law Dictionary.  The page number, definition and documenta­tion are reproduced below.  IT IS THE HIGHEST REASON IN RANK FOR VOIDING A TREATY.  THE PRINCIPLE IS CALLED:

 

REBUS  SIC  STANTIBUS

IT MEANS THAT “THE SITUATION HAS CHANGED”.  THIS SET OF PAPERS HAS BEEN GIVEN TO DOCUMENT WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING TO THE UNITED STATES AND TO GIVE YOU PRINCI­PLES IN LAW WHICH WILL ASSIST YOU TO PROCEEED TO AR­REST THE EVIL!

 

Blacks Law Dictionary: REBUS SIC STANTIBUS:  On Page 1432 it gives the definition as fol­lows: At this point of affairs; in these cir­cumstances.  A name given to tacit conditions.  Said to attach to all treaties, that they should cease to be obligatory, so soon as the state of facts and conditions upon which they were founded has substantially changed.

 

Documentation:

 

Taylor International Law, Section 394; I Oppenheim International Law, Sec­tion 550; Gotius, Chapter XVI, Section XXV.

 

What your Representative needs to know is that there is more to the treaties than what meets the eye....more than the states and citi­zens are aware.  The people have been lied to about the “peace” program.  They were not told that it meant giving away their armed forces and their own personal firearms.  The true nature of the treaties was denied them.  They were not told that the Na­tional Se­curity and the security of the 50 states would be endangered.  They were not told that they were being restruc­tured for world govern­ment under a communist set of operating docu­ments.  Now that they know the truth the sit­uation has changed!  This knowledge is grounds for nullification of the treaties.  It is the Duty of the States to see that the Constitution is enforced as well as the Bill of Rights.  It takes ONLY ONE STATE TO FORCE THE SUPREME COURT TO RULE ON THE ISSUE.  IF THE RULING COMES DOWN UN­FAVORABLE, THE ONLY RECOURSE IS TO RE­PEAL.  TO RE­PEAL TAKES THRITY-EIGHT (38) STATES TO OVER­RIDE THE SUPREME COURT.  IF THE ATTEMPT IS NOT MADE, YOUR GOV­ERNMENT IS IRRETRIEVABLY GONE!  WHEN THE SEC­OND AMENDMENT GOES, ALL OF THE AMENDMENTS WILL GO BE­CAUSE IT IS THE KEYSTONE AMENDMENT.  THIS IN­CLUDES THE RIGHT TO OWN LAND AND TO VOTE FOR ELECTED REPRE­SENTATIVES.  ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES WILL FIND THEMSELVES IN CON­FLICT WITH THE MILITARY GOVERN­MENT THAT WILL SUPERSEDE THEM!  THE USE OF DUAL-SPEAK, (ALSO CALLED DUAL-USE) SOPHISTRY AND LEGER DE­MAIN STRATE­GIES WERE APPLIED TO FOOL THE PEOPLE INTO INACTION.  THE PEOPLE ARE THE ULTIMATE POWER.  THE EVIL BEING DONE IS WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED.  YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT WAS WRIT­TEN IN PERPETU­ITY AND WHAT THE FEDERAL GOV­ERNMENT IS DOING IS AGAINST THE LAW.  THE UNITED NA­TIONS CHARTER WAS SLAPPED ONTO YOUR COUNTRY AS A “TREATY”, ALSO!  SINCE IT IS CAUSING ALL THE DAMAGE, IT SHOULD BE GOTTEN RID OF, ALSO, BY  REBUS SIC STAN­TIBUS!!!

 

Chela, you need a break and this is probably mind-shattering enough to cause need for digestion assistants.  The clock is running out for you pre­cious chil­dren of the lie—the ones in charge of your nations know exactly that which they do.  IF YOU DO NOT ACT TO COUNTER THIS THING, YOU WILL SIMPLY BE ABSORBED AND THE GAME FIN­ISHED!  SO BE IT.  MAY GOD WALK WITH YOU FOR YOU HAVE LOST YOUR WAY.  SALU.

 

Hatonn to clear and move to stand-by.  Saalome’

 

http://fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J030.pdf

 

June 20, 2011