- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search



Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

Bundys, Rod Class, and Michigan General Jural Assembly News


By Anna Von Reitz

February 22nd 2018


1. Regarding the Bundys calling for an American Common Law Court to try their case:


Everyone who has had a Birth Certificate issued in their NAME has to take action to correct the false legal presumptions that that creates. 


As things stand, the Bundys and the others have never corrected their status and so still stand subject to federal courts. That doesn't mean they can't bring their case to American Common Law Courts, too--- but it doesn't solve the problem, which is federal over-reach and false presumption and racketeering based on falsified public records kept on each one of us. 


Worse, there probably aren't enough people in that county who have corrected their status to form a jury pool of their "peers"---yet.   


There has to be an entire education and organization process to even form the court necessary--- to elect the justices of the peace, to elect a clerk, a bailiff, a bondsmen, a coroner, and most importantly, a sheriff knowledgeable enough and willing to enforce the Public Law.  And Deputies acting in lawful capacity to support him.


I am not saying that all this shouldn't be done or couldn't be done--- it must be done, and the sooner the better all over this country,  but Trump's Administration also has to co-operate and recognize the proper jurisdiction of the people and the court, which is just as big a problem and educational effort. Yes, most Federales are just as dumb or dumber about all this stuff as we have been.


Take a deep breath and plod forward---- learning and teaching as you go.  Which reminds me-- this is Thursday.  That means that there is a national conference call sponsored by the Michigan General Jural Assembly tonight:


National Conference Call: 9 PM EST, call in number: 1-712-770-4160, access code 226823#.  Help to set up local county jural assemblies at their website:   and via their hotline from 2 to 7 PM EST, Monday through Thursday, at 1-989-450-5522.


2.  The Rod Class Supreme Court victory announced yesterday is important, but not yet getting to what I had hoped--- the constitutionality of the statute.  Instead, this is a preliminary challenge (I knew about it, but thought it had already been resolved) to clear the way to make the constitutional challenge.


Here is the actual meat of the SOTUS decision yesterday:


Held: A guilty plea, by itself, does not bar a federal criminal defendant from challenging the constitutionality of his statute of conviction on direct appeal.


So even if you plead guilty to the facts of a statutory charge, and even if you are a "federal citizen" you can still come back on appeal and challenge the constitutionality of the statute.  That's good to have established and many people who have been railroaded will be able to find their voice again because of it.


AbbyFebruary 22, 2018 at 9:27 PM

Concerning all this vast waking up that is anticipated, or that needs to be done - - along with the fact that Trust monies are being deliberately blocked which is needed to set up much of anything - -along with the fact that things take too long to finally see any green lights, There is another aspect; at the rate of progress, taking decades to move, there will be many many of those well informed folks who will die off. This tells me that it will be very hard to attain a majority of the population to join the Right Side. So with that in mind, and knowing now that we probably have at huge number of the younger generations who are anti-american/communist while true patriots die off, where does this baby ever get off the ground and actually fly.




common lawFebruary 22, 2018 at 10:25 PM

Necessity of self-preservation is what will give this wings;


Maxim - Necessity gives a privilege with reference to private rights. The necessity involved in this maxim is of three kinds, viz.:

(1) Necessity of self-preservation;

(2) of obedience; and

(3) necessity resulting from the act of God, or of a stranger. Noy, Max. 32.


Necessity has no law. "Necessity shall be a good excuse in our law, and in every other law."



1FreeManFebruary 22, 2018 at 10:44 PM

Anna, there is a much easier way to settle court cases whether they be civil or criminal. Since the prosecutor, or plaintiff, is bringing in a bond in your name, they are using your equity and as such you have the right of subrogation. In court just say to the judge, Are we on the record? Yes? OK, Well before we get started, I have a question. Will the prosecutor (or plaintiff) certify my right of subrogation? And could I have that in writing please?


That's it. Now of course they will try to throw you off, get angry or ignore you, but if you keep coming back to your point and stay on it, "your honor we cannot proceed until the prosecutor (plaintiff) will certify my right of subrogation.", they have no choice and cannot refuse you your right of subrogation. If they accept, you say, well then I want the matter set off. Go ahead. You have my authority to take care of it. If for whatever reason they refuse to acknowledge your request, you say, I do not consent to these proceedings. Your offer is not accepted. I do not consent to being the surety for this case and these proceedings. I do believe I have a right of subrogation which is being denied. I demand the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged. If they still refuse, you say, now if we are not going to get this resolved today, then it is clear that I need a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because they don't have a claim. This is a very simple and straightforward solution to most court problems including foreclosure that just about anyone can use.