generated by an Adobe application 12.00

‘THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE – THE HOLOCAUST – VOL II’ – PHOENIX JOURNAL #40 CHAPTER  5

REC  #2    HATONN

SUN., NOV. 10, 1991   11:24 A.M.   YEAR 5, DAY 086

 

NOW  FOR  FUN  WITH  THE  DEAD  SEA  SCROLLS

 

QUOTE from periodical dated Nov. 19, 1991:

 

“FAMED BIBLICAL SCHOLAR REVEALS THE SHOCK­ING SECRETS OF THE ... DEAD SEA SCROLLS”:

 

Passages from the Dead Sea Scrolls that are so secret only a handful of scholars have seen them reveal that UFO’s landed on Earth 2,500 years ago, Jesus will be reborn in 1991 and the world will end 10,000 years from now—in 11,991!  [H: I’d say that there is definitely “good” news and “bad” news regarding this projection but it is actually more valid than the other garbage being thrust upon you.  Most, as usual, depends upon “what you do about the mess you’re in and whether or not you choose to wake up and change the tale.”]

 

That’s the word from biblical scholar and translator Felix Bonjean [H: I expect this is one of “those” scholars for whom Dr. Borg has “no respect”.], who claims to be one of only six men who have examined the passages that have been kept under lock and key at the Vatican since 1949.  [H: VATICAN!?!?  AH, THE PLOT THICKENS, DOES IT NOT???]

 

THE  PASSAGES  ALSO  REVEAL:

 

*     That a fleet of massive, circular starships landed on Earth 2,500 years ago in 500 B.C.  A description of the extraterrestri­als that got off the ships was badly decayed and unreadable, al­though a reference to the fact that they had enormous, bulb-shaped heads survived.

*     What God looks like.  Though the description is sketchy, the scrolls say He has fiery green eyes, flowing brown hair and stands 9 feet tall.

 

*     The rise and fall of a genocidal “antichrist” in the mid-20th century, a likely reference to Adolf Hitler.  The develop­ment of atomic weaponry is also mentioned.  And in another predic­tion the scrolls warn of a horrifying plague in the late 20th century, which seems to be a refer­ence to AIDS.

 

*     The exact location of Noah’s Ark.  Long thought to be buried under tons of rock and on Turkey’s Mount Ararat, it ac­tually came to rest in Egypt—just miles from the Great Pyra­mid.

 

*     That the Messiah will be reborn in 1994.  It is said that He will rise to a position of power and prominence and spearhead a worldwide conversion to true Christianity before 2025.

*     The creation of a worldwide “economy-of-plenty” AND ELIMINATION OF POVERTY IN 1992.

 

*     That Moses wasn’t Jewish, Egyptian or even human.  He came from another planet. [H: No-o-o?]

 

*     That mankind will enjoy 10,000 consecutive years of peace before the world ends in the year 11,991.  [H: Not at the rate you are going!  But let’s see what happens when TRUTH per­vades the lands!]

 

At that time life as we know it will cease to exist while the souls of the “chosen few” will be reborn as life-forms on the Red Planet Mars.  [H: Don’t be so sure that Mars is THE red planet as considered by Earth men.]

 

[H:Here the assumptions cloud the reasoning process of the given word.  You can only “assume” based on what you have been led to “believe” and much of that “assumption” is totally in error.  But this is a neat story and more nearly on target than anything else touted about those scrolls.]

 

*     The discovery of America by an adventurer from the east—Christopher Columbus—in 1492.

 

*     Details of America’s 1969 moon shot, including the inti­ials of the astronauts, N.A. for Neil Armstrong and B.A. for Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin.

 

*     The election of America’s first female president after President George Bush serves out his second term in 1996.  De­scribed as the daughter of a slain former president, the woman in question would appear to be Caroline Kennedy.  [H: And, just when we were beginning to get some “real stuff”.]

 

*     The truth about Atlantis.  The Lost continent was home to a race of superhuman beings that God destroyed because they rejected Him and began to worship the Devil.

 

*     That Satan will literally walk the Earth for six years be­ginning in 2010.  The Evil One will claim and destroy the lives of millions before God banishes him forever.  [H: This hardly seems feasible if item No’s 1 and 3 are correct—but so be it.]

 

*     The devastation of one of the greatest countries on Earth in 1997.  It is not clear where this Godless society is located, but the passage seems to be referring to either China or Amer­ica.

 

“The truth was bound to come out sooner or later and after much agonizing and even more prayer I’ve taken it upon myself to tell mankind what it has a right to know,” said Dr. Bon­jean.

 

“The passages were hidden from the public because the men who have controlled the scrolls since their discovery by a Palestinian shepherd boy in 1947, spoke for many when he criticized Dr. Bonjean for leaking privileged information that was never meant to be seen or heard by ordinary men.”

Other experts, like German archaeologist Ulrike Hoffman, actually praised Dr. Bonjean “for having the integrity and courage to reveal the truth about the scrolls once and for all.”

 

Both the VATICAN AND ISRAELI ANTIQUITIES DE­PARTMENT which oversees the study and publication of the 2,000-year-old scrolls, have been strangely silent on the issue.  But Dr. Bonjean says that’s not surprising “since they can’t say anything about the secret scroll pas­sages without admitting that they’ve been deceiving the public for almost 50 years .”

 

The expert claims to have seen the Vatican’s scroll passages in 1952.  [H: By the way, this checks out, little chelas.]

 

He refused to name the other five men who have seen them [for their privacy and protec­tion—they may do what they wish regarding the matter.  To speak out is an almost sure death sen­tence].

 

But a highly placed Vatican source confirmed that Dr. Bonjean “can, in fact, talk about the passages with unques­tioned authority.

 

“These particular scrolls and passages were brought to the Vatican for safekeeping be­cause it was feared that the contents would cause panic and chaos throughout the world,” contin­ued the source. [H: Reminds me of the meeting we had with Baruch, Eisenhower, etc., and they, too, kept it from you people to prevent religious riots and panic by you-the-people.]

 

“Whether that fear was founded or unfounded will soon become evident, of course, now that Dr. Bonjean has spoken out.”  Dr. Bonjean concluded: “I did what I had to do and I have no regrets.   God will decide if I was right or wrong and nobody can argue with that.”  [H: Want to bet?]

 

END OF QUOTING

 

BACK  TO  OCTOBER  SURPRISE

 

Why do I think it important to look again at the incident called “October Surprise”?  Because a strange thing has happened on the way to Congress.  This is a real hot potato!  This notation is also an October Surprise because of political implications.  The Senate Foreign Relations Committee narrowly approved a reso­lution calling for an investigation into the October Sur­prise scandal—they almost got it past you-the-people and yet, all the reasons are wrong.  Watch the rest of this little notation.  This is the little scandal in which members of the Rea­gan-Bush cam­paign team arranged for Iranian radicals to delay the release of American hostages until AF­TER THE 1980 ELECTION.  But Sen. Richard Lugar called the probe a “monstrosity” and promised a filibuster to prevent passage on the floor of the Senate.  On the other side of the aisle, Sen. Christopher Dodd voted against the resolution because it included an amendment TO INVESTI­GATE CARTER ADMINISTRATION OFFI­CIALS.  Does anyone other than me see “dirty pool” in ac­tion???  Again, watch for the flame when you see so much smoke.

 

BAKER  CONFIRMS  ISRAELI  DEAL

 

Do you remember a bit of argument over arms and sanctions, invasions and “storms” over Iraq and Kuwait?  Well, isn’t it nice to know that the good old U.S.A. is “always right on target for fairness, honor and justice?”  Secretary of State James Baker admits the Bush administra­tion decided NOT TO PLACE ANY ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AGAINST ISRAEL FOR ILLE­GALLY EXPORTING BANNED MISSILE TECHNOLOGY TO SOUTH AFRICA, DE­SPITE ISRAEL’S FOUR-YEAR-OLD PROMISE NOT TO DO SO.  [H: By the way, goodly citizens, SANCTIONS ARE REQUIRED BY LAW.]  How­ever, in the name of “justice” the South African company which got the data, Armscor, will be banned from U.S. trade for two years.  [I thought the business was done in Israel?  Is there no longer any sepa­ration at all from Israel?  Nope!]  BAKER RE­FUSED TO SAY WHY ISRAEL GOT THE SPECIAL TREATMENT!

 

NEW  INPUT  ON  FIRST  AMENDMENT  RIGHTS

 

I am going to quote this next segment but I want you to know that the first two statements are not factual.

“You can debate the existence of God; you can debate any aspect of sexual performance or non-performance.  You can talk about almost anything under the protection of the First Amend­ment.  But you can’t even SUGGEST THE SUBJECT OF THE “HOLOCAUST” IS DE­BATABLE.  Historian Bradley Smith paid for a full page ad in the University of Michigan news­paper titled: The Holocaust Controversy: The Case for Open Debate.  Zionists became apoplectic.  The next day the newspaper was forced to apologize for running a paid ad which only “suggested that the `holocaust’ was a subject open for de­bate.”  Forget the First Amend­ment if the subject is not “politically correct”.

 

Well, hang in there because I am going to “Prove” that the “holocaust” did not happen as you have been told.  It was a Zionist/Nazi plot to take out the Jews and enemies of the Zionist plan­ners—that same group which is destroying your rights under your Constitutional Bill of Rights.

 

You think this cannot be and that there is “more to it”?  No—you had better pay attention be­cause  such denial is already illegal in France, Germany, England and some other European nations as well as in the Soviet Union and “publicly” in Canada.

 

Scholars in the United States, for instance, who simply suggest that the subject be more care­fully investigated because statistics and records simply do not balance, are threatened with death and beatings—and have received both.  And, on July 4, 1984, a major Historical Institute which was looking into the matters, the Institute for Historical Review (California) was burnt to the ground for their pioneering work in honest scholarship.  Their purpose, worse yet, was to prove that there was a “holocaust” to coincide with the Jewish claims.  Do you not find this interest­ing?

 

UNPLEASANT TASK—POPULIST PARTY CONFUSION

 

STOP, HALT, ALTO, FREEZE AND CEASE AND DESIST WITH YOUR BASHING HA­TONN ABOUT JAMES GRITZ AND HIS CONNECTION WITH THE “NOTORIOUS” (HARDLY KNOWN) POPULIST PARTY.  I HAPPEN TO KNOW THAT COL. GRITZ IS IN VIEW OF THE PROBLEM AND IS “SHUCKING CORN” IN THE MATTER.  Why think ye that “I” have anything to do with political parties???  If I “could” I assure you, I wouldn’t!

 

I will, however, reprint herein what the SPOTLIGHT has just published about the matter and leave it to you.  This is WHY all the sudden controversy and somehow you seem to think that “Hatonn” and “Space-Command” seem to have the reins in hand—I personally wouldn’t get within 10 feet of the horses, much less pull the reins.  This is exactly, however, what hap­pens with good candidates who are willing to “serve”.  They only have choices which are bad at best.  What have YOU done to get a platform and support under this willing servant?  I thought not—YOU would rather complain and nag—and point fingers.

 

I am “dared”, yet, to print the write-up.  Oh, I have been “dared” on much more interesting sub­stance but perhaps it will help you to at least know what is being said—truth has nothing to do with it at this point—as usual.

 

POPULIST  CANDIDATE  NOT  ON  BALLOTS

 

QUOTE, SPOTLIGHT, Nov. 11, 1991.

 

According to the October 16 issue of Ballot Access News (BAN), Populist Party National Di­rector Don Wassall, a Ford City, Pennsylvania promoter, has yet to qualify his party’s presiden­tial candidate, Lt. Col. James (“Bo”) Gritz, for even a single state ballot.

 

This despite the fact that more than an entire year ago—the period of April through Octo­ber, 1990—there were fully 17 states where ballot access efforts could have been undertaken well in advance for the 1992 election.

 

Those states were: Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Hawaii, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah and Vermont.

 

In fact, according to BAN there are only two states where there are visible ongoing efforts to qualify the Populist Party for the ballot: Georgia and Maryland.

 

Ironically, one of the leaders of the Georgia ballot access ef­fort, Jim Yarbrough of Gainesville, has been officially “expelled” from the Populist Party by Wassall.

 

And in Maryland, State Chairman Boyd Godlove has emerged as one of Wassall’s leading critics.

 

In 36 other states where petitioning could be under way to put Gritz on the ballot, there is no activity of any consequence noted.

 

This includes Arizona, Florida and Missouri, home states of top-level Wassall associates, party parliamentarian Bill Chandler, party money handler, Phil Chesler and executive com­mittee member Jeff Wilderson who is Wassall’s handpicked ballot qualification “expert”.

 

According to BAN, not a single petition signature has been obtained in those key states.

 

In stark contrast, the Libertarian Party’s presidential candi­date, former Alaska state legisla­tor Andre Marrou, is already on the ballot in 20 states for the 1992 presidential election.

In seven other states, the Libertarians have either finished collecting the required number of petition signatures or are in the process of so doing.

 

According to BAN, there are only 10 states where the Liber­tarian Party has failed—as of this time—to seek ballot status.

 

(There are 12 states where state restrictions prohibit collec­tion of petition signatures prior to a specified date.)

These figures are shocking, to say the least, when one con­siders the amount of money that has poured into Wassall’s cof­fers since the beginning of 1990 alone.

 

In 1990 Wassall controlled $219,215.94 in the party bank ac­count.  He spent $192,683.46 of that amount.  Only a tiny per­centage of those funds was expended for the purpose of ob­taining ballot access.

 

What’s more, Wassall gave only a piddling $10,023—less than 4.6 percent of the total—to Populist Party candidates, forc­ing 23 people running in seven states to divide the sum among themselves.

 

In 1991, according to Wassall’s July 15 filing with the Fed­eral Election Commission (FEC), Wassall’s Ford City office bank account had expended a whopping sum of $97,169.94.

 

Of that amount, $11,179.50 was paid to Wassall in salary.  (Wassall’s salary, hiked repeat­edly, skyrocketed to a total of $34,000 per year. [H: Mr. Iococca, eat your heart out!])  Wassall also picked up an additional $1,713.95 in “petty cash reimbursement”.  [H: Now chelas, bashing is one thing but malicious bashing is so evident herein that I am embar­rassed to continue printing this.  Do you realize that Congress voted themselves a raise in the middle of the night which averaged more than this amount any way you scrape it out of the garbage pail?]

 

Party Treasurer Phil Chesler received $3,821.77; and a woman in his employ, Betty Losh, re­ceived $3,549.49—for a combined total of $7,371.26.  [H: This would seem to average out to about a skyrocket amount of some 56 cents per hour.] (Other, previous party treasurers were committed Populists, volunteers who served without compensation.)

 

Wassall also spent $622.58 for magazine subscriptions, even including a $234 subscription to the New York Times.

 

 

A total of $1,468.95 in payments was made toward a vehicle purchased in the party’s name.

 

Since these filings with the FEC, Wassall has mailed out a barrage of fund-raising letters using the name of Gritz.  How­ever, there has never been a nominating convention for Gritz, and even Wassall’s so-called national committee itself is without standing, not having followed the bylaws of the party formulated before he took control.

 

However, Wassall has raised a great deal of money through the use of Gritz’s name and Gritz’s mailing list.

UTAH  DEBACLE

 

The sum of $937.15 in salary and expenses was paid to Was­sall’s “aide”, young Harry Bertram, who engaged in what to date was the first, last and only known ballot access effort un­dertaken by Wassall.  This was in the state of Utah.

 

There, according to a headline story published in the April 5 edition of the Salt Lake City Tribune, Bertram was nabbed forging signatures on ballot access petitions.

 

According to the Tribune, Wassall’s protege was “caught in what election officials say is a poorly executed scam involving the alleged forgeries of hundreds of signatures of registered vot­ers” in the state of Utah.

 

At the time the Tribune reported the Salt Lake County attor­ney was conducting a criminal investigation and that an indict­ment was expected.  A county attorney was quoted as saying that, “There is clear evidence of a crime committed.”

 

Although Wassall was quoted in the Tribune as having said Bertram had “bamboozled” the party, Wassall has since wel­comed Bertram back into the party, despite his alleged criminal ac­tivity, and has lavished praise on the accused forger in the pages of his monthly organ, The Pop­ulist Observer.

 

Wassall has never reported Bertram’s malfeasance in the Ob­server.

 

Ironically, Van Loman, then a member of the party’s execu­tive committee, had warned Was­sall against hiring Bertram as the party’s national coordinator.

 

Wassall has since begun sending out letters viciously attack­ing Loman, whom many consid­ered Wassall’s brainiest adviser on the party’s national executive committee.

 

Despite Loman’s words of caution, Wassall apparently wanted to prove to his many critics that he was actually engaged in ballot access efforts (rather than running a fund-raising opera­tion) and brought Bertram aboard, only to become enmeshed in the scandal.

 

Rather than focusing on getting the party on the ballot, Was­sall has been busy arranging a $20 million libel suit against The SPOTLIGHT [H: The truth begins to hit the fan, does it not?] for exposing his activity—and inactivity.

 

Two of Wassall’s complaints are that he was labeled a “political Nerd” and a “yo-yo.”  He claims he’s neither....

 

This article is by Michael Collins Piper.

 

END QUOTING

 

YOU  DEMAND  MY  COMMENT!

Why?  Is not your own discernment worthy of thought conclu­sion?

 

But I WILL COMMENT (You trusting souls knew I would!).

 

This is the kind of slime-suckers that will try at every turn to keep the Establishment and Elite in POWER!  You have just witnessed the FACT that even though the SPOTLIGHT gives some valid input—it is basically an Establishment run paper which only gives a bit of truth and then, af­ter sucking you in—deceives you by intent.  It is clear that: No. 1: the SPOTLIGHT doesn’t want Bo Gritz to run for anything and will do ANY­THING to prevent it.  Mr. Wassall has no real part in the issue at all.  No. 2: Mr. Piper is a poison pen tool and the accusations so shal­low as to kill a fish.

 

Neither of these points are of any lasting value to the issue.  The point is that unless there is re­vamping from top to bottom, the Populist Party is the sure way to lose an election and keep Gritz useless to your nation.  Whether the accusations be true or false is of no point herein—the “planks” of the political “platform” of the “party in point” are actually little more Constitu­tional in ori­entation than are the already “in power” parties.

 

I have been asked about platforms and “planks”, etc., and I frankly denounce anything based on ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE U.S.A. WHICH PRO­TECTS (NOT “GIVES”) YOU YOUR SOVEREIGN RIGHTS AND BRINGS THE GOVERN­MENT INTO CONTROL—YOUR CONTROL!  THIS PROJECTION IS BASED SECOND IN IMPORTANCE—FOR YOU WILL COME BACK TO “ONE NATION UNDER GOD” OR YOU AREN’T GOING TO MAKE IT ANYWAY.

 

When you ones start serving God within His laws and the rules laid down for a chosen nation under that God—then, and only then, will reclamation be possible.  God will provide the way and the leader—but YOU will take the journey.  Is James Gritz perfect?  Gracious, you jest!  Of course he is not perfection—but didn’t anyone ever tell you that NOTHING SHORT OF GOD IS PERFECTION?  His intent is perfection and THAT, sirs and madams, is what is im­portant.  You have boggled your election systems to the point that you can hardly get anyone ON the bal­lot to be in the elections—it is THE way to control you and who will be your King—didn’t you know?

 

What about the Populist Party and thus and so?  I see that it is probably without any salvation—there are too many skeletons over which bones can be picked—even though they be wasted bones.  If you tout ANYTHING other than a return to Constitu­tional truth and law, you will be debased, denounced, picked and kicked—AND FEW MEN CAN TAKE IT!  IF YOU CAN­NOT BE DESTROYED BY THE PRESS THEN THEY WILL COME WITH GUNS.  Well, I wouldn’t count to readily on the “guns” working with this particular Colonel.  God fa­vors this particular “little soldier” and it is a bit hard to “bump off” that which is favored by God.  Ponder it.  The Col. already has some rather interesting uniforms in his collection wherein you will find a bullet hole which enters and exits the cloth—but what of the man who was wearing the uni­form??  I think I would think upon that little “magic” also.  You of Earth don’t seem to under­stand “God” and who or what is God.

 

DON’T BE FOOLED BY THE SUBJECT OF “HOLOCAUST” AND SPOTLIGHT, OR YOU SHALL BE GREATLY FOOLED INDEED!  IF ONES CAN CONTROL THE PRESS, THE MEDIA, THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESSES AND THE INFORMATION—THEY CAN RULE THE WORLD!  WHERE ARE YOU NOW, WORLD?

 

I repeat again and again—read with discernment.  I did NOT say, stop reading—most especially the SPOTLIGHT for their thrust is to give you lots of “trust me” information.  Always mea­sure that which is given against the Laws of God and The Creation and see how Truth stacks up.  They do give you much very valid and unprinted “elsewhere” information.  It is up to you to discern with care.

 

Well, why do they tell such awful things about the administra­tion and the Government, etc.?  Because they want their own people to eventually be in the slots of Government and it must APPEAR that they are ON YOUR SIDE!  This is the VERY REASON we have no interest in “overthrowing” any Govern­ment as you understand revolutions to be.  It will do no good to sim­ply “overthrow” the power in power because the REAL POWER is NOT in those places.

 

We have gone on much too long today but it seems so impossi­ble to get all the information out and into your hands.  Please be patient as we effort to get through these myriads of inquiries and comments—we take none as invalid questions and none are ever mundane or inappropriate if asked in intent for knowledge.  There are no silly questions—only silly people—you must dis­cern which is being utilized when you write and never assume you must ask a question “for” another for it may well be only your perception and that becomes most ungracious.  I look forward each day to the responses and inquiries as you send them along—most are “direct” to me, hundreds are through Dharma regard­ing our writings.  We treasure each and every one—even those which would appear negative and bitter.  Those are the very ones which allow us perception more clearly than almost any other.  I am most saddened, however, by the ones who “hit and run”.  If you “hit” that is fine—but to run that you might avoid confronting the response—is quite foolish on your own part.  Wisdom can only be gained by coming into KNOWLEDGE re­garding those things which are at present misperceived or are correct.  You cannot know either until you know both sides of the issue in point. 

 

Thank you for your service and your attention.

 

Hatonn to clear, please.

 

http://fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J040.pdf  

 

March 21, 2011