generated by an Adobe application 12.00

‘THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE, VOL II- THE HOLOCAUST’ - PHOENIX JOURNAL #40 - CHAPTER  7

 

REC  #2    HATONN

 MON., NOV. 11, 1991   12:28 P.M.   YEAR 5, DAY 087

ZIONIST  POLICY  STUDIED

The Nazi view of Jewish emigration was not limited to a nega­tive policy of simple expulsion, but was formulated along the lines of modern Zionism.  The founder of political Zionism in the 19th century, Theodore Herzl, in his work THE JEWISH STATE (please read that sen­tence again—Jewish (18th century) Zionism (19th century), had originally conceived of Mada­gascar as a na­tional homeland for the Jews, and this possibil­ity was seriously studied by the Nazis.  It had been a main plank of the National Socialist party platform before 1933 and was published by the party in pamphlet form.  This stated that the revival of Israel as a Jewish state was much less accept­able since it would result in perpetual war and disruption in the Arab world, which has indeed been the case.  The Germans were not original in proposing Jewish emigration to Madagascar; the Polish Government had already considered the scheme in re­spect of their Jewish population, and in 1937 they sent the Michael Lepecki expedition to Madagascar, accompanied by Jewish representatives, to investigate the problems involved.

 

The first Nazi proposals for the Madagascar solution were made in association with the Schacht Plan of 1938.  On the advice of Goering, Hitler agreed to send the President of the Reichsbank, Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, to London for discussions with Jewish representatives Lord Bearsted and Mr. Rublee of New York (cf. Reitlinger, The Final Solution, London, 1953, p. 20).  The plan was that German Jewish assets would be frozen as security for an international loan to finance Jewish emigration to Pales­tine, and Schacht reported on these negotiations to Hitler at Bercht­esgaden on January 2, 1939.  The plan, which failed due to British refusal to accept the financial terms, was first put for­ward on November 12, 1938 at a conference con­vened by Go­ering, who revealed that Hitler was already considering the emi­gration of Jews to a settlement in Madagas­car (ibid. p. 21).  Later, in December, Ribbentrop was told by M. Gorges Bonnet, the French Foreign Secretary, that the French Government itself was planning the evacuation of 10,000 Jews to Madagascar.

 

Prior to the Schacht Palestine proposals of 1938, which were es­sentially a protraction of discus­sions that had begun as early as 1935, numerous attempts had been made to secure Jew­ish emi­gration to other European nations, and these efforts culminated in the Evian Conference of July 1938.  However, by 1939 the scheme of Jewish emigration to Madagascar had gained the most favor in German circles.  It is true that in London Helmuth Wohltat of the German For­eign Office discussed limited Jewish emigration to Rhodesia and British Guiana as late as April 1939; but by January 24th, when Goering wrote to Interior Minister Frick ordering the creation of a Central Emigration Office for Jews, and commissioned Heydrich of the Reich Security Head Office to solve the Jewish problem “by means of emigration and evacuation”, the Mada­gascar Plan was being studied in earnest.

 

By 1939, the consistent efforts of the German Government to secure the departure of Jews from the Reich had resulted in the emigration of 400,000 German Jews from a total pop­ulation of about 600,000, and an additional 480,000 emi­grants from Austria and Czechoslovakia, which constituted almost their entire Jewish populations.  This was ac­complished through Of­fices of Jewish Emigration in Berlin, Vienna and Prague estab­lished by Adolf Eichmann, the head of the Jewish Investigation Office of the Gestapo.  So eager were the Germans to secure this emigration that Eichmann even established a training center in Austria, where young Jews could learn farming in anticipation of being smuggled illegally to Palestine (Manvell & Frankl, S.S. AND GESTAPO, p. 60).  Had Hitler cherished any intention of exterminating the Jews, it is inconceivable that he would have allowed more than 800,000 to leave Reich territory with the bulk of their wealth, much less considered plans for their mass emigration to Palestine or Madagascar.  What is more, we shall see that the policy of emigration from Europe was still under considera­tion well into the war period, notably the Madagascar Plan, which Eichmann discussed in 1940 with French Colonial Office experts after the defeat of France had made the sur­render of the colony a practical proposition.

 

GERMAN  POLICY  TOWARDS  THE  JEWS  AFTER

THE  OUTBREAK  OF  WAR

 

With the coming of the war, the situation regarding the Jews al­tered drastically.  It is not widely known that world Jewry de­clared itself to be a belligerent party in the Second World War, and there was therefore ample basis under international law for the Germans to intern the Jewish population as a hostile force.  On September 5, 1939, Chaim Weizmann, the principal Zionist leader, had declared war against Germany on behalf of the world’s Jews, stating that “the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies...The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, techni­cal ability, resources etc....”  (Jewish Chroni­cle, Sept. 8, 1939).

 

DETENTION  OF  ENEMY  ALIENS

 

All Jews had thus been declared agents willing to prosecute a war against the German Reich, and as a consequence, Himmler and Heydrich were eventually to begin the policy of intern­ment.  It is worth noting that the United States and Canada had already interned all Japanese aliens and citizens of Japanese descent in detention camps before the Germans applied the same secu­rity mea­sures against the Jews of Europe.  Moreover, there had been no such evi­dence or declaration of disloyalty by these Japanese Americans as had been given by Weiz­mann.  The British, too, dur­ing the Boer War, interned all the women and children of the pop­ulation, and thousands had died as a result, yet in no sense could the British be charged with wanting to ex­terminate the Boers.

 

The detention of Jews in the occupied territories of Europe served two essential purposes from the German viewpoint.  The first was to prevent unrest and subversion; Himmler had in­formed Mussolini on October 11th, 1942, that German policy towards the Jews had altered during wartime entirely for reasons of military security.  He complained that thousands of Jews in the occupied regions were conducting partisan warfare, sabotage and espionage, a view confirmed by official Soviet information given to Raymond Arthur Davis that no less than 35,000 Euro­pean Jews were waging partisan war under Tito in Yugoslavia.  As a result, Jews were to be transported to restricted areas and detention camps, both in Germany, and especially after March 1942 in the Government-General of Poland.

As the war proceeded, the policy developed of using Jewish detainees for labor in the war-ef­fort.  The question of labor is fundamental when considering the alleged plan of geno­cide against the Jews, for on grounds of logic alone the latter would entail the most senseless waste of manpower, time and energy while prosecuting a war of survival on two fronts.  Certainly af­ter the attack on Russia, the idea of compulsory labor had taken precedence over German plans for Jewish emigration.  The protocol of a conversation be­tween Hitler and the Hungarian regent Horthy on April 17th, 1943, reveals that the German leader personally requested Horthy to release 100,000 Hungarian Jews for work in the “pursuit-plane pro­gram” of the Luftwaffe at a time when the aerial bombardment of Germany was increasing (Reitlinger, DIE ENDLOSUNG, Berlin, 1945, p. 478).  This took place at a time when, suppos­edly, the Germans were already seeking to exterminate the Jews, but Hitler’s request clearly demonstrates the priority aim of expanding his labor force.

 

In harmony with this program, concentration camps became, in fact, industrial complexes.  At every camp where Jews and other nationalities were detained, there were large industrial plants and factories supplying material for the German war-ef­fort—the Buna rubber factory at Bergen-Bergen, for example, Buna and I.G. Farben Industrie (Uh-oh—”Farben” again!) at Auschwitz, and the electrical firm of Siemens (oops!) at Ravensbruck (dear ones, these are Jewish!).  In many cases, special concentration camp money notes were issued as payment for labor, en­abling prisoners to buy extra rations from camp shops.  The Germans were determined to ob­tain the maximum economic return from the concentration camp system, an object wholly at variance with any plan to exterminate millions of peo­ple in them.  It was the function of the S.S. Economy and Ad­ministration Office, headed by Oswald Pohl, to see that the concentra­tion camps became major industrial producers.

 

EMIGRATION  STILL  FAVORED

 

It is a remarkable fact, however, that well into the war period, the Germans continued to im­plement the policy of Jewish emi­gration.  The fall of France in 1940 enabled the German Gov­ernment to open serious negotiations with the French for the transfer of European Jews to Madagascar.  A memorandum of August 1942 from Luther, Secretary-of-State in the German Foreign Office, reveals that he had conducted these negotiations between July and December 1940 when they were terminated by the French.  A circular from Luther’s department dated August 15th, 1940 shows that the details of the German plan had been worked out by Eich­mann, for it is signed by his assistant, Dan­necker.  Eichmann had, in fact, been commissioned in August to draw up a detailed Madagascar Plan and Dannecker was em­ployed in research on Madagascar at the French Colonial Office (Reitlinger, THE FINAL SOLUTION, p. 77).  The proposals of August 15th were that an inter-European bank was to finance the emigration of four million Jews throughout a phased pro­gram.  Luther’s 1942 memorandum shows that Hey­drich had obtained Himmler’s approval of this plan before the end of Au­gust and had also sub­mitted it to Goering.  It certainly met with Hitler’s approval, for as early as June 17th his inter­preter, Schmidt, recalls Hitler observing to Mussolini that “One could found a State of Is­rael in Madagascar” (Schmidt, HITLER’S INTERPRETER, London, 1951, p. 178).

 

Although the French terminated the Madagascar negotiations in December, 1940, Poliakov, the director of the Center of Jewish Documentation in Paris, admits that the Germans never­theless pursued the scheme, and that Eichmann was still busy with it throughout 1941.  Even­tually, however, it was rendered im­practical by the progress of the war, in particular by the situa­tion af­ter the invasion of Russia, and on February 10th, 1942, the Foreign Office was in­formed that the plan had been tem­porarily shelved.  This ruling, sent to the Foreign Office by Luther’s as­sistant, Rademacher, is of great importance, be­cause it demonstrates con­clusively that the term “Final Solu­tion” meant only the emigration of Jews, and also that transportation to the eastern ghettos and concentration camps such as Auschwitz consti­tuted nothing but an alter­native plan of evacuation.  The directive reads: “The war with the Soviet Union has in the mean­time created the possi­bility of disposing of other territories for the Final Solution.  In consequence the Fuhrer has decided that the Jews should be evacuated not to Madagascar but to the East.  Madagascar need no longer therefore be con­sidered in connection with the Final Solution”  (Reitlinger, ibid. p. 79).  The details of this evacuation had been discussed a month earlier at the Wannsee Confer­ence in Berlin, which we shall examine be­low.

 

Reitlinger and Poliakov both make the entirely unfounded sup­position that because the Mada­gascar Plan had been shelved, the Germans must necessarily have been thinking “extermination”.  Only a month later, however, on March 7th, 1942, Goebbels wrote a memo­randum in favor of the Madagascar Plan as a “final solution” of the Jewish question (Manvell & Frankl, DR. GOEBBELS, London, 1960, p. 165).  In the meantime he ap­proved of the Jews be­ing “concentrated in the East”.  Later Goebbels memoranda also stress deportation to the East (i.e., the Government-General of Poland) and lay emphasis on the need for compul­sory labor there; once the policy of evacuation to the East had been inaugurated, the use of Jewish labor be­came a fundamental part of the operation.  It is perfectly clear from the fore­going that the term “Final Solution” was applied both to Madagascar and to the Eastern territo­ries, and that there­fore it meant only the deportation of the Jews.

 

Even as late as May 1944, the Germans were prepared to allow the emigration of one million European Jews from Europe.  An account of this proposal is given by Alexander Weissberg, a prominent Soviet Jewish scientist deported during the Stalin purges, in his book DIE GESCHICHTE VON JOEL BRAND (Cologne, 1956).  Weissberg, who spent the war in Cracow though he expected the Germans to intern him in a concentration camp, explains that on the personal authorization of Himmler, Eichmann had sent the Budapest Jewish leader Joel Brand to Is­tanbul with an offer to the Allies to permit the transfer of one million European Jews in the midst of the war.  (If the “extermination” writers are to be believed, there were scarcely one mil­lion Jews left by May, 1944).  The Gestapo admitted that the transportation involved would greatly inconvenience the German war-effort, but were prepared to allow it in exchange for 10,000 trucks to be used exclusively on the Russian front.  Unfortunately, the plan came to nothing; the British concluded that Brand must be a dangerous Nazi agent and immediately im­prisoned him in Cairo, while the Press denounced the offer as a Nazi trick.  Winston Churchill, though orating to the effect that the treatment of the Hungarian Jews was probably “the biggest and most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world,” nevertheless told Chaim Weizmann that acceptance of the Brand offer was impossible since it would be a betrayal of his Russian Allies.  Although the plan was fruitless, it well il­lustrates that no one allegedly carrying out “thorough” extermi­nation would permit the emi­gration of a million Jews, and it demonstrates, too, the prime importance placed by the Ger­mans on the war-effort.

 

POPULATION  AND  EMIGRATION

 

Statistics relating to Jewish populations are not everywhere known in precise detail, approxi­mations for various coun­tries differing widely, and it is also unknown exactly how many Jews were deported and interned at any one time be­tween the years 1939-1945.  In general, however, what reli­able statistics there are, especially those relating to emigra­tion, are sufficient to show that not a fraction of six million Jews could have been exter­minated .

 

In the first place, this claim cannot remotely be upheld on ex­amination of the European Jewish population figures.  Accord­ing to CHAMBERS ENCYCLOPEDIA the total number of Jews liv­ing in pre-war Europe was some 6,500,000.  Quite clearly, this would mean that almost the en­tire number were ex­terminated.  But the Baseler Nachrichten, a neutral Swiss pub­lication em­ploying available Jewish statistical data, establishes that between 1933 and 1945, 1,500,000 Jews emigrated to Britain, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Australia, China, India, Palestine and the United States.  This is confirmed by the Jewish journalist Bruno Blau, who cites the same fig­ure in the New York Jewish paper Aufbau, August 13th, 1948.  Of these emi­grants, approxi­mately 400,000 came from Germany before September 1939.  This is acknowledged by the World Jewish Congress in its publication UNITY IN DISPERSION (p. 377), which states that: “The majority of the German Jews succeeded in leaving Germany before the war broke out.”  In addition to the German Jews, 220,000 of the total 280,000 Austrian Jews had emi­grated by September, 1939, while from March 1939 onwards the Institute for Jewish Emigra­tion in Prague had se­cured the emigration of 260,000 Jews from former Czechoslo­vakia.  In all, only 360,000 Jews remained in Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia after September 1939.  From Poland, an estimated 500,000 had emigrated prior to the outbreak of war.  These figures mean that the number of Jewish emigrants from other European countries (France, the Netherlands, Italy, the countries of eastern Europe, etc.) was approximately 120,000.

 

This exodus of Jews before and during hostilities, therefore, re­duces the number of Jews in Eu­rope to about 5,000,000.  In ad­dition to these emigrants, you must also include the number of Jews who fled to the Soviet Union after 1939, and who were later evacuated beyond reach of the German invaders.  It will be shown below that the majority of these, about 1,250,000 were migrants from Poland.  But apart from Poland, Reitlinger admits that 300,000 other Eu­ropean Jews slipped into Soviet territory between 1939 and 1941.  This brings the total of Jewish emi­grants to the Soviet Union to about 1,550,000.  In Colliers mag­azine, June 9th, 1945, Freiling Foster, writing of the Jews in Russia, explained: “2,200,000 have migrated to the Soviet Union since 1939 to escape from the Nazis.”  But the lower es­timate is probably more accurate.

Jewish migration to the Soviet Union, therefore, reduces the number of Jews within the sphere of German occupation to around 3 1/2 million, about 3,450,000.  From these should be de­ducted those Jews living in neutral European countries who escaped the consequences of the war.  Ac­cording to the 1942 WORLD ALMANAC p. 594), the number of Jews living in Gibraltar, Britain, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ire­land and Turkey was 413,128.

 

3  MILLION  JEWS  IN  EUROPE

 

A figure, consequently, of about 3 million Jews in German-occupied Europe is as accu­rate as the available emigration statistics will allow.  Approximately the same number, how­ever, can be deduced in another way if you examine statis­tics for the Jewish popula­tion remaining in countries occu­pied by the Reich.  More than half of those Jews who mi­grated to the Soviet Union after 1939 came from Poland.  It is fre­quently claimed that the war with Poland added some 3 million Jews to the German sphere of influence and that almost the whole of this Polish Jewish population was “exterminated”.  This is a major factual error.  The 1931 Jewish popula­tion cen­sus for Poland put the number of Jews at 2,732,600 (Reitlinger, DIE ENDLOSUNG, p. 36).  Reitlinger states that at least 1, 170,000 of these were in the Russian zone occupied in the au­tumn of 1939, about a million of whom were evacuated to the Urals and south Siberia after the German invasion of June 1941 (ibid. p. 50).  As described above, an estimated 500,000 Jews had emigrated from Poland prior to the war.  Moreover, the journalist Raymond Arthur Davis, who spent the war in the So­viet Union, observed that ap­proximately 250,000 had already fled from German-occupied Poland to Russia between 1939 and 1941 and were to be encountered in every Soviet province (ODYSSEY THROUGH HELL, N.Y., 1946).  Subtracting these figures from the population of 2,732,600, therefore, and allowing for the normal population increase, no more than 1,100,000 Polish Jews could have been under German rule at the end of 1939.  (GUTACHEN DES INSTITUTS FUR ZEITGESCHICHTE, Munich, 1956, p. 80).

 

To this number we may add the 360,000 Jews remaining in Germany, Austria and former Czechoslovakia (Bohemia-Moravia and Slovakia) after the extensive emigration from those countries prior to the war described above.  Of the 320,000 French Jews, the Public Prosecu­tor representing that part of the indictment relating to France at the Nuremberg Trials, stated that 120,000 Jews were deported, though Reitlinger estimates only about 50,000.  Thus the total number of Jews under Nazi rule remains below two million.  Deportations from the Scandina­vian countries were few, and from Bulgaria none at all.  When the Jewish populations of Hol­land (140,000), Belgium (40,000), Italy (50,000), Yugoslavia (55,000), Hungary (380,000) and Rumania (720,000) are included, the figure does not much exceed 3 million.  This excess is due to the fact that the latter figures are pre-war estimates unaffected by emi­gration, which from these countries accounted for about 120,000 (see above).  This cross-checking, therefore, con­firms the esti­mate of approximately 3 million European Jews under German occupation.

 

RUSSIAN  JEWS  EVACUATED

 

The precise figures concerning Russian Jews are unknown, and have therefore been the subject of extreme exaggeration.  The Jewish statistician Jacob Leszczynski states that in 1939 there were 2,100,000 Jews living in future German-occupied Russia, i.e., western Russia.  In addi­tion, some 260,000 lived in the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.  According to Louis Levine, President of the American Jewish Council for Russian Relief, who made a post-war tour of the Soviet Union and submitted a report on the status of Jews there, the majority of these numbers were evacuated east after the German armies launched their invasion.  In Chicago, on October 30, 1946, he declared that: “At the outset of the war, Jews were amongst the first evac­uated from the western regions threatened by the Hit­lerite invaders, and shipped to safety east of the Urals.  Two million Jews were thus saved.”  This high number is con­firmed by the Jewish journalist David Bergelson, who wrote in the Moscow Yiddish paper Ainikeit, Dec. 5th, 1942, that “thanks to the evacuation, the majority (80%) of the Jews in the Ukraine, White Russia, Lithuania and Latvia before the arrival of the Germans were rescued.”  Reitlinger agrees with the Jewish au­thority Joseph Schechtmann, who admits that huge num­bers were evacuated, though he estimates a slightly higher number of Russian and Baltic Jews left under German oc­cupation, between 650,000 and 850,000 (Reitlinger, THE FINAL SO­LUTION, p. 499).  In re­spect of these Soviet Jews remaining in German ter­ritory, it will be proved later that in the war in Russia no more than one hundred thousand persons were killed by the German Action Groups as partisans and Bolshevik commissars, not all of whom were Jews.  By contrast, the par­tisans themselves claimed to have murdered five times that number of German troops.

 

‘SIX  MILLION’  UNTRUE  ACCORDING  TONEUTRAL  SWISS

 

It is clear, therefore, that the Germans could not possibly have gained control over or extermi­nated anything like six million Jews.  Excluding the Soviet Union, the number of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe after emigration was scarcely more than 3 million, by no means all of whom were in­terned.  To approach the extermination of even half of six million would have meant the liquidation of every Jew living in Europe.  And yet it is known that large numbers of Jews were alive in Europe after 1945.  Philip Friedmann in THEIR BROTHER’S KEEPERS (N.Y., 1957, p. 13), states that “at least a million Jews survived in the very crucible of the Nazi hell”, while the official figure of the Jewish Joint Distribution Committee is 1,559,600.  Thus, even if one ac­cepts the latter estimate, the number of possible wartime Jewish deaths could not have ex­ceeded a limit of one and a half million. Precisely this conclusion was reached by the rep­utable journal BASELER NACHRICHTEN of neutral Switzer­land.  In an article entitled “Wie hoch ist die Zahl der judischen Opfer?”  (“How high is the number of Jewish victims?”, June 13th, 1946), it ex­plained that purely on the basis of the popula­tion and emigration figures described above, a maximum of only one and a half million Jews could be numbered as casualties.  Later on, how­ever, it will be demonstrated conclusively that the number was actually far less, for the Baseler Nachrichten ac­cepted the Joint Distribution Committee’s figure of 1,559,600 sur­vivors after the war, but you shall see that the number of claims for compensation by Jewish survivors is more than dou­ble that figure.  This information was not available to the Swiss in 1946.

 

Let us break at this point so that the segment doesn’t get too lengthy.  I also suggest that you take a break.  Thank you for your service.

 

I only ask that you readers hear us out before your draw conclu­sions.  This is a most important factor in discerning who brings truth and who is controlling your very information resources.  Please read with reason, logic and an open mind for you may be surprised to find that history is frequently warped to meet the needs of “master planners”.  May insight be your gift in this reading and may each be guided by that reason within.  Survival of a planet in freedom rests on your discernment and wisdom.

 

Hatonn to clear, please.  Good-day.

 

http://fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J040.pdf  

March 25, 2011