generated by an Adobe application 12.00

‘THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE – THE HOLOCAUST’ – PHOENIX JOURNAL #39 -CHAPTER  7 

REC  #1    HATONN

TUE., NOVEMBER 5, 1991   7:55 A.M.   YEAR 5, DAY 081

TUESDAY,  NOVEMBER 5,  1991

TODAY’S  WATCH

POW’s  AND  MIA’s

 

I urge you to keep your eye on CHENEY.  The government is now going to increase the lies about “interest” in the MIA’s and POW’s in the Asian sector.  Brothers, there are many still alive and it is up to you-the-people if they remain alive.  Some were shifted and some were liter­ally “buried” at this last charade of Kerrey going to check on them.  The point of that visit was to set up business (trade and banking) arrangements with your old enemies—NOT TO GET PRISONERS.  The deception worked—note the hopping on the bandwagon and “unification” of Viet­nam and the Koreas.  This will be under “communist” control with your Elite bankers in charge.

 

MARCOS  RETURNS  TO  PHILIPPINES

 

THIS is important!  To you who wait for unveiling of intent, I can assure you that this is most important.  I have no interest in the leaders of any country except as they impact God’s reclama­tion; however, if your “world government” wanted to bring down the Marcoses so badly—they must have been doing “something” right.  They were cruel and perfunctory to Imelda and out­right “murdered” Ferdinand.  As “ruler” of the area there was, of course, mis­use of funds in the name of greed and power—HOWEVER, the major funds of these people DID NOT come from the nation’s resources but from an altogether differ­ent and unassociated source.  YOU ARE NOT POPULAR IN THE PHILIPPINES!  The Elite have tried every known method available to extract that wealth from that location—AND THEY HAVE FAILED!  THIS IS ALL THE MORE WONDROUS TO WE WHO AWAIT GOD’S PLAN TO UNFOLD.  SO BE IT.  Yes­terday was “Champagne” day and you missed it.

 

JEWDOM

 

Now that we have established that all people, except the Zion­ists, are “Jews”, I hope you will stand by before you have a to­tal breakdown.  Many of you are also Semites—but the Zionists and self-styled so-called Jews, ARE NOT.  Once again, you are going to have to FACE FACTS for FACTS ARE FACTS and pronouncing them otherwise means zilch.

 

LET’S  LOOK  BACK  AT  “JESUS”

 

I am not going to repeat and repeat that which has already been given in detail, but I will briefly remind you of prior writings which have come forth from scholars and historians, most espe­cially Benjamin H. Freedman in his writings to Dr. David Gold­stein, LL.D., dated Octo­ber 10, 1954:

 

....Without any fear of contradiction based upon fact the most competent and best qualified authorities all agree today that Je­sus Christ (Emmanuel) was not a so-called or self-styled “Jew”.  They now confirm that during His lifetime Jesus was known as a “Judean” and not as a “Jew”, and that Jesus referred to Himself as a “Judean” and never as a “Jew”.  Dur­ing His lifetime here on earth Jesus was referred to by contemporary historians as a “Judean” and not as a “Jew”.  Contemporary theologians of Jesus whose competence to pass upon this sub­ject cannot be challenged by anyone today also referred to Je­sus during His lifetime here on earth as a “Judean” and not as a “Jew”.

 

Neither did the inscription on the cross nor the attitude of “King of the Jews” ever appear or was ever entertained by anyone in the time period of Pontius Pilate or Emmanuel.

 

 

 

SUIT  A  NEED

 

I will remind you  “...officially or personally the inhabitants of Judea were “Judeans” to Pon­tius Pi­late and not so-called “Jews” as they have been styled since the 18th Century.”

 

“JEW”  APPEARED  ONLY  AFTER  THE  1700’s

 

“....As you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, the best known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims (Douai) Edition and the King James Authorized Edition.  The Rheims (Douai) translation of the New Testament into English was first printed in 1582 but the word “Jew” did NOT AP­PEAR IN IT.  The King James Authorized translation of the New Testament into En­glish was begun in 1604 and first pub­lished in 1611.  THE WORD “JEW” DID NOT APPEAR IN IT EITHER.  THE WORD “JEW” APPEARED IN BOTH THESE WELL KNOWN EDITIONS IN THEIR 18TH CEN­TURY **REVISED** VERSION FOR THE **FIRST TIME**”

 

EXPLANATION  OF  THE  USE  OF  “JEW”

 

“...Countless copies of the revised 18th century editions of the Rheims (Douai) and the King James translations of the New Testament into English were distributed to the clergy and the laity through­out the English speaking world.  They did not know the history of the origin of the English word “Jew” nor did they care.  They accepted the English word “Jew” as the only and as the accepted form of the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios”.  How could they be ex­pected to have known oth­erwise?  The answer is they could not and they did not.  It was a NEW English word to them.”

 

SO  HOW  DID  “THEY”  GET  BY  WITH  IT?

 

Easy: When (and IF) you studied Latin in your school days you were taught that the letter “I” in Latin when used as the first letter in a word is pronounced like the letter “Y” in English when it is the first letter in words like “yes”, “you”, “youth” and “yacht”.  The “I” in “Iudaeus” is pro­nounced like the “Y” in “yes” and “You”, “youth, and “yacht” in English.  Are you beginning to see that now that you are a “Jew” you are simply “YOU”?  Yes indeed, I certainly most surely do recognize that you feel badly “had”.

 

HANDY  FOR  THE  ZIONISTS/KHAZARS

 

The present pronunciation of the word “Jew” in modern English is a development of recent times.  In the English language of to­day the “J” in “Jew” is pronounced like the “J” in the En­glish word “justice”, “jolly”, and “jump”—which does in no wise make it “correct”.  THIS IS THE CASE ONLY SINCE THE 18TH CENTURY.  Prior to the 18th century the “J” in “Jew” was pronounced exactly like the “Y” in the English “yes”, “you”, “youth”, and “yacht”.  Until the 18th century and perhaps even “later” than the 18th century the word “Jews” in English was pronounced like “hews” or “youse”.  The NEW pronunciation was established by the Khazarian Zionists to fit into their particular needs of establishing a non-ex­istent foundation for the NEW WORLD OR­DER.  THE PRESENT WORD “JEW” WAS ES­TABLISHED/ACQUIRED ONLY AFTER THE 18TH CENTURY.

 

ISRAEL  ESTABLISHED

 

Even more briefly—ISRAEL WAS ESTABLISHED BY THE UNITED NATIONS CONSIST­ING OF THE SOVIET UNION, THE UNITED STATES, GREAT BRITAIN, FRANCE AND CHINA.  IN 1948!  This hardly seems an “ancient” holy mandate to steal land and slaughter people who lived upon that land for thousands of years.  It was simply the act of the U.S., Great Britain and the Soviets that the State of Israel was established and PRO­NOUNCED INTO EXISTENCE.

 

CARETAKERS  OF  ISRAEL

 

Since the major role was played by the Elite Khazars who had moved into the U.S. following the Bolshevik Revolution, it (Israel)  became the orphan-adopted “child” of the U.S.  The word “israel” is a very simple small-letter word meaning “chosen”.  “I”srael means NOTH­ING.   It means no more than if you decided to call the United States—”Horse”.  Believe me, dear ones, in the rest of the world the U.S. is often referred to as such, i.e., “Horse’s Ass-ettes” and more specifically—”Little Israel”.  By the way—the original word “Jew” is still pro­nounced “you” in al­most all other countries.

 

Emmanuel was referred to as a “iewe” (“hew-wee”) in the sin­gular and as “One of the `iewes’”.  That was the 14th century version of the Latin “Iudaeus” and was pronounced as “hew-weeze” in the plural, and “iewe” in the singular.  By the way His name was Esu Em­manuel—often called Isa or Iisa which is pronounced as “E”su.

 

MORE  HISTORY  ABOUT  “JEW”

 

If the generally accepted understanding today of the English “Jew” and “Judean” conveyed the identical implications, infer­ences and innuendoes as both rightly should, it would make no dif­ference which of these two words was used when referring to Emmanuel (Jesus-”Yeesus”) in that book called the New Testa­ment or elsewhere.  But the implications, inferences, and innu­endoes today conveyed by these two words are as different as black is from white.  The word “Jew” today is never re­garded as a synonym for “Judean” nor is “Judean” regarded as a syn­onym for “Jew”.

 

As I have explained, when the word “Jew” was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was quite possibly “Judean”.  However, during the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well-fi­nanced international “pressure group” created a so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” among the English-speaking peoples of the world.  This so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” bears NO RE­LATION WHATSOEVER TO THE 18TH CEN­TURY ORIGINAL CONNOTATION OF THE WORD.  IT IS A MISREPRESENTATION.

 

The “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” today bears a mis­representation and as little rela­tion to its original and correct meaning as the “secondary meaning” today for the word “camel” bears to the original and correct meaning of the word “camel” or the “secondary meaning” today for the word “ivory” bears to the original and correct meaning of the word “ivory”.  The “secondary meaning” today for the word “camel” is a cigarette by that name but its original and correct meaning is a desert animal by that ancient name.  The “secondary meaning” of the word “ivory” today is a piece of soap but its original and correct meaning is the tusk of a male ele­phant.

 

The “secondary meanings” of words often become the generally “accepted” meanings of words formerly having entirely differ­ent meanings.  This is accomplished by the expenditure of great amounts of money for well-planned publicity.  Today if you ask for a “camel” someone will hand you a cigarette by that name.  Today if you ask for a piece of “ivory” someone will hand you a piece of soap by that name.  I doubt you will ever receive either a desert animal or a male elephant tusk.  Perhaps this illustrates the extent to which these “secondary meanings” are able to eclipse the original and possibly cor­rect meanings of words in the MINDS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC.  The “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” today has totally eclipsed the original and correct meaning of the word and no longer even bears the correct pronunciation—that is NOT AN ACCIDENT.  THIS WAS A TERM TAKEN (STOLEN, AS IS THE USUAL PROCEDURE OF THESE ONES) BY THE KHAZARIAN ZIONISTS TO SUIT A NEED FOR FUL­FILLING DECEPTION OF A POP­ULATION WHEREBY THEY CAN CONTROL YOU THROUGH THAT DECEIT.

 

The United States Supreme Court has recognized the “secondary meaning” of many words.  The highest court in the land has es­tablished as basic law that “secondary meanings” CAN ac­quire priority rights to the use of any dictionary word.  Well-planned and well-financed world-wide publicity through every avail­able controlled media by well-organized groups of so-called or self-styled “Jews” for three centuries has created a “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” which HAS COM­PLETELY “BLACKED OUT” THE ORIGINAL AND COR­RECT MEANING OF THE WORD.  THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT IT !

 

There is not a person in the whole English-speaking world today who regards a “Jew” as a “Judean” in the literal sense of the word.  That was the correct and only meaning in the 18th cen­tury.  The generally accepted “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” today, with practi­cally no exceptions, is made up of four almost universally-believed theories.  These four theo­ries are that a so-called or self-styled “Jew” is (1) a person who today professes the form of religious wor­ship known as “Judaism”, (2) a person who claims to belong to a racial group as­sociated with the ancient “Semites” (but are NOT), (3) a person directly the descendant of an ancient nation which thrived in Palestine in Bible history and (4) a person blessed by Divine intentional de­sign with certain superior cultural characteristics denied to other racial, religious or national groups, all rolled into one.

 

Since my thrust this day is NOT to give you a religious lecture but only to identify terminol­ogy, I will leave this portion of ex­planation.

 

I trust it is clear to you that the whole truth has been greatly tampered with and you are now almost inclusively “people of the lie”.  You accept that which is told to you without ques­tion and march to the drummer’s beat as instructed—RIGHT OR WRONG—for if a thing is seen and heard enough, it becomes the accepted.

 

The following is going to be lengthy and tedious, as will more upcoming documentation to the facts, but we are going to type it in full.  I thank my precious friend in Hawaii, P.M., for sending these Congressional Research Service documents.  The first in point is a CRS Issue Brief: IS­RAEL: U.S. FOREIGN ASSIS­TANCE FACTS.  Updated September 4, 1991, For­eign Affairs and National Defense Division.  It can be obtained from the Li­brary of Congress, Order Code IB85066.  Yes, I am also pleased to note that you will find I have previously given you this in­formation and it is accurate—that which we have printed.  The facts herein will be soft-pedalled as much as possible and still, you should get a real shocker.  This docu­ment in point was only re­ceived on the yesterday (11-4-91).  Thank you.  Much of the empha­sis will be of our doing for the report is required to have no appearance of “bias”.  (See tables at end of chapter)

 

ISRAEL:  U.S.  FOREIGN  ASSISTANCE

FACTS  SUMMARY

QUOTE:

 

Israel is not economically self-sufficient, and relies upon foreign assistance and bor­rowing to maintain its economy.  For the past five years, the United States has provided $3 billion in grants annually to Israel.  Since 1976, Israel has been the largest annual re­cipient of U.S. for­eign assistance, and is the largest cumulative recipient.  In addition to U.S. as­sistance, it is esti­mated that Israel receives about $1 billion an­nually through philanthropy, an equal amount through short- and long-term commercial loans, and about $500 million or more in Israel Bonds proceeds.

 

Should the United States set conditions on its aid to Israel to extract political or economic concessions?  Does the special treatment granted to Israel set precedents for other U.S. recipi­ents?  Are the charges that Israel has misused U.S. aid valid, and if so, what should the United States do about it?  Should the United States increase aid to Israel to help resettle Jews emi­grating from the Soviet Union?

 

The United States provided $1.2 billion in Economic Support Fund grants, $1.8 billion in Foreign Military Sales grants, $45 million in refugee resettlement grants, $400 million in housing loan guarantees, $700 million in surplus weapons withdrawn from Europe, $650 mil­lion in sup­plemental emergency ESF, and $7.5 million in cooperative development grants for Israel for FY1991.

 

According to Israeli press reports, Israel seeks $10 billion in housing loan guarantees over 5 years to settle Soviet Jews in Is­rael.

 

ISSUE  DEFINITION

 

For most members of Congress, the issue is not if Israel should receive U.S. foreign assis­tance, but under what condi­tions Israel should receive the aid.  Should the United States at­tach conditions to its foreign aid to get Israel to cooperate with the peace process or to stop building settlements in the occupied territories?  Should the United States increase aid to Israel for set­tling Soviet, Ethiopian, and other Jewish refugees?  Should Israel continue to receive preferen­tial treatment?

 

BACKGROUND  AND  ANALYSIS,  COUNTRY  DATA

 

Country data were taken from the following sources: Agency for International Develop­ment, A.I.D. Congressional Presenta­tion FY1987; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, The World Factbook 1985; U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Foreign Eco­nomic Trends, August 1985; and the CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS OF ISRAEL:

 

Population: (’90) 4.777 million (CBS)

Population growth rate: (’89) 1.8%, (’90) 3.0 (FET)

GNP: (’88) $40.7 billion, (’89) $42.7 billion (FET)

Per capita GNP: (’89) $9,460.4 (FET)

Annual per capita GNP growth rate/long term: (’65-’86):2.6%

Annual GNP growth rate/short term: (’88) 0.7%, (’89) 2.8% (FET)

Annual inflation rate/long term: (’70-’82 52.3%

Annual inflation rate/short term: ’82-132%, ’83-191%, ’84-445%, ’85-183%, ’86-19.7%, ’87-16.1%, ’88-16.4%, ’89-20.7%  [H: How much money do the banks “give” you with stats of money-management like these?]

Unemployment rate: (’84) 5.9%, (’85) 6.7%, (’86) 7.4%, (’87) 6.1%, (’88) 6.4%, (’89) 8.9%, (’90) 9.3% 

[H: Who is going to pay back all those “loans” and in­terest, etc?]

Avg. life expectancy: (’89) 76.7 yrs. (A.I.D.)

International debt: (’89) $23.664 billion (FET)

Debt service payments as a percent of exports: (’89) 41.6% [H: But this is paid from new monies given them by YOU.]

Avg. per capita growth rate of agricultural production: (’74-’83) 0.0%

Proportion of the labor force in agriculture: (’82) 5.6%, (’87) 5.2% (CBS)  [H: How do you get them back on the farm after they’ve seen Paree’?—and had all bills and ex­penses paid for them?]

Major crops: Wheat, citrus fruit

Merchandise exports: (’89) $10,335 billion (FET) [Arms, ammunition and war toys comprise the National Product and exports.]

Merchandise imports: (’89) $12,737 billion (FET)

 

PROGRAM  BACKGROUND

Since 1976, Israel has been the largest annual recipient of U.S. aid and is the largest recipi­ent of cumulative U.S. assis­tance.  From 1949 through 1965, U.S. aid to Israel averaged about $63 million per year, over 95% of which was economic development assistance and food aid.  A modest military loan program began in 1959.

 

From 1966 through 1970, average aid per year increased to about $102 million, but mili­tary loans increased to about 47% of the total.  From 1971 to the present, U.S. aid to Israel has av­eraged over $2 billion per year, two-thirds of which has been military assistance.  Congress first designated a specific amount of aid for Israel (“earmark”) in 1971.  Also in 1971, economic assis­tance changed from specific programs, such as agricultural development, to the Commodity Im­port Program (CIP) for pur­chase of U.S. goods.  CIP ended in 1979, re­placed by largely uncon­ditional direct transfers for budgetary support.  The 1974 emergency aid for Israel, following the 1973 war, included the first military grant aid.  Economic aid be­came all grant cash transfer in 1981, and military aid became all grant in 1985.

 

The FY1991 U.S. aid of $3.0 billion in grants was made available to Israel in October 1990; $1.2 billion in Economic Support Funds (ESF) grants ($200 million of which may be spent for military purposes despite laws to the contrary), and $1.8 billion in Foreign Military Sales (FMS) grants (of which $150 million may be spent in the United States for research and development (R&D) for advanced aircraft and $475 million may be spent in Israel for defense procurement).  U.S. aid to Israel is made available in lump sum in October TO ALLOW IS­RAEL TO INVEST THE FUNDS IN INTEREST-PRODUC­ING U.S. GOVERNMENT SE­CURITIES.  Israel also re­ceived $700 million in defense articles to be withdrawn from Europe,  an increase of $100 million (up to $200 million) in the military stockpile in Israel, $650 million in emergency ESF grants, a $400 million loan guarantee for housing for Soviet refugees, a grant of $7.5 million for its foreign as­sistance pro­gram, a $45 million grant for refugee resettlement, and shares a $7 million program with Egypt for cooperative development programs to promote the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty.

 

Beginning in the mid-1970’s, Israel could no longer meet its balance of payments and gov­ernment deficits with imported capital (gifts from overseas “Jews”, West German repa­rations and U.S. “aid”) and began to rely more on “borrowed” capital.  Growing debt ser­vicing costs, mounting government social services expenditures, perennial high defense spending levels, and a stagnant domestic economy combined with world­wide inflation and de­clining foreign markets for Israeli goods pushed the Israeli economy into a near crisis situa­tion.  The “unity” government, which took office in September 1984, in­stituted a series of “preliminary steps” intended to re­solve some of the economic problems and “emergency” mea­sures in July 1985, to cut govern­ment subsidies, freeze wages and prices, raise taxes, and other measures.  Inflation was cut from the high of 445% in 1984 to an annual level of 20% for 1986 and 1987.  Unemployment settled down to 5.5% for the second quarter of 1987, after a high of 7.8% for the same period in 1985.  By 1990, unemployment had climbed over 9% and inflation re­mained in the 20% per year range.  Israel still runs government deficits and balance of trade and payments deficits, although the gaps have been reduced.  [H: And where will jobs come from for all those influxing pilgrims into the occupied territories where YOU are building all those nice housing develop­ments?]

 

Please allow us a rest break.  Hatonn to stand-by until you are ready to continue.  Thank you.

SEE  CHARTS  NEXT  2  PAGES

Feb. 21, 2011

fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J039.pdf