generated by an Adobe application 12.00

‘THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE – THE HOLOCAUST’ – PHEONIX JOURNAL #40 -CHAPTER  8

 

 

REC  #1    HATONN

TUE., NOV. 12, 1991   11:58 A.M.   YEAR 5, DAY 088

TUESDAY,  NOVEMBER 12,  1991

  TODAY’S  WATCH

 

Dharma, since we are so pressed for time this day I ask that we move right into the subject in point.  The “watch” would be mundane at any rate.  I note the leading news is that you have sent representatives to the Soviets to “set up a central bank for the Soviet people”.  The poor Soviets have to use “cash” for ev­erything and “...the Soviet Union cannot move into a new world society unless there can be freeing of funds through loans to fund business, etc., etc., etc.”  Good luck, world.

 

Let’s get back to the lie of 6 million Jews killed in a so-called Holocaust.

 

IMPOSSIBLE  BIRTH  RATE

 

Indisputable evidence is also provided by the post-war world Jewish population statistics.  The World Almanac of 1938 gives the number of Jews in the world as 16,588,259.  But after the war, the New York Times, Feb. 22, 1948 placed the number of Jews in the world at a minimum of 15,600,000 and a maximum of 18,700,000.  Quite obviously, these fig­ures make it impossible for the number of Jewish war-time casualties to be measured in anything but “thousands”.  Six­teen and a half million in 1938 minus the alleged six mil­lion leaves ten million; the New York Times figures would mean, therefore, that the world’s Jews produced seven million births, almost doubling their numbers, in the space of ten years.  This is patently ridiculous.

 

It would appear, therefore, that the great majority of the missing “six million” were in fact emi­grants—emigrants to European countries, to the Soviet Union and the United States before, during and after the war.  And emigrants also, in vast numbers to Palestine during and espe­cially at the end of the war.  After 1945, boat-loads of these Jewish survivors entered Palestine ille­gally from Europe, causing considerable embarrassment to the British Government of the time; indeed so great were the num­bers that the H.M. Stationery Office publication No. 190 (Nov. 5, 1946) described them as “almost amounting to a second Exo­dus”.  It was these emi­grants to all parts of the world who had swollen the world Jewish population to between 15 and 18 mil­lion by 1948, and probably the greatest part of them were emi­grants to the United States who entered in violation of the quota laws.  On Aug. 16th, 1963 David Ben Gurion, President of Is­rael, stated that although the official Jewish population of America was said to be 5,600,000, “the total number would not be estimated too high at 9,000,000” (Deutsche Wechenzeltung, Nov. 23rd, 1963).  Now, chelas, I don’t care WHO you are—you cannot have it both ways but, obviously you-the-world have bitten on all fronts and on all figures depending upon the conve­nient arithmetic.  Now why would Ben Gurion use such nice high numbers if it were not true?  Well, let’s see—the reason for this high figure is underlined by Albert Maisal in his article “Our Newest Americans” (Readers Digest, Jan. 1957), for he reveals that “Soon af­ter World War II, by Presidential de­cree, 90 per cent of all quota visas for central and eastern Europe were issued to the uprooted.”

 

Now how about other methods of counting, etc.  It seems that thousands upon thousands of names began to appear in the obit­uary columns and most specifically in  the columns of Auf­bau, the Jewish American weekly published in New York.  Jewish emigrants to the United States subsequently changed their names.  In the records, however, it had to show “formerly” XXX, as example: Arthur Kingsley [formerly Dr. Konigsberger of Frankfurt].  Could it be that some or all of these people whose names are “deceased” were included in the missing six million in Eu­rope?

 

 

THE  SIX  MILLION:  DOCUMENTARY  EVIDENCE

 

From the foregoing it would seem certain that the figure of six million murdered Jews amounts to nothing more than a vague compromise between several quite baseless estimates; there is not a shred of documentary evidence for it that is trustworthy.  Occasionally, writers narrow it down to give a disarming ap­pearance of authenticity.  Lord Russell of Liverpool, for exam­ple, in his The Scourge of the Swastika (London, 1954) claimed that “Not less than five million Jews died in German concentra­tion camps,” having satisfied himself that he was somewhere between those who estimated 6 million and those who preferred 4 million.  But, he admitted, “The real number will never be known.”  If so, it is difficult to know how he could have as­serted “not less than five million”.  The Joint Distribution Committee favors 5,012,000 but the Jewish “expert” Reitlinger suggests a novel figure of 4,192,200 “missing Jews” of whom an estimated one third died of natu­ral causes.  Perhaps this “missing” and “natural causes” could be lumped in with the “Eisenhower’s Death Camps” among “other losses”.  I shall have to later refresh your minds re­garding your own “death camps” where documentation is more fully available.

 

At any rate the above numbers would indicate a reduction of the number deliberately “exterminated” to a “possible” 2,796,000.  However, Dr. M. Perlzweig, the New York dele­gate to a World Jewish Congress press conference held at Geneva in 1948 stated: “The price of the downfall of National Socialism and Fascism is the fact that seven million Jews lost their lives thanks to cruel Anti-Semitism.”  Here again, you have this newly originated gross error in se­mantics.  These so-called Jews are NOT Semites!  In the Press and elsewhere, the figure is often casually lifted to eight million or sometimes even nine million.  Do any of you have any concept of 9 million people?  I agree that ONE is too many to be slain and moreover, how dare ones de­file that ONE by lying about 6 million??  The facts are, and we have proved it, none of these fig­ures are in the remotest de­gree plausible or possible, indeed, they are totally ridiculous!

 

 

FANTASTIC  EXAGGERATIONS

 

So far as is known, the first accusation against the Germans of the mass murder of Jews in war-time Europe was made by the Polish Jew Rafael Lemkin in his book AXIS RULE IN OCCU­PIED EUROPE, published in New York in 1943.  Somewhat coincidentally, Lemkin was later to draw up the U.N. Genocide Convention, which seeks to outlaw “racialism”.  His book claimed that the Nazis had destroyed millions of Jews, perhaps as many as six millions.  This, by 1943, would have been re­markable indeed, since the action was allegedly started only in the summer of 1942.  At such a rate, the entire world Jewish population would have been exterminated by 1945.

 

After the war, propaganda estimates spiralled to heights even more fantastic.  Kurt Gerstein, an anti-Nazi who claimed to have infiltrated the S.S., told the French interrogator Raymond Cartier that he knew that no less than forty million concentration camp internees had been gassed.  (How many of you can relate to 40 million?)  In his first signed memorandum of April 26th, 1945, he reduced the figure to 25 million, but even this was too bizarre for French Intelli­gence and in his second memorandum, signed at Rottweil on May 4th, 1945, he brought the fig­ure closer to the six million preferred at the Nuremberg Trials.  Gerstein’s sister was congeni­tally insane and died by euthanasia, which may well suggest a streak of mental insta­bility in Ger­stein himself but, of course, that is only pure speculation—perhaps he just couldn’t count.  He had, in fact, been convicted in 1936 of sending eccentric mail through the post.  After his two “confessions” he hanged himself at Cherche Midi Prison in Paris—or so the story goes.

 

Gerstein alleged that during the war he passed on information concerning the murder of Jews to the Swedish Government through a German baron, but for some inexplicable reason his re­port was “filed away and forgotten”.  He also claimed that in August 1942 he informed the Papal nuncio in Berlin about the whole “extermination Program”, but the reverend person merely told him to “Get out”.  The Gerstein statements abound with claims to have witnessed the most gi­gantic mass executions (twelve thousand in a single day at Belzec), while the sec­ond memoran­dum describes a visit by Hitler to a concentration camp in Poland on June 6th, 1942 which is known never to have taken place.  Shades of “October Surprise”!?

 

Gerstein’s fantastic exaggerations have done little but discredit the whole notion of mass exter­mination.  Indeed, the Evangeli­cal Bishop Wilhelm Dibelius of Berlin denounced his memo­randa as “Untrustworthy” (H. Rothfels, “Augenzeugenbericht zu den Massenvergasungen” in Vierteljahrshefte fur Zeit­geschichte, April 1955).  This is only important because Ger­stein was “one of them”.  It is an incredible fact, however, that in spite of this denunciation, the German Government in 1955 issued an edition of the second Gerstein memorandum for distri­bution in German schools (Dokementation zur Masenverga­sung, Bonn, 1955).  In it they stated that Di­belius placed his special confidence in Gerstein and that the memoranda were “valid beyond any doubt”.  This is a striking example of the way in which the baseless charge of genocide by the Nazis is perpet­uated in Germany, and directed especially to the youth.

 

The story of six million Jews exterminated during the war was given final authority at the Nuremberg Trials by the statement of Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl.  He had been an assistant of Eich­mann’s, but was in fact a rather strange person in the service of Ameri­can Intelligence who had written several books under the pseudonym of Walter Hagen.  Hoettl also worked for So­viet es­pionage, collaborating with two Jewish emigrants from Vienna, Perger and Verber, who acted as U.S. officers during the pre­liminary inquiries of the Nurenberg Trials.  It is remark­able that the testimony of this highly dubious person Hoettl is said to con­stitute the only “proof” regarding the murder of six million Jews.  In his affidavit of November 26th, 1945 he stated, not that he knew but that Eichmann had “told him” in August 1944 in Budapest that a total of 6 million Jews had been exterminated.  Needless to say, Eichmann never corroborated this claim at his trial.  Hoettl was working as an American spy during the whole of the latter period of the war, and it is there­fore very odd in­deed that he never gave the slightest hint to the Americans of a

policy to murder Jews, even though he worked directly under Heydrich and Eichmann.

ABSENCE  OF  EVIDENCE

 

It should be emphasized straight away that there is not a single document in existence which proves that the Germans intended to, or carried out, the deliberate murder of Jews.  In Poli­akov and Wulf’s Das Dritte Reich und die Juden: Dokumente and Aufsatze (Berlin, 1955), the most that they can assemble are statements extracted after the war from people like Hoettl, Ohlendorf and Wisliceny, the latter un­der torture in a Soviet prison.  In the absence of any evi­dence, therefore, Poliakov was forced to write: “The three or four people chiefly involved in drawing up the plan for to­tal extermination are dead, and no documents survive.”  This seems very convenient.  Quite obviously, both the plan and the “three or four” people are nothing but nebulous as­sumptions on the part of the writer, and are entirely un­provable.  Doesn’t this sound a bit like “read my lips?” and/or “Ollie North did it ALL!”?

 

The documents which do survive, of course, make no mention at all of extermination, so that writers like Poliakov and Reitlinger again make the convenient assumption that such orders were generally “verbal”.  Though lacking any documentary proof, they assume that a plan to murder Jews must have originated in 1941, coinciding with the attack on Russia.  Phase one of the plan is alleged to have involved the massacre of Soviet Jews, a claim we shall later dis­prove.  The rest of the program is sup­posed to have begun in March 1942, with the deporta­tion and concentration of European Jews in the eastern camps of the Polish Government-Gen­eral, such as the giant industrial com­plex at Auschwitz near Cracow.  The fantastic and quite groundless assumption throughout is that transportation to the East supervised by Eichmann’s department, actually meant im­mediate extermination in ovens on arrival.

 

According to Manvell and Frankl  (HEINRICH HIMMLER, London, 1965), the policy of geno­cide “seems to have been ar­rived at” after “secret discussions” between Hitler and Himmler (p. 118), though they fail to prove it, Reitlinger and Poliakov guess along similar “verbal” lines, adding that no one else was allowed to be present at these discussions, and no records were ever kept of them.  This is the purest invention, for there is not a shred of evi­dence that even sug­gests such outlandish meetings took place.  William Shirer, in his generally wild and irrespon­sible book THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH, is similarly muted on the subject of doc­umentary proof.  He states weakly that Hitler’s supposed order for the murder of Jews “apparently was never committed to paper—at least no copy of it has yet been unearthed.  It was probably given ver­bally to Goering, Himmler and Heydrich, who passed it on down....” (p. 1148).

 

A typical example of the kind of “proof” quoted in support of the extermination legend is given by Manvell and Frankl.  They cite a memorandum of 31st July 1941 sent by Goering to Hey­drich, who  headed the Reich Security Head Office and was Himmler’s deputy.  Signifi­cantly, the memorandum begins: “Supplementing the task that was assigned to you on 24th Jan. 1939 to solve the Jewish problem by means of emigration and evacuation in the best pos­sible way ac­cording to present condi­tions...”  The supplementary task assigned in the memo­randum is a “total solution (Gesamtlosung) of the Jewish question within the area of German influence in Europe”, which the authors admit means concentration in the East, and it requests prepara­tions for the “organizational, financial, and material matters” involved.  The memoran­dum then re­quests a future plan for the “desired final solution” (Endlosung), which clearly refers to the ideal and ultimate scheme of emigration and evacuation men­tioned at the begin­ning of the directive.  No mention whatever is made of murdering people, but Manvell and Frankl assure you that this is what the memorandum is really about.  Again, of course, the “true nature” of the final as distinct from the total solution “was made known to Heydrich by Goering verbally” (Ibid. p. 118).  The convenience of these “verbal” di­rectives issuing back and forth is obvious.

 

 

THE  WANNSEE  CONFERENCE

 

The final details of the plan to exterminate Jews were supposed to have been made at a confer­ence at Gross Wannsee in Berlin on 20th January 1942 presided over by Heydrich (Poliakov, Das Dritte Reich und die Juden, p. 120 ff; Reitlinger, THE FI­NAL SOLUTION, p. 95 ff).  Offi­cials of all German Ministries were present, and Muller and Eichmann represented Gestapo Head Office.  Reitlinger and Manvell and Frankl consider the minutes of this confer­ence to be their trump card in proving the existence of a genocide plan, but the truth is that no such plan was even remotely mentioned, and what is more, they freely admit this.  Manvell and Frankl ex­plain it away rather lamely by saying that “The minutes are shrouded in the form of official­dom that cloaks the real significance of the words and terminol­ogy that are used” (THE INCOMPA­RABLE CRIME, Lon­don, 1967, p. 46), which really means that they in­tend to inter­pret them in their own way.  What Heydrich actually said was that, as in the memorandum quoted above, he had been commis­sioned by Goering to arrange a solution to the Jewish problem.  He reviewed the history of Jewish emigration, stated that the war had rendered the Madagascar project im­practical, and con­tinued: “The emigration program has been replaced now by the evacuation of Jews to the east as a further possible solution, in ac­cordance with the previous authorization of the Fuhrer.”  Here, he explained, their labor was to be utilized.  All this is supposed to be deeply sinister, and pregnant with the hidden meaning that the Jews were to be exterminated, though Prof. Paul Rassinier, a Frenchman interned at Buchenwald who has done sterling work in re­futing the myth of the Six Million, ex­plains that it means precisely what it says, i.e., the concen­tration of the Jews for labor in the immense eastern ghetto of the Polish Government-General.  “There they were to wait until the end of the war, for the re-opening of international discussions which would decide their future.  This decision was finally reached at the interministerial Berlin-Wannsee conference...” (Rassinier, Le Meritable Proces Eichmann, p. 20).  Manvell and Frankl, however, remain undaunted by the complete lack of reference to extermination.  At the Wannsee conference, they write, “Direct references to killing were avoided, Heydrich favoring the term “Arbeitseinsatz im Os­sten” (Labor assignment in the East)”  (HEINRICH HIMMLER, P. 209).  Why you should not ac­cept labor assignment in the East to mean labor assignment in the East is not explained.

 

According to Reitlinger and others, innumerable directives actually specifying extermina­tion then passed between Himmler, Heydrich, Eichmann and commandant Hoess in the subsequent months of 1942, but of course, “none have survived”.

 

GROUNDLESS  ASSUMPTIONS  AND  TWISTED  WORDS

 

The complete lack of documentary evidence to support the exis­tence of an extermination plan has led to the habit of reinter­preting the documents that do survive.  For example, it is held that a document concerning deportation is not about deportation at all, but a cunning way of talking about extermination.  Man­vell and Frankl state that “various terms were used to cam­ouflage genocide.  These included “Aussiedlung” (desettlement) and “Abberforderung” (removal)” (ibid. p. 265).  Thus, as you will have already seen, words are no longer assumed to mean what they say if they prove too inconvenient.  This is a very good knack that the Khazarian Zionists have to mislead, disin­form and mock you—they simply change the mean­ings of terms and you end up too confused to realize you have been “had”.

 

This kind of thing is taken to the most incredible extremes, such as their interpretation of Hey­drich’s directive for labor assign­ment in the East.  Another example is a reference to Himm­ler’s order for sending deportees to the East, “that is having them killed” (ibid. p. 251).  Re­itlinger, equally at a loss for evidence, does exactly the same, declaring that from the “circumlocutionary” words of the Wannsee conference it is ob­vious that “the slow murder of an entire race was in­tended” (ibid. p. 98).

 

A review of the documentary situation is important, because it reveals the edifice of guesswork and baseless assumptions upon which the extermination legend is built.  The Germans had an extra-ordinary propensity for recording everything on paper in the most careful detail, yet among the thousands of captured documents of the S.S. and Gestapo, the records of the Reich Security Head Office, the files of Himmler’s headquarters and Hitler’s own war directives there is not a single order for the extermination of Jews or anyone else.  It will be seen later that this has, in fact, been admitted by the World Cen­tre of Contemporary Jewish Documenta­tion at Tel-Aviv.  Attempts to find “veiled allu­sions” to genocide in speeches like that of Himm­ler’s to his S.S. Obergruppenfuhrers at Posen in 1943 are likewise quite hopeless.  Nuremberg state­ments extracted after the war, invariably under duress, are ex­amined in the following chap­ter.

 

Let us leave this for now as we have a meeting to attend.  Thank you.

Hatonn to clear, please.

http://fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J040.pdf  

March 28, 2011

Maarch 28, 2011