- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search


Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

Sept. 17, 2015













This is a comment to a local newspaper about a California school district near me.


Low vaccination rates, little response

Read the following websites and you will discover that this is part of a plan developed 35 years ago by the CDC/HHS/IOM/vaccine makers/pharma:

-The U.S. National Vaccine Plan http://www.hhs(dot)gov/nvpo/vacc_plan/ and one of it’s primary implementers is a group called: NAACHO which stands for: The National Association of County and City Health Officials.-https://medium (dot) com/@sb442no/what-s-naccho-got-to-do-with-oregon-s-vaccine-exemption-fight-87b16c7c0c77. A group of Oregonians decided to investigate the forces & money involved in their fight to defeat the passage Senate Bill 442, removal of parental rights and mandatory vaccination for children in Oregon, which was withdrawn. What they found was a long term plan to implemented by NAACHO- which sounds like a federal group but it's not. After looking at NACCHO's financial records it was discovered it's a front group funded by the CDC. In essence, it's a lobbying group. It's membership includes 2,700 local health departments across the country. You can probably find them in every state.

In July 2011 NACCHO issued a very clear policy statement that the time had come for states to eliminate personal belief exemptions: In July 2013, NACCHO’s Board approved this new policy statement, titled “An Immunization Program for all Stages of Life”. It includes to work in conjunction by lobbying heavily state legislators to remove all exemptions-medical, religious and philosophical. In the body of their policy statement is the following: the creation of a comprehensive national immunization program that addresses all stages of life (CRADLE to GRAVE) with the intention of achieving the Healthy People 2020 immunization goals and standards.

Healthy People guidelines was initiated 35 years ago as a government program under Health Human Services. It has been updated on a regular basis and today is know as Healthy People 2020. It's goal is the implementation of the U.S. National Vaccine Plan. (dot) pdf

Shot version:

Mandatory vaccines for children up to the age of 18. Children in the US receive 49 DOSES OF 14 VACCINES BEFORE AGE 6. 69 DOSES OF 16 VACCINES BY AGE 18. After completion of the childhood vaccinations what will kick in at age 19 is the Adult immunization plan: CDC recommends 72 vaccinations between the ages of 19 and 65. http://www.cdc (dot) gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-schedule.PDF.

The Adult plan spans age range 19-65 . Currently there are 300 new vaccines in the developmental pipeline: 2013 report of Pharma. http://www.phrma (dot) org/sites/default/files/pdf/Vaccines_2013.pdf

If you are interested in how this inform came to light: Healthy 2020 with Dr Sherri Tenpenny for #b1less NEWS #CDCwhistleblower - (dot) com/watch?v=oBdH2VQwxfM. Link below has all the links to all the government documents. http://drtenpenny (dot) com/2015/03/09/healthy-people-2020-and-the-decade-of-vaccines/.

Trolls will jump on this and began their Sherri Tenpenny chant so if you don't want to go to her webpage just go the either the CDC or HHS websites, type in search Healthy People 2020 and follow the many link. Tenpenny's site just puts them all on one page for convenience but---whichever way you read this information ---it is vital.

Every outbreak of childhood illness in the last 5 years have occurred in highly vaccinated populations. The current mumps outbreak at a college campus-all vaccinated and the CDC is recommending a third does. What's not being reported is Merck is currently in court fighting a lawsuit by two of it's former researcher of the MMR who filed suit stating Merck faked the study results to maintain their profit margin because they are the only producers of the MMR:

Merck accused of stonewalling in mumps vaccine antitrust lawsuit: http://www.reuters.(dot)/article/2015/06/04/health-vaccine-idUSL1N0YQ0W820150604.

You can find more information on the lawsuit at the following links as well as the CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson's admission that the CDC manipulated the study data on the MMR connection to Autism.

-UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA United States of America ex rel., Stephen A Krahling and Joan A Wlochowski, AMENDED


ACT FILED Merck & . Defendant



Class Says Merck Lied About Mumps Vaccine By REUBEN KRAMER


-Memorandum issued by Judge explaining his ruling.


-Vaccine Whistleblowers File to Compel Merck to Respond to Federal Lawsuit: http://healthimpactnews(dot)com/2015/vaccine-whistleblowers-file-to-compel-merk-to-respond-to-federal-lawsuit/.

-My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998. I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data

were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.

Remainder of admission at: http://www.morganverkamp(dot)com/august-27-2014-press-release-statement-of-william-w-thompson-ph-d-regarding-the-2004-article-examining-the-possibility-of-a-relationship-between-mmr-vaccine-and-autism/.

-CDC Whistleblower Revealed:

-CDC Whistleblower Dr. Thompson on Thimerosal and Pregnant Women:

-Whistleblower Thompson's Call to Congress:

-October 18, 2002 letter to Melinda Wharton, Coleen Boyle and others, where William Thompson announces he is hiring his own lawyer and implies CDC cover-up of a D.O.J. investigation:


Dear Melinda, I am writing once more regarding the recent Department of Justice (DOJ) request for a broad range of documents associated with MMR, thinners, and Autism. I first spoke with you on September 3rd of 2002 regarding the sensitive results we have been struggling within in the MADDSP MMR/Autism Study. I have also tried to bring your attention to some potentially sensitive legal issues surrounding what documents we should provide for his study. We have subsequently been told by both Beverly Dozier and Kevin Malone that we should apply na very broad definition to the documents that we provide to the DOJ.

-February 2nd, 2004 letter to Dr. Julie Gerberding:


(Gerberding's solution to the Thompson problem, remove his presentation from the agenda, essentially silencing him)

article here