‘RETURN OF THE PHOENIX’ – PLEIADES CONNECTION SEREIS I – PHOENIX JOURNAL #30 - CHAPTER  8

REC  #1    HATONN

SUNDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1990   6:51 A.M.   YEAR 4 DAY 108

TODAY’S  WATCH

 

You must always look beyond that which is obvious and unto that which is truth in reality.  You are within the time of the great deceiving and very little is that which is portrayed for your con­sumption and the disease of deceit is now throughout your world.

 

You flood me with questions—you actually pray for disaster to strike to prove something or an­other.  I shall take today’s watch to ask you ques­tions and perhaps in the answering within you will find better under­standing.

ROCKET  LAUNCHES

 

There have been at least five (FIVE) (5) major rocket launches on the planet within the past ten hours.  China, Israel, Iraq, Soviet Union and the U.S.  Do you actually think they are sepa­rate and apart one from the other?  Do you actually think you are placing scopes in the cosmos to look at the migration habits of stars?  How is it that Japan is accompany­ing the Soviets to the space station?  How is it Iraq would launch a rocket at the exact same time?  Can you not feel the death knot about your necks?

 

How is it that in the Israel area whole busloads of people are slashed and then hit with assault weapons fire?  How is it that bombing raids by Is­raelis con­tinue into Lebanon with not hardly passing interest or mention?

 

How is it that the Israelis are gathering “Jews” from every part of the world in a fi­nal frantic thrust to “gather ALL Jews home?”  Jews from Ethiopia are being gath­ered even against their will and yet the gathering goes on in frantic measure—how can tiny Israel house and feed the hundreds of thousands of people they are gather­ing?  They now have gotten some 28,000 (reported) Jews into Israel from Russia and some 20,000 are expected from Ethiopia alone.  The Israelis say: “No expense will be spared to gather our people home.”  Who pays that “No expense spared”?  You in America already give Israel straight across the board with no strings at­tached and the best investment programs available, over 4 BILLION DOLLARS a year—in cash!  What chance do you think little Palestine and Lebanon have in sustaining their nations?  Every­thing is being set up to simply allot them to Israel through the United Nations as soon as the radioactive dust settles in the Middle East.

 

Will you have earthquakes?  Oh, indeed you shall.  On Dec. 3rd?  Who cares?  If you are in preparation, you have naught to concern about and if you are not—you will have to face it one day so what difference does it make to those who will not prepare under any circumstance?  Oh, but you say, you ones and Earth ones are always predicting and it happens not—so we aren’t go­ing to “bite” again!  So be it!  What if it does??  Will you then say “Why didn’t you tell us?”  No-one comes out and tells you, “THERE WILL BE A QUAKE AT SUCH AND SUCH A TIME AT SUCH AND SUCH A PLACE”—you of the “hearing” public place the word “will” onto the predictions which have said, “I see a very good probability/possibility of a quake on such and such a given time frame in such and such a place.”

 

I can promise you, however, that if the U.S. does what it hopes to do—there will be immediate retalia­tion in the form of earthquakes and all manners of things.  This very day the “Siberian Express” will be moved within the boundaries of the U.S.  There will also be further flooding of the Northwest—and CHINA is mobilizing!

 

* * * * *

 

WHAT OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER AND HOW COULD THIS COME ABOUT?  WELL, IN 1983 YOUR THEN PRESIDENT ENTITY RONALD REA­GAN FINALIZED A DOCU­MENT INTO LAW AND CONGRESS RATIFIED IT.  IT IS THE TREATY WHICH AU­THORIZED PRESIDENT ENTITY GEORGE BUSH TO ESTABLISH A “NEW WORLD OR­DER”.  UNLAW­FULLY BUT LEGALLY!  IT IS HEADED ON THE COVER PAGE BY THE FOLLOWING: CON­STITUTION OF THE UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVEL­OPMENT ORGANIZATION.  (Please note the word “CONSTITUTION”.)THEN:MES­SAGE from THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED NATIONS’ INDUSTRIAL DEVEL­OPMENT ORGANI­ZATION (UNIDO), ADOPTED BY THE UNITED NA­TIONS CON­FERENCE ON THE ES­TABLISHMENT OF THE UNITED NATIONS INDUS­TRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZA­TION AS A SPECIAL­IZED AGENCY ON APRIL 8, 1979, AND SIGNED ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON JANUARY 17, 1980.

 

OCTOBER 5, 1981.—TREATY WAS READ THE FIRST TIME AND, TO­GETHER WITH THE ACCOMPANYING PAPERS, REFERRED TO THE  COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RE­LATIONSAND ORDERED TO BE PRINTED FOR THE USE OF THE SENATE.  97th Congress, 1st Ses­sion, SENATE, Treaty Doc. No. 97-19, U.S. Govern­ment Print­ing Office, Washington: 1981, form 89-118 0.

 

On the UN level, countries of the world are called UN’s “states”.  This was ratified by the U.S. Senate and signed by the President of the U.S.  It was signed by 80 other countries and ratified; this Constitution, and it is now in force world-wide!  DO YOU RECALL GIVING YOUR PUBLIC OFFICIALS POWER TO DO SUCH A THING?

 

Dear ones, this CONSTITUTION of the United Nations Industrial De­velopment Organization—UNIDO—is used as authority to set up this New World Order and it is now acting as official law even though you know nothing of it.

 

THE ABUSE OF TREATY POWER ALLOWS THIS “CONSTITUTION” TO SU­PERSEDE THE UNITED STATES CON­STITUTION.  Is it too late?

 

A New Social Order:“The States Parties to this Constitution,

 

In conformity with the Charter of the United Nations,

Bearing in mind the broad objectives in the resolutions adopted by the sixth special session of the General Assembly of the United Na­tions on the estab­lishment of a New International Eco­nomic Order, in the UNIDO Second Gen­eral Conference’s Lima Declaration and Plan of Action for Industrial Devel­opment and Co-operation, and in the resolution of the seventh special ses­sion of the General Assembly of the United Nations on Development and Interna­tional Eco­nomic Co­operation.

 

Now, let me point out something which might be disturbing to you the people.  Any person working for or within the United Nations, even for one session, MUST give oath of loyalty to the United Na­tions and THEIR LOYALTY TO THE UNITED NATIONS MUST SUPERSEDE LOY­ALTY TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION while the United Nations Charter goes on destroying the United States Constitution.  This means that every one of your government who even participates in United Nations activities have taken this oath:

 

“I solemnly swear to exercise in all loyalty, discretion and con­science, the functions entrusted to me as a member of the inter­national service of the United Nations; to discharge those func­tions and regulate with the interests of the United Nations only in view, and not to seek or accept in­structions in regard to the per­formance of my duty from any government or authority external to the Organization.”

 

SERIOUS NOTE:  The United Nations Charter was also done by unlaw­ful use of the treaty-making power.  Now the United Nations is calling for all U.S. citizens to be totally disarmed.  Aided by Public Law 87-297, and other new laws, their dis­armament treaties will confis­cate every gun!  Then the po­lice force of the world will fall under the direction of a Soviet General.  The United Nations, you will note, will henceforth appoint a “World `President’” from the perma­nent members of the Secu­rity Coun­cil.  DO YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE BUSH CARES WHETHER OR NOT HE IS ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. AFTER THIS LITTLE TID-BIT?  HE BELIEVES HE WILL RULE THE WORLD!  I THINK NOT, HOW­EVER, FOR THE HEAD OF THE ZIONISTS, HENRY KISSINGER, AND OF THE CARTEL, DAVID ROCKEFELLER, (ENTITIES THEREOF) HAVE THE SAME NOTION AND I WOULD GUESS THAT THEY WILL HAVE THE FI­NAL SAY ABOUT SUCH A THING.

 

Now, America—do you have problems or do you have problems?  I sug­gest that you have seri­ous problems and a war ahead of you that you can do nothing about.  Is it not time to hear Sa­tan knocking at the door?

 

I apologize, chela, for causing you to need do all this extra work but I herein ask you to type the entire document so that it can be reprinted for use to send to Congressmen, etc.  I honor one, Berna­dine Smith, who has provided us with a good copy.  Just retype it and please use her em­phasis as shown by un­derlining of passages.

 

I ask that this portion; perhaps this entire “Express” be put to 8 1/2" x 11" for­mat for ease of handling.  Please ask the printer to simply enlarge the cover page—exactly as is.  We would uti­lize the document provided but I desire that you of my group KNOW what is within the docu­ment and this is the only way I know to insure that you study it well!

 

CONSTITUTIONOF THE UNITED NATIONS

 

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION

 

Treaty Doc. No. 97-19

 

The White House, October 5, 1981,

 

Transmittal letter of the President of the United States to the Senate of the United States:

With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratifica­tion, I transmit herewith a copy of the Constitution of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).  This Constitution was adopted by the United Nations Conference on the Establish­ment of the United Nations In­dustrial Development Organi­zation as a Specialized Agency on April 8, 1979, and signed on be­half of the United States of America on January 17, 1980.  The re­port of the Department of State with respect to the Constitution is also transmitted for the in­formation of the Senate.

 

The Constitution would establish UNIDO as an independent special­ized agency of the United Nations system.  It does not create a new entity, but rather revises UNIDO’s existing legal framework in a way that signifi­cantly improves the position of the United States and other major donors in budget, program and assessment determina­tions.

 

UNIDO’s principal purpose is to foster the industrialization of de­veloping countries.  It is cur­rently the third largest executing agency for the United Na­tions Development Program.  UNIDO’s wide-ranging activities are geared to aid developing countries in estab­lishing the tech­nical and insti­tutional skills necessary for the industrialization.  Many of these activities are con­sonant with the United States development, priorities, including development of in­digenous en­trepreneurial and productive capabilities in the private sector.  United States commercial and academic interests also bene­fit from UNIDO activity.

 

In recent years, there has been growing recognition of the need to formu­late more effective in­stitutions within the United Nations system to deal with the problems of development in an in­creasingly interdependent world.  Such insti­tutions need to serve the inter­ests of all member na­tions and to be governed in a manner that re­alistically reflects the political and economic situa­tion in the world today.

 

The Constitution would give UNIDO a new governing machinery that will make it more respon­sive to its member governments and that will give greater recognition to the special role of ma­jor donors, including the United States, other industrial democracies, and the Soviet bloc.  If they act together, the major donors will be able to block decisions on UNIDO’s program and bud­gets.  In this re­spect, the Constitution is a precedent-setting document.

 

The Constitution would also provide a specific right to withdrawal from UNIDO if the United States should ever determine that its in­terests are not served by continued membership.  This could not be accomplished under UNIDO’s current statute without withdrawal from the United Na­tions.

 

While the Constitution refers to the objectives of helping estab­lish a new in­ternational economic order, the United States has made clear its view that this does not refer to any preconceived notion of such an order as outlined in some UN resolutions to which the United States has taken ex­ception.

 

The Constitutionoffers the United States important advantages over UNIDO’s current status.  It provides an opportunity to increase UNIDO’s ef­fectiveness in promoting economic develop­ment in the de­veloping countries and, thus, its contribution to a more equitable and peaceful, in­ternational en­vironment.  In addition to helping create a better institutional framework, ratifica­tion of the Con­stitution by the United States will be a strong reaffirma­tion of our commitment to the industrial development of the less developed countries and demonstrate our political will to pursue beneficial relations with these countries.

 

I recommend that the Senate give prompt consideration to the Con­stitution and advise and con­sent to its ratification.

 

                                      RONALD REAGAN.

 

(**And so it was ratified and signed by Ronald Reagan.)

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL

 

_____

 

Department of State,

Washington, September 12, 1981

 

THE PRESIDENT: I have the honor to submit to you, with a view to its transmission to the Senate for advice and consent to ratifica­tion, the Constitu­tion of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), adopted by the United Nations Conference on the Es­tablishment of the United Nations Industrial Development Or­ganization as a Specialized Agency on April 8, 1979, and signed on behalf of the United States of America on January 17, 1980.

The Constitution would establish UNIDO as an independent special­ized agency of the United Nations system.  UNIDO now exists as an organiza­tion formally within the United Nations it­self, reporting to the General Assembly.

 

UNIDO has a mandate to provide developing countries with indus­trial-re­lated technical assis­tance (worth $76 million in 1980), in­cluding programs in industrial planning, institutional infrastruc­ture, factory establishment and management, training, feasibility studies, and invest­ment promotion.  Virtu­ally all of UNIDO’s tech­nical assistance expenditures are funded by vol­untary sources, pri­marily the United Nations Development Program.  UNIDO activi­ties funded by the United Nations regular assessed budget ($47 million in 1980) are largely in support of its technical assistance activi­ties, and include: macro-economic studies of factors affecting in­dustrialization; advice to LDC governments on development policies; in­dustrial sector, regional, country and case studies; statistical data collec­tion and analysis; expert group meetings in­cluding sec­toral Consultations; information processing and investment promo­tion.  UNIDO’s highly di­versified activities include many which are congenial to United States de­velopment priorities such as: employ­ment gen­eration, private sector de­velopment, basic human needs, ap­propriate tech­nology, and rural and agricultural related develop­ment.  American commer­cial and aca­demic interests also benefit from UNIDO activity.

 

UNIDO was established as an organ of the United Nations General As­sembly pursuant to United Nations General Assembly Resolutions 2089 (XX) and 2152 (XXI), adopted in 1965 and 1966, respectively.  In 1975, the United Na­tions General Assembly, endorsing the recommen­dation of the Second Gen­eral Conference of UNIDO, adopted Resolu­tion 3362 (S-VII) which estab­lished an intergovernmental committee of the whole fol­lowed by a conference of pleni-po­tentiaries to draft and consider a con­stitution to transform UNIDO into a spe­cialized agency of the United Na­tions.  The intergovernmental com­mittee of the whole met five times over a two-year period and was succeeded by the Conference on the Estab­lishment of UNIDO as a Spe­cialized Agency.

 

The Constitution, while not creating a new entity, revises UNIDO’s ex­isting legal framework, significantly improving the provisions relating to control of budget and programming.  Under the current regime, UNIDO’s work pro­gram is decided upon by its governing body, the Industrial De­velopment Board, while its program budget is set by the United Nations General Assem­bly as one component of the overall United Nations Pro­gram Budget.  Thus, UNIDO’s budget is cur­rently not subject to inter­governmental review by a body di­rectly responsible for UNIDO activi­ties; nor do the present insti­tutional arrangements, by which all questions are decided by major­ity vote, adequately reflect the special interest of major donors.

 

The Constitution seeks to correct these defects by providing thatthe pro­gram and budget of UNIDO shall both be acted upon by three governing bodies in succession: the Program and Budget Committee (the Commit­tee), the Indus­trial Development Board (the Board), and the General Con­ference (the Con­ference).  Each body must decide on the program and budget by a two-thirds majority vote.

**(H: Please note that this obsoletes your United States Constitu­tion of 1789!)**

 

In the Committee and the Board, the industrial democracies and the Soviet bloc (i.e., the major donors) hold substantially more than a third of the vote and thus could, if most of them agree, block adoption of a program or budget.  (The Soviets have traditionally taken a very conserva­tive po­sition on bud­getary issues.)  The Con­stitution thereby enables for the first time in the United Nations system, outside of the banking institutions, a special recogni­tion of the essential role of major donor states in United Nations af­fairs.  The Constitution is therefore a precedent setting docu­ment, responsive to the po­litical realities of the 1980’s and beyond.

 

The Constitution and the related resolutions on transition to spe­cialized agency status also achieve another objective of the United States in that they do not mandate any increase in United States contributions to UNIDO, but only change the method of assessment and payment in ways beneficial to the United States.  Currently, United States assessed contri­butions to UNIDO are determined and paid indirectly through the mecha­nism of the United Nations as­sessed budget, making it difficult for the United States to achieve a degree of influence within UNIDO concomitant with the level of those indirect con­tributions.  The Constitution will move toward correcting this situation by in­stituting direct assessed budget pay­ments to UNIDO and providing for as­sessments to be determined in a manner similar to the determination of the pro­gram and budget, with ma­jor donor States holding more than a third of the vote in the Board which must decide on assessments by a two-thirds major­ity.

 

It is also noteworthy that United Nations General Assembly Resolu­tion 96 (XXXIV) on Transi­tional Arrangements on the Establishment of the United Nations Industrial Development Or­ganization as a Spe­cialized Agency pro­vides for the termination of United Nations funding for UNIDO from the United Nations regular program budget and a corre­sponding reduction in this budgetupon establishment of UNIDO as a spe­cialized agency.

 

The Constitution consists of a preamble, twenty-nine articles (in six chapters) and three an­nexes.  The Preamble states that the States Parties, while bearing in mind the “broad objectives” of resolutions adopted by the sixth and seventh special sessions of the United Nations General Assem­bly and the Second General Confer­ence of UNIDO pertaining to the es­tablishment of a new interna­tional economic order, make certain declara­tions regarding economic development.  The declarations include the ne­cessity of establish­ing a just and equitable economic and social order; the essential role of industrialization to rapid economic and social develop­ment; the right of all countries to pursue industrialization; the neces­sity of concerted measures to promote the devel­opment, transfer and adaptation of technology internationally; and a determi­nation to promote the common welfare through expanding international eco­nomic cooperation.  The Preamble is basically hortatory, and contains no op­erational links to the rest of the Constitution.

 

**(H: Please note that this requiresa new economic and social or­der.)**

 

The objectives and functions of UNIDO are contained in Chapter I, Arti­cle 1 states that the primary objective of UNIDO will be the promotion and accel­eration of industrial development in the devel­oping countries with a view to assisting in the establishment of a new international eco­nomic order.  The language used in the Consti­tution, as indicated in the statement of the United States at the time of adoption of the Constitution, can be interpreted to make clear that Article 1 refers to UNIDO’s partici­pation in an evolu­tionary and truly consensual process to achieve a new international economic order **(H: NEW WORLD ORDER.)** and that Article 1 does not refer to any precon­ceived notion of a new international eco­nomic order as outlined in certain resolutions of the United Na­tions General Assembly sixth and seventh special sessions, regard­ing which the United States has reservations.

 

Article 2 lists the functions of UNIDO, all related to promoting industrial de­velopment and ba­sically similar to the functions spec­ified in UNIDO’s current statute, General Assembly resolu­tion 2152 (XXI).  The more im­portant func­tions include: coordinating United Nations industrial devel­opment activities; providing technical as­sistance for industrialization, in­cluding training and pilot facil­ities; managing an industrial information clearinghouse; advising and as­sisting devel­oping countries in formulating and executing de­velopment plans; assisting in the establishment and oper­ation of industries, to achieve full uti­lization of local human and natural resources; and as requested by the coun­tries concerned, providing a forum for contacts and negotiations.

 

********Dharma, stop please, and begin a new docu­ment!!!! ***NOW.****

 

June 15, 2011

http://fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J030.pdf